An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right

“I Veto, Therefore I Am”

That’s the new theme of the Bush Administration.

In 1948, Harry Truman got to the White House by railing against a Republican “do-nothing” Congress, and George W. Bush is using the tactic in an effort to stay “relevant” as he prepares to leave the Oval Office.

“Congress has little to show for all the time that has gone by,” he complained at his last press conference, a bizarre charge for a President who has vetoed Iraq appropriations bills, S-CHIP health insurance and this week is threatening to send back a water projects bill with enough bipartisan support to override his veto.

There is a kind of spoiled-rich-kid intransigence to the new Bush that is consistent with his behavior for six years when Republicans controlled both Houses and rubber-stamped whatever he wanted. Now, in the face of opposition, he is stamping his feet and threatening to hold his breath if he doesn’t get his way.

“He may decide that all he wants to do is veto and stop progress,” says Rep. Rahm Emanuel, head of the House Democratic Caucus. “But everybody will know who wants to change things, and who wants to keep them just the way they are.”

But if Congressional Democrats are confident that voters will make that distinction next year, they should look closely at their approval ratings, which are lower than the President’s.

To dramatize his claims about a do-nothing Congress, Harry Truman had called a special session on what was known as “Turnip Planting Day” in Missouri. His opponents obliged with inaction and made his point.

If today’s Democrats want to avoid looking like turnips in ’08, they had better start moving now.

Cross-posted from my blog.



opinions powered by SendLove.to

3 Responses to ““I Veto, Therefore I Am””

  1. I thought that Truman got to the White House in 1945 because FDR died.

  2. Robert Stein says:

    He did, but he was elected on his own in 1948. Tough old bird

  3. Mikef says:

    But if Congressional Democrats are confident that voters will make that distinction next year, they should look closely at their approval ratings, which are lower than the President’s.

    Not according to this poll (taken October 26th):

    Approval of congressional Democrats stands at 43 percent, twice that of Congress in general.

    And of course, polls asking who the public agrees with on issues of the war, the economy, and health care also show strong support for the Democratic position, not the president’s.

    The approval of Congress has been falling because they’ve caved in to Bush, not because they’ve opposed him. The numbers started slipping after they decided to give Bush a blank check for the “surge” last Spring. Later capitulation of FISA didn’t help either.

© 2003-2011 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Mode Equity