Debate Attack Obama Should Make But Won’t
The President is poor-mouthing his prospects in tomorrow night’s debate.
“Governor Romney is a good debater,” he tells a Las Vegas crowd. “I’m just okay.”
Sadly, behind the fake modesty is an unexpressed truth: Barack Obama, with characteristic caution, will almost certainly skirt the heart of darkness underlying this election.
Let me do it for him. Either before the debate or early in it, this should be said:
“The choice is ostensibly whether Governor Romney or I lead the lead the nation for the next four years, but voters must see that decision in the light of what has happened to America in the past four years.
“The Republican party, or the aberration it now is, has devoted four years, as its Senate leader predicted, to making me a one-term president with a Congressional cohort voting as a bloc against every attempt to help the nation overcome economic adversity and, in the process, creating its own disasters, such as needlessly lowering America’s credit rating.
“Despite that, we have saved Detroit, created new jobs and put America on the road to economic recovery. What more might we have done without mindless opposition?
“Great men, the conventional wisdom holds, stand on the shoulders of those who came before them. On whose shoulders does Governor Romney stand?
“Those of Mitch McConnell and John Boehner and the Tea Party newcomers who have tied government’s hands into making legislative obstruction the hallmark of their tenure?
“Based on the debates that brought him the nomination, are they those of Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum, Michele Bachmann, Rick Perry and Herman Cain whom he had to outdo in demagoguery and irrationality to get here?
“As we debate details of issues and press Governor Romney for precisely what he proposes to do with the ‘Trust me’ blank check he is asking voters to give him, who will be the cosigners if he were to became President?”
MORE.
Share This
You are right on the money, Mr. Stein! Thank you. Somebody should raise ALL these points, and on national TV too. I’ve always believed Americans were fans of fair play. But the way Obama’s been treated by Republicans (plus over half the country’s population) these past 3.8 or so years, it makes me wonder if fair play even exists.
How can so many people complain about what Obama HASN’T done when he’s been blocked at every turn by Boehner and his gang? How can people complain about so few jobs being created when the jobs bill is still sitting there and Boehner refuses to allow it to come up for discussion? I mean, holy crap, when you challenge somebody to a fight, then tie his arms behind his back, how can you honestly complain that the guy is a lousy fighter who can’t land a punch or get anything done? And why do so many people consistently diminish the positive things he HAS done? Saving the car industry, passing health care, getting bin Laden. I swear, if an incumbent Repblican had done the first and last of these three items, he’d be getting 99% of the vote.
Now today I read that George Will over at the Washington Post believes that Obama’s leading in the polls for one reason only — his COLOUR! Americans just “don’t want to give up on their first black president”, says Mr. Will. Good lord.
Will the racism, (which is what that is IMO), never stop?
Anyway, no one will raise the points Mr. Stein has written about above, I fear. It would take someone who believed in fair play to do it. And there aren’t that many folks around who do, anymore.
“whom he had to outdo in demagoguery and irrationality to get here?”
Lol, seriously.