<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary Clinton&#8217;s Debate Rebound (UPDATED)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/16141/hillary-clintons-debate-rebound/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16141/hillary-clintons-debate-rebound/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:05:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: G. Hendricks</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16141/hillary-clintons-debate-rebound/comment-page-1/#comment-105355</link>
		<dc:creator>G. Hendricks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 18:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/john-edwards/16141/hillary-clintons-debate-rebound/#comment-105355</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Yeah, I know…. but in some states the Dems and Repubs work together much better than they do at the national level.&lt;/blockquote&gt; Not here in Pennsylvania. It&#039;s always a blood bath, just like at the national level. &lt;blockquote&gt;Not perfect, but that’s just the nature of politics.&lt;/blockquote&gt; Of course. It&#039;s a shame that a truly great candidate like John Edwards (just like Bill Bradley in 2000, and Wesley Clark in 2004), gets sidelined for Hillary Clinton, who I think is simply all of the bad aspects of her husband with none of the good ones. Obama would be good and seems to posess a magic political touch, but I still think that 2012 is the year for him.

Still, I always thought that the primary system is screwed up. By the time it gets to Pennsylvania, it&#039;ll be a finished and done deal. I think they should have the elections all on the same day...just like the general election. That way most everyone&#039;s vote will have some significance.

When will the American public learn?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Yeah, I know…. but in some states the Dems and Repubs work together much better than they do at the national level.</p></blockquote>
<p> Not here in Pennsylvania. It&#8217;s always a blood bath, just like at the national level.<br />
<blockquote>Not perfect, but that’s just the nature of politics.</p></blockquote>
<p> Of course. It&#8217;s a shame that a truly great candidate like John Edwards (just like Bill Bradley in 2000, and Wesley Clark in 2004), gets sidelined for Hillary Clinton, who I think is simply all of the bad aspects of her husband with none of the good ones. Obama would be good and seems to posess a magic political touch, but I still think that 2012 is the year for him.</p>
<p>Still, I always thought that the primary system is screwed up. By the time it gets to Pennsylvania, it&#8217;ll be a finished and done deal. I think they should have the elections all on the same day&#8230;just like the general election. That way most everyone&#8217;s vote will have some significance.</p>
<p>When will the American public learn?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StockBoySF</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16141/hillary-clintons-debate-rebound/comment-page-1/#comment-105353</link>
		<dc:creator>StockBoySF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 18:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/john-edwards/16141/hillary-clintons-debate-rebound/#comment-105353</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I know.... but in some states the Dems and Repubs work together much better than they do at the national level.  Not perfect, but that&#039;s just the nature of politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I know&#8230;. but in some states the Dems and Repubs work together much better than they do at the national level.  Not perfect, but that&#8217;s just the nature of politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G. Hendricks</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16141/hillary-clintons-debate-rebound/comment-page-1/#comment-105341</link>
		<dc:creator>G. Hendricks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 12:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/john-edwards/16141/hillary-clintons-debate-rebound/#comment-105341</guid>
		<description>I agree, but that&#039;ll never happen. Money and power trump reform and actual progress in politics. Didn&#039;t you know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, but that&#8217;ll never happen. Money and power trump reform and actual progress in politics. Didn&#8217;t you know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StockBoySF</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16141/hillary-clintons-debate-rebound/comment-page-1/#comment-105331</link>
		<dc:creator>StockBoySF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 07:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/john-edwards/16141/hillary-clintons-debate-rebound/#comment-105331</guid>
		<description>What happened to Mike Gravel?  Did he finally give up because the race is taking so long this time and he wanted to finally retire while he had a few years left?

I&#039;m not a Biden supporter (but not against him, either) but I thought this was one of his better debates.

I was interested in seeing how Obama would perform in his new &quot;aggressive&quot; mode against Hillary.  He was definitely trying on the mantle to see how it fit and it definitely needs some nips and tucks.  But whoever the eventual Democractic candidate is, they will need lots of practice with this for the general election.  With such an unpopular Republican Prez i office and the state of the union being what it is, the Republican candidates feel threatened and desperately want to hold on to power.  The Republicans will be particularly more vicious in going after their Dem. opponent.

Speaking of which, it will be interesting to see how ferocious the Republicans will be toward a new Dem. Prez. (assuming the next Prez is a Dem).  I bet the Republicans will really go after him/her with everything they have.  Instead everyone (Dem. and Repub.) should be concentrating on working with the new administration and repairing the damage of the last few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to Mike Gravel?  Did he finally give up because the race is taking so long this time and he wanted to finally retire while he had a few years left?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a Biden supporter (but not against him, either) but I thought this was one of his better debates.</p>
<p>I was interested in seeing how Obama would perform in his new &#8220;aggressive&#8221; mode against Hillary.  He was definitely trying on the mantle to see how it fit and it definitely needs some nips and tucks.  But whoever the eventual Democractic candidate is, they will need lots of practice with this for the general election.  With such an unpopular Republican Prez i office and the state of the union being what it is, the Republican candidates feel threatened and desperately want to hold on to power.  The Republicans will be particularly more vicious in going after their Dem. opponent.</p>
<p>Speaking of which, it will be interesting to see how ferocious the Republicans will be toward a new Dem. Prez. (assuming the next Prez is a Dem).  I bet the Republicans will really go after him/her with everything they have.  Instead everyone (Dem. and Repub.) should be concentrating on working with the new administration and repairing the damage of the last few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G. Hendricks</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16141/hillary-clintons-debate-rebound/comment-page-1/#comment-105287</link>
		<dc:creator>G. Hendricks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 14:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/john-edwards/16141/hillary-clintons-debate-rebound/#comment-105287</guid>
		<description>I disagree with the media. Although Senator Clinton did go into attack dog mode, she still didn&#039;t do very well. She still can&#039;t answer questions clearly (look at her response to NAFTA), she&#039;s still clearly out-of-touch with the working class, and she&#039;s &lt;em&gt;still&lt;/em&gt; planting questions. She would make a terrible Prez. Four more years is what we get with her.

John Edwards sees her for the phony she is, and can answer difficult complex questions, can take the heat, and clearly understands the working class&#039;s needs. He is not simply a Republican Lite like she is. Her health care plan puts unrestricted &quot;freedoms&quot; on the health insurance company (i.e. they can still charge you sky-high prices and screw you), whereas Edwards is going to give &lt;em&gt;them&lt;/em&gt; hell. She has no vision for the future, whereas he does. She will leave the White House just as divided as it is now, whereas Edwards will unite it. He proposes massive reform, she proposes maintaining the status quo.

It&#039;s clear who&#039;s better for the American public and who I&#039;m voting for. Go Edwards!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with the media. Although Senator Clinton did go into attack dog mode, she still didn&#8217;t do very well. She still can&#8217;t answer questions clearly (look at her response to NAFTA), she&#8217;s still clearly out-of-touch with the working class, and she&#8217;s <em>still</em> planting questions. She would make a terrible Prez. Four more years is what we get with her.</p>
<p>John Edwards sees her for the phony she is, and can answer difficult complex questions, can take the heat, and clearly understands the working class&#8217;s needs. He is not simply a Republican Lite like she is. Her health care plan puts unrestricted &#8220;freedoms&#8221; on the health insurance company (i.e. they can still charge you sky-high prices and screw you), whereas Edwards is going to give <em>them</em> hell. She has no vision for the future, whereas he does. She will leave the White House just as divided as it is now, whereas Edwards will unite it. He proposes massive reform, she proposes maintaining the status quo.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s clear who&#8217;s better for the American public and who I&#8217;m voting for. Go Edwards!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: University Update - Barack Obama - Hillary Clinton’s Debate Rebound</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/16141/hillary-clintons-debate-rebound/comment-page-1/#comment-105276</link>
		<dc:creator>University Update - Barack Obama - Hillary Clinton’s Debate Rebound</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 07:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/john-edwards/16141/hillary-clintons-debate-rebound/#comment-105276</guid>
		<description>[...] Clark                           Hillary Clinton’s Debate Rebound &#187;  This Summary is from an article posted at The Moderate Voice » Domestic and international news [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Clark                           Hillary Clinton’s Debate Rebound &#187;  This Summary is from an article posted at The Moderate Voice » Domestic and international news [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

