Hillary won in NH because she had Michael Whouley's great turnout operation that brought more working class single women to the polls than at any time in history. No poll picked up on those voters in likely voter screens. Interestingly, GOP likely voter screens missed the massive evangelical turnout for Huckabee in Iowa. And those single women voters were with Hillary from over a month ago – they didn't just turn to Hillary. Look at how well Hillary did in Manchester and Nashua – those are working class women. As for undecided voters that broke for Clinton, her debate performance did the trick.

I am an Obama supporter and I watched the debate and the coverage with my mother, who I've also convinced to support Obama. But watching with her showcased for me just how mysogynistic much of the media is – especially Chris Matthews. Mind you, none of that would make me support Hillary out of sympathy. But I could see why many women were angry.

But will that carry over to NV, SC and February 5? Not sure about that. I won't predict anything anymore, but I'm quite sure this race is far from over.

Now to be flip: why don't the Republicans just nominate Condi Rice? Skip right through all the primaries (the Republicans can use the money these days). Then maybe the Dems can nominate Oprah. Talk about experience v. inspiration….

In 2000 The Vice Presidential Candidate for the Democrats was Lieberman. Today he is an independent siding with Republicans. Stabbed in the back by his own party and the progressives who are vehemently antiwar.

In 2004 the Vice Presidential candidate was John Edwards. Today the man who asked him to help him govern America endorsed his rival and left him standing in the cold.

From 1992 until 2006 Bill and Hillary Clinton were considered the champions of Civil rights in this country. Today they are being accused of being racist because they are campaigning against a black man.

Politics of course is a brutal business but no where more so then in the Democratic party where “I've got you back” means here comes the dagger.

This was not because she was a woman, but because, regardless of sex, she is seen as cold and unemotional, a conniver, and luster for power.

Were their some comments by troglodytes re: sexist tinged? Sure. But they were no Obama backers.

As Joe documents, the same cannot be said of Clintonistas' race tinged remarks: http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blo…

Supporting an opponent of Clinton in the primary, I have precisely zero vested interest in seeing sexism where it isn't there. The ridiculous coverage of Clinton's tears as a avenue for “discussing” whether her “emotions would get the best of her” was sexist, plain and simple. I mean, John Boehner seems to break down sobbing every 30 minutes on Iraq, but nobody starts questioning whether he's really just a sniveling wimp without control of his emotions.