Comments on: Showdown At Las Vegas Debate For Hillary Clinton http://themoderatevoice.com/16117/showdown-at-las-vegas-debate-for-hillary-clinton/ An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:12:34 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Showdown At Las Vegas Debate For Hillary Clinton | Political news - democrats republicans socialists greens liberals conservatives http://themoderatevoice.com/16117/showdown-at-las-vegas-debate-for-hillary-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-105280 Showdown At Las Vegas Debate For Hillary Clinton | Political news - democrats republicans socialists greens liberals conservatives Sat, 17 Nov 2007 09:50:10 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/general/16117/showdown-at-las-vegas-debate-for-hillary-clinton/#comment-105280 [...] post by Joe Gandelman This was written by . Posted on Thursday, November 15, 2007, at 1:13 pm. Filed under [...] [...] post by Joe Gandelman This was written by . Posted on Thursday, November 15, 2007, at 1:13 pm. Filed under [...]

]]> By: DLS http://themoderatevoice.com/16117/showdown-at-las-vegas-debate-for-hillary-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-105078 DLS Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:23:23 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/general/16117/showdown-at-las-vegas-debate-for-hillary-clinton/#comment-105078 Clinton remains the favorite, by default, until proven otherwise. Her opponents have a large psychological hurdle to overcome. Clinton remains the favorite, by default, until proven otherwise. Her opponents have a large psychological hurdle to overcome.

]]> By: beaverton_jewboy http://themoderatevoice.com/16117/showdown-at-las-vegas-debate-for-hillary-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-105071 beaverton_jewboy Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:53:51 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/general/16117/showdown-at-las-vegas-debate-for-hillary-clinton/#comment-105071 wow, server problems. I always close my tags, lol, and don't press submit twice. Really. wow, server problems. I always close my tags, lol, and don’t press submit twice. Really.

]]> By: beaverton_jewboy http://themoderatevoice.com/16117/showdown-at-las-vegas-debate-for-hillary-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-105068 beaverton_jewboy Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:52:07 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/general/16117/showdown-at-las-vegas-debate-for-hillary-clinton/#comment-105068 Posts like these always make me crib from the Daily Howler. Let's be clear. At that debate, Russert and Williams egged on Clinton's rivals for two hours, asking them, point blank, whether Clinton was contradicting herself. Compare this with the Republican debate, where Romney says flat-out that Giuliani is lying, and Matthews just moves on. Then the media gets their grubby little paws on a perfectly reasonable answer to the driver license question, that it's not desireable but necessary, and twists it. Edwards and Obama play along, but let's <strong>stop disappearing the press in making stupid narratives and controversies.</strong><em> This is just a war on Clinton. The whole thing is stupid. It's more of the debased discourse that passes for politics in this country, and it's brought to us by a bunch of multimillionaire plutocrat journalists and the sniveling little "liberal" shits who repeat their trash to try to get ahead. Hence Joe says, "The conventional wisdom has spoken." Indeed. The way I see it, Hil made a reasonable answer that got twisted and hyped, then a staffer made a stupid error. Where was the furor when Giuliani's South Carolina <strong>campaign chairman</strong> was busted for <strong>selling coke</strong>? Why are there two standards for errors and ambiguity, a harsh one for Clinton and Edwards, and a light one for Republicans? Why, it's the <em>conventional wisdom</em>, silly! Posts like these always make me crib from the Daily Howler. Let’s be clear. At that debate, Russert and Williams egged on Clinton’s rivals for two hours, asking them, point blank, whether Clinton was contradicting herself. Compare this with the Republican debate, where Romney says flat-out that Giuliani is lying, and Matthews just moves on.

Then the media gets their grubby little paws on a perfectly reasonable answer to the driver license question, that it’s not desireable but necessary, and twists it. Edwards and Obama play along, but let’s stop disappearing the press in making stupid narratives and controversies.

This is just a war on Clinton. The whole thing is stupid. It’s more of the debased discourse that passes for politics in this country, and it’s brought to us by a bunch of multimillionaire plutocrat journalists and the sniveling little “liberal” shits who repeat their trash to try to get ahead.

Hence Joe says, “The conventional wisdom has spoken.” Indeed. The way I see it, Hil made a reasonable answer that got twisted and hyped, then a staffer made a stupid error. Where was the furor when Giuliani’s South Carolina campaign chairman was busted for selling coke? Why are there two standards for errors and ambiguity, a harsh one for Clinton and Edwards, and a light one for Republicans? Why, it’s the conventional wisdom, silly!

]]> By: beaverton_jewboy http://themoderatevoice.com/16117/showdown-at-las-vegas-debate-for-hillary-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-105069 beaverton_jewboy Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:52:07 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/general/16117/showdown-at-las-vegas-debate-for-hillary-clinton/#comment-105069 Posts like these always make me crib from the Daily Howler. Let's be clear. At that debate, Russert and Williams egged on Clinton's rivals for two hours, asking them, point blank, whether Clinton was contradicting herself. Compare this with the Republican debate, where Romney says flat-out that Giuliani is lying, and Matthews just moves on. Then the media gets their grubby little paws on a perfectly reasonable answer to the driver license question, that it's not desireable but necessary, and twists it. Edwards and Obama play along, but let's <strong>stop disappearing the press in making stupid narratives and controversies.</strong><em> This is just a war on Clinton. The whole thing is stupid. It's more of the debased discourse that passes for politics in this country, and it's brought to us by a bunch of multimillionaire plutocrat journalists and the sniveling little "liberal" shits who repeat their trash to try to get ahead. Hence Joe says, "The conventional wisdom has spoken." Indeed. The way I see it, Hil made a reasonable answer that got twisted and hyped, then a staffer made a stupid error. Where was the furor when Giuliani's South Carolina <strong>campaign chairman</strong> was busted for <strong>selling coke</strong>? Why are there two standards for errors and ambiguity, a harsh one for Clinton and Edwards, and a light one for Republicans? Why, it's the <em>conventional wisdom</em>, silly! Posts like these always make me crib from the Daily Howler. Let’s be clear. At that debate, Russert and Williams egged on Clinton’s rivals for two hours, asking them, point blank, whether Clinton was contradicting herself. Compare this with the Republican debate, where Romney says flat-out that Giuliani is lying, and Matthews just moves on.

Then the media gets their grubby little paws on a perfectly reasonable answer to the driver license question, that it’s not desireable but necessary, and twists it. Edwards and Obama play along, but let’s stop disappearing the press in making stupid narratives and controversies.

This is just a war on Clinton. The whole thing is stupid. It’s more of the debased discourse that passes for politics in this country, and it’s brought to us by a bunch of multimillionaire plutocrat journalists and the sniveling little “liberal” shits who repeat their trash to try to get ahead.

Hence Joe says, “The conventional wisdom has spoken.” Indeed. The way I see it, Hil made a reasonable answer that got twisted and hyped, then a staffer made a stupid error. Where was the furor when Giuliani’s South Carolina campaign chairman was busted for selling coke? Why are there two standards for errors and ambiguity, a harsh one for Clinton and Edwards, and a light one for Republicans? Why, it’s the conventional wisdom, silly!

]]> By: University Update - Barack Obama - Showdown At Las Vegas Debate For Hillary Clinton http://themoderatevoice.com/16117/showdown-at-las-vegas-debate-for-hillary-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-105060 University Update - Barack Obama - Showdown At Las Vegas Debate For Hillary Clinton Thu, 15 Nov 2007 21:52:32 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/general/16117/showdown-at-las-vegas-debate-for-hillary-clinton/#comment-105060 [...] Clark Showdown At Las Vegas Debate For Hillary Clinton » This Summary is from an article posted at The Moderate Voice » Domestic and international news [...] [...] Clark Showdown At Las Vegas Debate For Hillary Clinton » This Summary is from an article posted at The Moderate Voice » Domestic and international news [...]

]]> By: Cheap Tickets: Airline, SuperBowl, Concert, Event Tickets » Showdown At Las Vegas Debate For Hillary Clinton http://themoderatevoice.com/16117/showdown-at-las-vegas-debate-for-hillary-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-105048 Cheap Tickets: Airline, SuperBowl, Concert, Event Tickets » Showdown At Las Vegas Debate For Hillary Clinton Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:11:52 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/general/16117/showdown-at-las-vegas-debate-for-hillary-clinton/#comment-105048 [...] AceShowbiz.com had some great ideas on this topic.You can read a snippet of the post here.Clinton — not bloodied, not wounded, but no longer the inevitable nominee with awesome polls in both some upcoming primaries or early general election matchup scenarios — faces a real showdown in Las Vegas. Another debate. … [...] [...] AceShowbiz.com had some great ideas on this topic.You can read a snippet of the post here.Clinton — not bloodied, not wounded, but no longer the inevitable nominee with awesome polls in both some upcoming primaries or early general election matchup scenarios — faces a real showdown in Las Vegas. Another debate. … [...]

]]>