
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush Reaffirms And Increases Verbal Support Of Pakistan&#8217;s Musharraf</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/16186/bush-reaffirms-and-increases-verbal-support-of-pakistans-musharraf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16186/bush-reaffirms-and-increases-verbal-support-of-pakistans-musharraf/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 05:56:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: domajot</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16186/bush-reaffirms-and-increases-verbal-support-of-pakistans-musharraf/comment-page-1/#comment-105611</link>
		<dc:creator>domajot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/bush-administration/16186/bush-reaffirms-and-increases-verbal-support-of-pakistans-musharraf/#comment-105611</guid>
		<description>I second Idosycratic&#039;s motion.

A littlle straight talk about Muchraff (and across athe toard, on all issues) is long overdue.  There are adults out there who can handle complex scenarios, it given half a chance.
Couching everything in loFty terminology (like democracy)  creates unwarranted expections.  Then, no matter what is done or not done looks like duplicity.  
A little straight talk, PLEASE
.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second Idosycratic&#8217;s motion.</p>
<p>A littlle straight talk about Muchraff (and across athe toard, on all issues) is long overdue.  There are adults out there who can handle complex scenarios, it given half a chance.<br />
Couching everything in loFty terminology (like democracy)  creates unwarranted expections.  Then, no matter what is done or not done looks like duplicity.<br />
A little straight talk, PLEASE<br />
.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudi</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16186/bush-reaffirms-and-increases-verbal-support-of-pakistans-musharraf/comment-page-1/#comment-105608</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/bush-administration/16186/bush-reaffirms-and-increases-verbal-support-of-pakistans-musharraf/#comment-105608</guid>
		<description>back a few years there was something substantial the BDS administration could have done about the &quot;loose nukes&quot; . They screwed that up like so many other things.
http://www.armscontrolwonk.com/1709/no-pals-for-paks
&lt;blockquote&gt;No PALs For Paks
posted Saturday November 17, 2007 under nuclear-weapons by jeffrey

Sanger and Broad definitively answer the question of whether the US shared Permissive Action Link technology with the Pakistanis (no):&lt;/blockquote&gt;
We didn&#039;t give our Paki friends PAL&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>back a few years there was something substantial the BDS administration could have done about the &#8220;loose nukes&#8221; . They screwed that up like so many other things.<br />
<a href="http://www.armscontrolwonk.com/1709/no-pals-for-paks" rel="nofollow">http://www.armscontrolwonk.com/1709/no-pals-for-paks</a></p>
<blockquote><p>No PALs For Paks<br />
posted Saturday November 17, 2007 under nuclear-weapons by jeffrey</p>
<p>Sanger and Broad definitively answer the question of whether the US shared Permissive Action Link technology with the Pakistanis (no):</p></blockquote>
<p>We didn&#8217;t give our Paki friends PAL&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: University Update - George W Bush - Bush Reaffirms And Increases Verbal Support Of Pakistan’s Musharraf</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16186/bush-reaffirms-and-increases-verbal-support-of-pakistans-musharraf/comment-page-1/#comment-105607</link>
		<dc:creator>University Update - George W Bush - Bush Reaffirms And Increases Verbal Support Of Pakistan’s Musharraf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/bush-administration/16186/bush-reaffirms-and-increases-verbal-support-of-pakistans-musharraf/#comment-105607</guid>
		<description>[...] Clark                           Bush Reaffirms And Increases Verbal Support Of Pakistan’s Musharraf &#187;  This Summary is from an article posted at The Moderate Voice » Domestic and international news [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Clark                           Bush Reaffirms And Increases Verbal Support Of Pakistan’s Musharraf &#187;  This Summary is from an article posted at The Moderate Voice » Domestic and international news [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Idiosyncrat</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16186/bush-reaffirms-and-increases-verbal-support-of-pakistans-musharraf/comment-page-1/#comment-105586</link>
		<dc:creator>Idiosyncrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/bush-administration/16186/bush-reaffirms-and-increases-verbal-support-of-pakistans-musharraf/#comment-105586</guid>
		<description>I think W. would do everyone a great service if he simply came out and said &quot;look, we&#039;re worried as heck about loose nukes and we think that Musharraf is the best bet to contain them.  Full stop.  End of story.&quot;  The rest is, uh, bull......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think W. would do everyone a great service if he simply came out and said &#8220;look, we&#8217;re worried as heck about loose nukes and we think that Musharraf is the best bet to contain them.  Full stop.  End of story.&#8221;  The rest is, uh, bull&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

