<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guest Voice: Dr. Paul’s Glorious Drive For Freedom (UPDATED)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:11:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: find baby furniture cribs here</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/comment-page-1/#comment-181194</link>
		<dc:creator>find baby furniture cribs here</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/ron-paul/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/#comment-181194</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;find baby furniture cribs here...&lt;/strong&gt;

My son is in fifth grade and is spending a great deal of time after school doing homework. I love to sit with him as he plows his way through history, English, math, science, Spanish and more. I have to admit that I am learning so much......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>find baby furniture cribs here&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>My son is in fifth grade and is spending a great deal of time after school doing homework. I love to sit with him as he plows his way through history, English, math, science, Spanish and more. I have to admit that I am learning so much&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: find baby nursery bedding here</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/comment-page-1/#comment-181176</link>
		<dc:creator>find baby nursery bedding here</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/ron-paul/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/#comment-181176</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;find baby nursery bedding here...&lt;/strong&gt;

Colour is everything- lots of bright, fun colours should be used to make the place as lively as possible. Go over- the- top with your decoration too. If you think something is bordering on the garish with bright reds, yellows, greens and blues visible ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>find baby nursery bedding here&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Colour is everything- lots of bright, fun colours should be used to make the place as lively as possible. Go over- the- top with your decoration too. If you think something is bordering on the garish with bright reds, yellows, greens and blues visible &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: find nursery decoration here</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/comment-page-1/#comment-181165</link>
		<dc:creator>find nursery decoration here</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/ron-paul/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/#comment-181165</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;find nursery decoration here...&lt;/strong&gt;

I&#039;m looking foward to getting all the baby stuff together. My mom already bought us a carseat which is convertable and should last the kid as long as he needs a carseat. It does not have one of those parts that comes out so you can carry......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>find nursery decoration here&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking foward to getting all the baby stuff together. My mom already bought us a carseat which is convertable and should last the kid as long as he needs a carseat. It does not have one of those parts that comes out so you can carry&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Somebody</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/comment-page-1/#comment-109194</link>
		<dc:creator>Somebody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 04:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/ron-paul/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/#comment-109194</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;There is a huge difference between WW2 and today. In WW2 Congress declared war - they have not since. We are either not at war or a in an illegal war. So please explain how you think that the same rules should apply today?&lt;/em&gt;

This has been argued for 5 years.  Nothing has changed.  If GWB has violated the constitution then Impeach him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>There is a huge difference between WW2 and today. In WW2 Congress declared war &#8211; they have not since. We are either not at war or a in an illegal war. So please explain how you think that the same rules should apply today?</em></p>
<p>This has been argued for 5 years.  Nothing has changed.  If GWB has violated the constitution then Impeach him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Moderate Voice &#187; Domestic and international news analysis, irreverent comments, original reporting, and popular culture features from across the political spectrum.</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/comment-page-1/#comment-109171</link>
		<dc:creator>The Moderate Voice &#187; Domestic and international news analysis, irreverent comments, original reporting, and popular culture features from across the political spectrum.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/ron-paul/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/#comment-109171</guid>
		<description>[...] recently ran a post that simply did not mention Paul and got three insulting emails. Then TMV ran a column that praised him but said he didn&#8217;t have a chance of winning and got 10 personally insulting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently ran a post that simply did not mention Paul and got three insulting emails. Then TMV ran a column that praised him but said he didn&#8217;t have a chance of winning and got 10 personally insulting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/comment-page-1/#comment-109166</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/ron-paul/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/#comment-109166</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I understand where libertarians come from. They are anarchists.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not all, just the ignorant and (worse) the childish who ironically ape the radical left in demanding no limits, standards, or judgments of personal [mis]conduct.  They are the offensive ones to me, not the merely naive with total faith in what amounts in practice to an honor system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I understand where libertarians come from. They are anarchists.</p></blockquote>
<p>Not all, just the ignorant and (worse) the childish who ironically ape the radical left in demanding no limits, standards, or judgments of personal [mis]conduct.  They are the offensive ones to me, not the merely naive with total faith in what amounts in practice to an honor system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lnardozi</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/comment-page-1/#comment-109151</link>
		<dc:creator>lnardozi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/ron-paul/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/#comment-109151</guid>
		<description>The dollar slid across the board on Friday as data showing a 9 percent decline in sales of new U.S. homes last month heightened concern about the economy, putting the greenback on track for its worst week in more than a year.
The housing report, which was weaker than economists had expected, also bolstered the case for more Federal Reserve interest rate cuts in 2008. Earlier this week, the S&amp;P/Case-Shiller index showed a record decline in U.S. home prices in October.

This is what&#039;s happening to YOUR house. All the &#039;money&#039; and &#039;equity&#039; you though you had saved - eliminated! The equtiy through falling house prices - and the money because we are DEBASING OUR CURRENCY. That low fed rate you&#039;re reading about gets created by printing money  and lending it to people. With more money, the money YOU have is worth LESS. So your money is worth less and your property is worth less - where can you turn to keep ahead of inflation? I think  you BETTER turn to Dr. Paul. He&#039;s the ONLY one running that has a HOPE of being able to deal with this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dollar slid across the board on Friday as data showing a 9 percent decline in sales of new U.S. homes last month heightened concern about the economy, putting the greenback on track for its worst week in more than a year.<br />
The housing report, which was weaker than economists had expected, also bolstered the case for more Federal Reserve interest rate cuts in 2008. Earlier this week, the S&#038;P/Case-Shiller index showed a record decline in U.S. home prices in October.</p>
<p>This is what&#8217;s happening to YOUR house. All the &#8216;money&#8217; and &#8216;equity&#8217; you though you had saved &#8211; eliminated! The equtiy through falling house prices &#8211; and the money because we are DEBASING OUR CURRENCY. That low fed rate you&#8217;re reading about gets created by printing money  and lending it to people. With more money, the money YOU have is worth LESS. So your money is worth less and your property is worth less &#8211; where can you turn to keep ahead of inflation? I think  you BETTER turn to Dr. Paul. He&#8217;s the ONLY one running that has a HOPE of being able to deal with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJF</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/comment-page-1/#comment-109144</link>
		<dc:creator>TJF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/ron-paul/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/#comment-109144</guid>
		<description>Somebody said &quot;The problem is that they are aghast at a few War time incidents that all presidents have employed. Eavesdropping, internment. During WW2 the pows would have been held indefinitely until the war was concluded. This war still rages yet the Libertarians scream bloody murder that we are pissing on the constitution.&quot;

There is a huge difference between WW2 and today.  In WW2 Congress declared war - they have not since.  We are either not at war or a in an illegal war.  So please explain how you think that the same rules should apply today?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somebody said &#8220;The problem is that they are aghast at a few War time incidents that all presidents have employed. Eavesdropping, internment. During WW2 the pows would have been held indefinitely until the war was concluded. This war still rages yet the Libertarians scream bloody murder that we are pissing on the constitution.&#8221;</p>
<p>There is a huge difference between WW2 and today.  In WW2 Congress declared war &#8211; they have not since.  We are either not at war or a in an illegal war.  So please explain how you think that the same rules should apply today?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Somebody</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/comment-page-1/#comment-109082</link>
		<dc:creator>Somebody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 19:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/ron-paul/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/#comment-109082</guid>
		<description>DLS look at his record.  I do not advocate that Libertarians in general are as obsessive as is he.  Look at his record.

It speaks for its self.

I understand where libertarians come from.  They are anarchists.  Some more so then others.  The ones screaming the loudest are the ones who would revert this country to 1779 and the articles of confederation in which states were supreme.  This nation would be once again a conglomeration of states with a central government only responsible for defense.

A roll back is what they...all of them demand.  To when is what keeps them splintered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DLS look at his record.  I do not advocate that Libertarians in general are as obsessive as is he.  Look at his record.</p>
<p>It speaks for its self.</p>
<p>I understand where libertarians come from.  They are anarchists.  Some more so then others.  The ones screaming the loudest are the ones who would revert this country to 1779 and the articles of confederation in which states were supreme.  This nation would be once again a conglomeration of states with a central government only responsible for defense.</p>
<p>A roll back is what they&#8230;all of them demand.  To when is what keeps them splintered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/comment-page-1/#comment-109063</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/ron-paul/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/#comment-109063</guid>
		<description>Ron Paul for president means dismantling 225 years of work because Ron Paul says so.

Not true, Somebody.  That&#039;s also not true for the big-L Libertarians and those of us who are mainstream little-l libertarian (except where being an ideological purist is inferior to something else), who are among the many who know better about Big Government and reject lock-step approval of it nowdays.

The common starting points for &quot;undoing&quot; things are 1932 (as we&#039;re almost at 2008, that&#039;s 76 years) or 1913 (95 years) depending on the desired goals.

We know mistakes were made and hopefully these should be corrected.  Given the numbers of those in favor of the New Deal and Great Society, in particular, it&#039;s not going to happen any time soon.

Instead we settle for improved rationality (questioning the failed Gospel of Government, which only people who are stuck at the year 1972 or decades earlier still adhere to religiously) and, of course, damage control.

That&#039;s why often the Republicans are the lesser evil, boring or unattractive or non-positive (as well as often unappealing) as they often are.  Grown-ups aren&#039;t beholden to the Democrats but at least look at the GOP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Paul for president means dismantling 225 years of work because Ron Paul says so.</p>
<p>Not true, Somebody.  That&#8217;s also not true for the big-L Libertarians and those of us who are mainstream little-l libertarian (except where being an ideological purist is inferior to something else), who are among the many who know better about Big Government and reject lock-step approval of it nowdays.</p>
<p>The common starting points for &#8220;undoing&#8221; things are 1932 (as we&#8217;re almost at 2008, that&#8217;s 76 years) or 1913 (95 years) depending on the desired goals.</p>
<p>We know mistakes were made and hopefully these should be corrected.  Given the numbers of those in favor of the New Deal and Great Society, in particular, it&#8217;s not going to happen any time soon.</p>
<p>Instead we settle for improved rationality (questioning the failed Gospel of Government, which only people who are stuck at the year 1972 or decades earlier still adhere to religiously) and, of course, damage control.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why often the Republicans are the lesser evil, boring or unattractive or non-positive (as well as often unappealing) as they often are.  Grown-ups aren&#8217;t beholden to the Democrats but at least look at the GOP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Somebody</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/comment-page-1/#comment-109060</link>
		<dc:creator>Somebody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 17:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/ron-paul/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/#comment-109060</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Joe.  He will not win. 

The proponents of the Libertarian and alternative to the big two just SO much want something different that they get very animated and vocal in opposition to anyone who might throw water on their campfire.

I sympathize with them but if you look at Mr. Pauls record in congress it is the epitome of Nothingness.  He opposes nearly every thing because it does not coincide with his version of what the constitution means.

Ron Paul for president means dismantling 225 years of work because Ron Paul says so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Joe.  He will not win. </p>
<p>The proponents of the Libertarian and alternative to the big two just SO much want something different that they get very animated and vocal in opposition to anyone who might throw water on their campfire.</p>
<p>I sympathize with them but if you look at Mr. Pauls record in congress it is the epitome of Nothingness.  He opposes nearly every thing because it does not coincide with his version of what the constitution means.</p>
<p>Ron Paul for president means dismantling 225 years of work because Ron Paul says so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: intuitivelyinspired</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/comment-page-1/#comment-109059</link>
		<dc:creator>intuitivelyinspired</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 17:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/ron-paul/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/#comment-109059</guid>
		<description>Yes, you have missed at least one. With all respect I consider this AOL (isn&#039;t that Time-Warner nowadays too?) Poll to be a &quot;Major&quot; Poll, especially with the very large sampling and &quot;one ISP on Vote&quot; set up. &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.aol.com/political-machine/straw-poll&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;See it [and vote] for yourself&lt;/a&gt;. I hope you&#039;ll make good on your post and &quot;run&quot; it.
I myself was awestruck at the thousands of self described RP supporter&#039;s well written words on NPRs &quot;Bryant Park Project&quot;&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/blogs/bryantpark/2007/12/who_are_ron_pauls_supporters.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;weblog page&lt;/a&gt; as it grew the other week; seems this sort of thing is the real story, can you recommend a real news outfit where I can really read about it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you have missed at least one. With all respect I consider this AOL (isn&#8217;t that Time-Warner nowadays too?) Poll to be a &#8220;Major&#8221; Poll, especially with the very large sampling and &#8220;one ISP on Vote&#8221; set up. <a href="http://news.aol.com/political-machine/straw-poll" rel="nofollow">See it [and vote] for yourself</a>. I hope you&#8217;ll make good on your post and &#8220;run&#8221; it.<br />
I myself was awestruck at the thousands of self described RP supporter&#8217;s well written words on NPRs &#8220;Bryant Park Project&#8221;&#8216;s <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/bryantpark/2007/12/who_are_ron_pauls_supporters.html" rel="nofollow">weblog page</a> as it grew the other week; seems this sort of thing is the real story, can you recommend a real news outfit where I can really read about it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jilly Dybka</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/comment-page-1/#comment-109057</link>
		<dc:creator>Jilly Dybka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 17:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/ron-paul/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/#comment-109057</guid>
		<description>Here in Tennessee, Dr. Paul has had &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesfreepress.com/absolutenm/templates/local.aspx?articleid=27437&amp;zoneid=77&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;more folks apply to be a delegate&lt;/a&gt; than any other Republican candidate. Over 100. Fred Thompson is 2nd with 70-something. That is what counts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here in Tennessee, Dr. Paul has had <a href="http://www.timesfreepress.com/absolutenm/templates/local.aspx?articleid=27437&#038;zoneid=77" rel="nofollow">more folks apply to be a delegate</a> than any other Republican candidate. Over 100. Fred Thompson is 2nd with 70-something. That is what counts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/comment-page-1/#comment-109038</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/ron-paul/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/#comment-109038</guid>
		<description>Paul won&#039;t get the nomination.  Nor will Huckabee.  He might be offered the VP slot eventually, but the big-money crowd (I hope they don&#039;t push Bloomberg, a big DQ, next year) and the big-government GOP crowd will not want Huckabee as President.  The nomination will just be sought in a way that hopefully will encourage rather than discourage the Religious Right to turn out and vote.  I suspect that even with a large R.R. turnout, a Democrat is going to win next year, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul won&#8217;t get the nomination.  Nor will Huckabee.  He might be offered the VP slot eventually, but the big-money crowd (I hope they don&#8217;t push Bloomberg, a big DQ, next year) and the big-government GOP crowd will not want Huckabee as President.  The nomination will just be sought in a way that hopefully will encourage rather than discourage the Religious Right to turn out and vote.  I suspect that even with a large R.R. turnout, a Democrat is going to win next year, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Gandelman</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/comment-page-1/#comment-109035</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Gandelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/ron-paul/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/#comment-109035</guid>
		<description>I have to add this. Just because experts and polls say that as of a given moment someone can&#039;t win doesn&#039;t means people should give up the good fight for their candidates. For one thing, political shocks do occur but usually the polls are NOT off by that much. Secondly, if the ideas of a candidate and the content of his/her candidacy matter then that must be continually pressed because it could be that in X election the candidate doesn&#039;t triumph, but picks up enough support so that (a) the ideas triumph via a candidate with identical ones in a future election OR (b) one or more of the political parties &quot;steals the thunder&quot; of the candidate and incorporates their ideas so they become the conventional wisdom in the future. If candidates and their supporters were supposed to give up hope and campaigning, then why bother with costly elections? Why not just do a national poll on election day and let that decide the winner?

But that said, there is a reality in poll numbers. There is a margin of error. And that means that in terms of political science reality it is indeed highly unlikely right now that Ron Paul with the polling numbers he has is going to win the Republican nomination.

Could it happen? There are various reports that indicate if New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg decides to run he&#039;ll use a chunk of his own big bucks to do so since money DOES count. And Paul has the money for advertising.

Still, it is hard to see an instance in political history where a candidate with such low polling numbers went on to get their party&#039;s nomination. FACT. Not OPINION.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to add this. Just because experts and polls say that as of a given moment someone can&#8217;t win doesn&#8217;t means people should give up the good fight for their candidates. For one thing, political shocks do occur but usually the polls are NOT off by that much. Secondly, if the ideas of a candidate and the content of his/her candidacy matter then that must be continually pressed because it could be that in X election the candidate doesn&#8217;t triumph, but picks up enough support so that (a) the ideas triumph via a candidate with identical ones in a future election OR (b) one or more of the political parties &#8220;steals the thunder&#8221; of the candidate and incorporates their ideas so they become the conventional wisdom in the future. If candidates and their supporters were supposed to give up hope and campaigning, then why bother with costly elections? Why not just do a national poll on election day and let that decide the winner?</p>
<p>But that said, there is a reality in poll numbers. There is a margin of error. And that means that in terms of political science reality it is indeed highly unlikely right now that Ron Paul with the polling numbers he has is going to win the Republican nomination.</p>
<p>Could it happen? There are various reports that indicate if New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg decides to run he&#8217;ll use a chunk of his own big bucks to do so since money DOES count. And Paul has the money for advertising.</p>
<p>Still, it is hard to see an instance in political history where a candidate with such low polling numbers went on to get their party&#8217;s nomination. FACT. Not OPINION.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Gandelman</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/comment-page-1/#comment-109032</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Gandelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/ron-paul/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/#comment-109032</guid>
		<description>One thing. This is a Guest Voice column. I&#039;ve already gotten two very insulting emails on this from Ron Paul supporters. OR they are people Ron Paul OPPONENTS must have emailing people because they&#039;re really insulting emails that go after me and this site. If people see their eye doctors they will be able to note from this post that it is a GUEST VOICE post which means it is written by someone else and his byline is there. 

Secondly, the writer of this piece is saying that given what every single major poll has shown: Ron Paul isn&#039;t going to win the Presidency, at least if he intends to do it through the Republican party. That is not an unusually harsh statement to make, given the polling numbers and it does not show that he is biased against Ron Paul. Unless I missed it, there is not  one single poll that shows Paul in even the top four. This is not BIAS saying that. It&#039;s stating a fact (if we missed a major poll that shows Paul in the top four, then please put the link in comments and we&#039;ll run it).

Those who wish to email THE AUTHOR of this column (I&#039;m changing the byline on this to Cagle Cartoons which it should have been anyway) can do so at the email below.

One bit of advice: sending name-calling emails to bloggers, reporters, blogs and mainstream publications doesn&#039;t help your candidate. I got a lot of emails from people who like Ron Paul thanking TMV for running this so to be accurate the emails I got were not indicative of all Ron Paul supporters. I will delete any further emails from those people who emailed me earlier. No time and &lt;em&gt;not worth the time.&lt;/em&gt;

Here is the email address to contact THE WRITER of the piece above if you want to convince him that Ron Paul is a shoo-in to win the Republican nomination:
&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:steigerwald@caglecartoons.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;steigerwald@caglecartoons.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing. This is a Guest Voice column. I&#8217;ve already gotten two very insulting emails on this from Ron Paul supporters. OR they are people Ron Paul OPPONENTS must have emailing people because they&#8217;re really insulting emails that go after me and this site. If people see their eye doctors they will be able to note from this post that it is a GUEST VOICE post which means it is written by someone else and his byline is there. </p>
<p>Secondly, the writer of this piece is saying that given what every single major poll has shown: Ron Paul isn&#8217;t going to win the Presidency, at least if he intends to do it through the Republican party. That is not an unusually harsh statement to make, given the polling numbers and it does not show that he is biased against Ron Paul. Unless I missed it, there is not  one single poll that shows Paul in even the top four. This is not BIAS saying that. It&#8217;s stating a fact (if we missed a major poll that shows Paul in the top four, then please put the link in comments and we&#8217;ll run it).</p>
<p>Those who wish to email THE AUTHOR of this column (I&#8217;m changing the byline on this to Cagle Cartoons which it should have been anyway) can do so at the email below.</p>
<p>One bit of advice: sending name-calling emails to bloggers, reporters, blogs and mainstream publications doesn&#8217;t help your candidate. I got a lot of emails from people who like Ron Paul thanking TMV for running this so to be accurate the emails I got were not indicative of all Ron Paul supporters. I will delete any further emails from those people who emailed me earlier. No time and <em>not worth the time.</em></p>
<p>Here is the email address to contact THE WRITER of the piece above if you want to convince him that Ron Paul is a shoo-in to win the Republican nomination:<br />
<a href="mailto:steigerwald@caglecartoons.com" rel="nofollow">steigerwald@caglecartoons.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/comment-page-1/#comment-109030</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/ron-paul/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/#comment-109030</guid>
		<description>The anti-war cause only makes some Paul fans look as silly as the radical left.  Are Sean Penn and &quot;Baghad&quot; McDermott going to vote for Paul?

Meanwhile, the real issue is here at home -- when you rob from several Peters to pay several more Pauls (pun not intended), you have the vast support of the several more Pauls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The anti-war cause only makes some Paul fans look as silly as the radical left.  Are Sean Penn and &#8220;Baghad&#8221; McDermott going to vote for Paul?</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the real issue is here at home &#8212; when you rob from several Peters to pay several more Pauls (pun not intended), you have the vast support of the several more Pauls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/comment-page-1/#comment-109029</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/ron-paul/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/#comment-109029</guid>
		<description>The real problem isn&#039;t that some calling themselves libertarians are joining the radical left lunatic fringe.  (I&#039;ve seen similar nonsense by the same people in the past, such as denying that China is an adversary or a threat to any other nation in the world.)

The real problem is that the vast middle class, not merely the poor, are hooked on entitlements and they welcome an overgrown, over-interventionist federal government.

While reality has forced smarter Americans to reconsider this position, Goldwater would still face scummy treatment and an astounding defeat today; too many continue to find what Paul as well as those of us who are more reasoned want done in general to this nation quaint at best and obviously unacceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real problem isn&#8217;t that some calling themselves libertarians are joining the radical left lunatic fringe.  (I&#8217;ve seen similar nonsense by the same people in the past, such as denying that China is an adversary or a threat to any other nation in the world.)</p>
<p>The real problem is that the vast middle class, not merely the poor, are hooked on entitlements and they welcome an overgrown, over-interventionist federal government.</p>
<p>While reality has forced smarter Americans to reconsider this position, Goldwater would still face scummy treatment and an astounding defeat today; too many continue to find what Paul as well as those of us who are more reasoned want done in general to this nation quaint at best and obviously unacceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foobar</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/comment-page-1/#comment-109024</link>
		<dc:creator>foobar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/ron-paul/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/#comment-109024</guid>
		<description>&quot;the Pittsburgh-raised libertarian doctor and 10-term Texas congressman isn’t going to become the Republican presidential nominee.&quot;

can i use your crystal ball when your done with it?

&quot;But he and everyone else who hasn’t lost his grip on political reality has always known that America’s future doesn’t include a President Ron Paul.&quot;

insulting.



I&#039;m sorry I wasted 5 minutes on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the Pittsburgh-raised libertarian doctor and 10-term Texas congressman isn’t going to become the Republican presidential nominee.&#8221;</p>
<p>can i use your crystal ball when your done with it?</p>
<p>&#8220;But he and everyone else who hasn’t lost his grip on political reality has always known that America’s future doesn’t include a President Ron Paul.&#8221;</p>
<p>insulting.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry I wasted 5 minutes on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Somebody</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/comment-page-1/#comment-109017</link>
		<dc:creator>Somebody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 14:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/ron-paul/16737/guest-voice-dr-paul%e2%80%99s-glorious-drive-for-freedom/#comment-109017</guid>
		<description>Mr. Paul represents the Libertarian protest vote.  Most of us understand that the libertarians joined with the Republican party as the lessor of two evils.

The problem is that they are aghast at a few War time incidents that all presidents have employed. Eavesdropping, internment.  During WW2 the pows would have been held indefinitely until the war was concluded.  This war still rages yet the Libertarians scream bloody murder that we are pissing on the constitution.

We are not.  It is just that the Libertarians and the Anti/war have joined forces, held hands and now the 10 percent he is polling is the protest vote within the GOP over perceived injustices.

Had Bush really violated the constitution even the GOP would have hung him.  It is just this fringe......loon.....Constitution thumping Evangelists of the libertarian vein that preach to us over and over the evils of BDS until finally a nation became brainwashed by its message.

Hallelujah brother.  Shout it loud.  Shout it long.  Preach to the masses brother.  

But in the end look at what the man has done in congress and what he stands for.

That can be summed up in one word.

&lt;strong&gt;NOTHING&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Paul represents the Libertarian protest vote.  Most of us understand that the libertarians joined with the Republican party as the lessor of two evils.</p>
<p>The problem is that they are aghast at a few War time incidents that all presidents have employed. Eavesdropping, internment.  During WW2 the pows would have been held indefinitely until the war was concluded.  This war still rages yet the Libertarians scream bloody murder that we are pissing on the constitution.</p>
<p>We are not.  It is just that the Libertarians and the Anti/war have joined forces, held hands and now the 10 percent he is polling is the protest vote within the GOP over perceived injustices.</p>
<p>Had Bush really violated the constitution even the GOP would have hung him.  It is just this fringe&#8230;&#8230;loon&#8230;..Constitution thumping Evangelists of the libertarian vein that preach to us over and over the evils of BDS until finally a nation became brainwashed by its message.</p>
<p>Hallelujah brother.  Shout it loud.  Shout it long.  Preach to the masses brother.  </p>
<p>But in the end look at what the man has done in congress and what he stands for.</p>
<p>That can be summed up in one word.</p>
<p><strong>NOTHING</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

