An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Iraq: ‘Shock & Awe’ Continues Even After Five Years…

shock and awe

After shamelessly proclaiming from rooftops that situation is normalising in Iraq, the US administration would find it difficult to explain why it has to resort to “shock and awe” strategy even after five years of occupation of that country. As Firedoglake puts it succinctly, “That the insurgency — five years after ‘Mission Accomplished’ — is still powerful and entrenched enough to draw airstrikes of that size, that close to Baghdad, should tell Americans everything they need to know about how completely futile this war is.”

The Associated Press news story: “U.S. warplanes unleashed one of the most intense airstrikes of the Iraq war Thursday, dropping 40,000 pounds of explosives in a thunderous 10-minute onslaught on suspected al-Qaida in Iraq safe havens in Sunni farmlands south of Baghdad.

“The mighty barrage — recalling the Pentagon’s ’shock and awe’ raids during the 2003 invasion — appeared to mark a significant escalation in a countrywide offensive launched this week to try to cripple remaining insurgent strongholds.”

No one is bothered, and anxious to ask, that in such “shock and awe” brutal assaults how many innocent men, women and children are slaughtered. There are still dimwits who believe that such strategy can continue for another century!!! This reminds one of the old adage that aptly describes the dimwits…those who bring down the entire house to kill a mouse!!!

  • SteveK
    It's criminal and it's insane... Maybe they're doing it like this so they can plea of "criminal insanity".

    Meanwhile - The major 'News Stories' out of Iraq today are about Anbar [sp] Provence being returned to Iraqi rule... sometime, somehow, someday.

    What an obscene atrocity!
  • DLS
    It's not "shock and awe" and shouldn't be described that way.

    As far as air strikes are concerned, they're no substitute for controlling things on the ground by ground forces, but are justified where there is a threat. And if you recall what happened to Americans in Fallujah years ago, the obvious thing to have been done at that time was to remove all other Americans and completely destroy that city as a warning to others.
  • elrod
    Destroy that city as a warning to others? That worked wonders for building hearts and minds, huh? Air power is devastatingly idiotic tool in counterinsurgency. I'm shocked that General Petraeus would elect to use it, knowing that it would make his "turn them to our side" strategy impossible. Overbearing force is precisely would extended the life of the insurgency. The smartest thing Petraeus did was send soldiers into villages and convince the people that were their friends. It generated enough trust to support the anti-AQI Awakening Councils. The Diyala strategy seems designed to prevent the creation of Awakening Councils. And I'm sure AQI is laughing away up in Mosul.
  • StockBoySF
    Why don't we just carpet bomb Iraq in one fell swoop, rather than piecemeal? Once we do that we can go in, take the oil and do whatever else it is that Bush wants. Oh, yeah. Install military bases along the Iraqi-Iranian border and put some minuteman silos there.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC