<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poll Says Clinton Suddenly Regains Big Lead In New Hampshire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/16595/poll-says-clinton-suddenly-regains-big-lead-in-new-hampshire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16595/poll-says-clinton-suddenly-regains-big-lead-in-new-hampshire/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:28:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Did Slick Wifey Manufacture Williesque Scandal? &#171; CAN YOU SPEAK THIS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16595/poll-says-clinton-suddenly-regains-big-lead-in-new-hampshire/comment-page-1/#comment-108446</link>
		<dc:creator>Did Slick Wifey Manufacture Williesque Scandal? &#171; CAN YOU SPEAK THIS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 06:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/barack-obama/16595/poll-says-clinton-suddenly-regains-big-lead-in-new-hampshire/#comment-108446</guid>
		<description>[...] it can’t afford to come in third. Hillary has just regained a significant lead in New Hampshire (The Moderate Voice), and if Clinton placed third in Iowa that lead would likely evaporate as New Hampshire voters [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it can’t afford to come in third. Hillary has just regained a significant lead in New Hampshire (The Moderate Voice), and if Clinton placed third in Iowa that lead would likely evaporate as New Hampshire voters [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16595/poll-says-clinton-suddenly-regains-big-lead-in-new-hampshire/comment-page-1/#comment-108426</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/barack-obama/16595/poll-says-clinton-suddenly-regains-big-lead-in-new-hampshire/#comment-108426</guid>
		<description>The one good piece of news that is substantial at this time is the fall of Giuliani (which many of us don&#039;t regret).  He isn&#039;t even bothering to spend a respectable amount of time here in Iowa, but is sitting down in Florida -- and Huckabee is doing well against him there, too!  Giuliani&#039;s fall has to be good news for the Democratic candidates and to Democratic voters.  Note also Huckabee&#039;s rise nationally, not only in Iowa.

I&#039;m surprised all the liberals here on this &quot;moderate&quot; [sic] site haven&#039;t taken time out from their hyper-analysis of the hourly state of Democratic candidates to view their opposition.  (Tunnel vision...)  There&#039;s information on the Dems in this report, too.

From the latest poll showing a &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119810092342540425.html?mod=googlenews_wsj&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wide-open GOP field and Giuliani no longer a strong leader&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll shows the former New York City mayor now tied nationally with former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney at 20% among Republicans nationally, just slightly ahead of former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee at 17% and Arizona Sen. John McCain at 14%. At a time when Mr. Romney has fallen behind Mr. Huckabee in the leadoff state of Iowa, the result signals a dramatic shift in the nature of the Republican contest: In a party with a history of rewarding established front-runners, there&#039;s no longer a front-runner of any kind.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;The Democratic race has remained a more stable contest among the top contenders. Mrs. Clinton draws 45% of the national Democratic vote to 23% for Mr. Obama, both down slightly from November. Mr. Edwards has risen slightly to 13% from 11%, with the remaining Democratic contenders drawing 4% of the vote or less.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;...[T]he survey shows Mr. Obama leading Mr. Giuliani by 49%-40% in a hypothetical match up, a margin exceeding Mrs. Clinton&#039;s 46%-43% edge over the ex-mayor. Mr. Obama leads Mr. Huckabee, the hottest Republican candidate currently, by 48%-36%. Mrs. Clinton leads Mr. Huckabee by a narrow 46%-44% margin.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one good piece of news that is substantial at this time is the fall of Giuliani (which many of us don&#8217;t regret).  He isn&#8217;t even bothering to spend a respectable amount of time here in Iowa, but is sitting down in Florida &#8212; and Huckabee is doing well against him there, too!  Giuliani&#8217;s fall has to be good news for the Democratic candidates and to Democratic voters.  Note also Huckabee&#8217;s rise nationally, not only in Iowa.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m surprised all the liberals here on this &#8220;moderate&#8221; [sic] site haven&#8217;t taken time out from their hyper-analysis of the hourly state of Democratic candidates to view their opposition.  (Tunnel vision&#8230;)  There&#8217;s information on the Dems in this report, too.</p>
<p>From the latest poll showing a <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119810092342540425.html?mod=googlenews_wsj" rel="nofollow">wide-open GOP field and Giuliani no longer a strong leader</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll shows the former New York City mayor now tied nationally with former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney at 20% among Republicans nationally, just slightly ahead of former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee at 17% and Arizona Sen. John McCain at 14%. At a time when Mr. Romney has fallen behind Mr. Huckabee in the leadoff state of Iowa, the result signals a dramatic shift in the nature of the Republican contest: In a party with a history of rewarding established front-runners, there&#8217;s no longer a front-runner of any kind.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>The Democratic race has remained a more stable contest among the top contenders. Mrs. Clinton draws 45% of the national Democratic vote to 23% for Mr. Obama, both down slightly from November. Mr. Edwards has risen slightly to 13% from 11%, with the remaining Democratic contenders drawing 4% of the vote or less.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;[T]he survey shows Mr. Obama leading Mr. Giuliani by 49%-40% in a hypothetical match up, a margin exceeding Mrs. Clinton&#8217;s 46%-43% edge over the ex-mayor. Mr. Obama leads Mr. Huckabee, the hottest Republican candidate currently, by 48%-36%. Mrs. Clinton leads Mr. Huckabee by a narrow 46%-44% margin.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Did Slick Wifey Manufacture Williesque Scandal? &#171; The Political Inquirer</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16595/poll-says-clinton-suddenly-regains-big-lead-in-new-hampshire/comment-page-1/#comment-108424</link>
		<dc:creator>Did Slick Wifey Manufacture Williesque Scandal? &#171; The Political Inquirer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/barack-obama/16595/poll-says-clinton-suddenly-regains-big-lead-in-new-hampshire/#comment-108424</guid>
		<description>[...] afford to come in third. Hillary has just regained a significant lead in New Hampshire (H/T: The Moderate Voice), and if Clinton placed third in Iowa that lead would likely evaporate as New Hampshire voters [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] afford to come in third. Hillary has just regained a significant lead in New Hampshire (H/T: The Moderate Voice), and if Clinton placed third in Iowa that lead would likely evaporate as New Hampshire voters [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16595/poll-says-clinton-suddenly-regains-big-lead-in-new-hampshire/comment-page-1/#comment-108412</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/barack-obama/16595/poll-says-clinton-suddenly-regains-big-lead-in-new-hampshire/#comment-108412</guid>
		<description>CNN = Clinton News Network, Clearly Not Neutral

There&#039;s no need for hyperventilating and micro-analyzing every hour of the (Democratic) campaigns; just wait until after elections actually begin, and particularly until after February 5th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN = Clinton News Network, Clearly Not Neutral</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no need for hyperventilating and micro-analyzing every hour of the (Democratic) campaigns; just wait until after elections actually begin, and particularly until after February 5th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16595/poll-says-clinton-suddenly-regains-big-lead-in-new-hampshire/comment-page-1/#comment-108398</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/barack-obama/16595/poll-says-clinton-suddenly-regains-big-lead-in-new-hampshire/#comment-108398</guid>
		<description>Wow.  I&#039;m shocked, shocked I tell you, that Senator Clinton is ahead in a CNN poll.

You&#039;ll have to forgive my skepticism here, but when half a dozen polls tell you half a dozen different things about who&#039;s in first, it&#039;s tough to take any of them seriously.  Least of all a poll taken by a &quot;news&quot; company that shows as much favoritism for Clinton as Fox does for GWB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  I&#8217;m shocked, shocked I tell you, that Senator Clinton is ahead in a CNN poll.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll have to forgive my skepticism here, but when half a dozen polls tell you half a dozen different things about who&#8217;s in first, it&#8217;s tough to take any of them seriously.  Least of all a poll taken by a &#8220;news&#8221; company that shows as much favoritism for Clinton as Fox does for GWB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

