I asked a question on another post…why they are so afraid of the Republicans pandering to the Religious base and they offered a few lame excuses but If the GOP throws out Rudi against Hillary you now have a RINO liberal vs a moderate Liberal and this could well spell another 4 years of GOP rule.

Rudi could very well pull a lot of traditional democratic voters along with the right who hold their noses and pull the lever. Rudi is the only man in the race that can beat Hillary. It is why the far left loons are screaming so loudly.

In truth they are not afraid of Christians. Those screaming the loudest are those afraid of 4 more years of ANY GOP rule. Any at all. Even by a RINO Liberal.

Anything to bash someone who puts up a fake “centrist-moderate” mask rather than demand we get our troups of Iraq now! and denying there is any malevolence or misconduct by the poor, sweet, innocent, misunderstood, US-abused little Iranian National Guard. (What’s next, demanding she cheer the destruction of McDonald’s and Starbucks stores during the next anti-globalization “demonstration” and associated opportunistic violence?)

The Pew reports on Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina also include nationwide figures.

Be aware that while Democrats favor concentration on issues rather than electability as the primary strategy for judging candidates (71% to 24%), at election time all it’s going to take for many to change their strategic priorities is to remember the last act or statement by Bush. “First, remove the GOP!”

Likely Democratic voters in the entire USA favor Hillary Clinton at 48% of the total. (Let’s not see a full-screen elation at her not getting fifty per cent.) Obama comes in second at 22%.

Clinton is absolutely disfavored by only 9% of the likely Dem US electorate. Obama is right behind her at 8%.

Most-electable percentages in the USA are 62% for Clinton, 12% for Obama, and 11% for Edwards.
(Most-electable percentages in Iowa are 48% for Clinton, 18% for Obama, and 15% for Edwards. Again, let’s not see another full-screen elation to start a new discussion because she’s below 50%.)

We know the negatives about her already. She has radical-left roots to her; she is more vicious and destructive than Nixon, and is more obscessed with secrecy as well as power than Cheney. But she’s the likely nominee as well as likely next President. Is the bashing we see simply a case of the farther-left cyber-space blogger-blather equivalent of the very frustrated, angry, and childish Democratic left wing that demands more “spine” (in fact, troublemaking, obstructionism, and repellent goals and actions as far as the rest of America is concerned) in Congress?

Temper, temper, people.