It really looks like a “beat Clinton” strategy rather than promotion of the interests of social conservatives.

Meanwhile, yesterday produced winners and losers and much of the public still seems positive about having voted for Dems in 2006.

What’s laughable is that Mitt Romney, who is similar to Giuliani in being much less than truly conservative, presents himself as a “real conservative,” and has gotten nothing from the social-conservative [celebrities]

Weyrich to the rescue

Mitt Romney offers Americans…nothing but a smile. And the people who would vote for someone because of his or her smile are for Obama (with Edwards and Clinton behind Obama).

Who cares who Pat Robertson endorses because the Republican nominee has so little chance of winning in the general election.

The Left “cares” more about what Robertson and the rest of the Religious Right says than anybody else, particularly us mainstream voters, who don’t blow up the Religious Right into some kind of demonic monster to compete with Bush in the psychotic-behavior-object department.

A McCain nomination would lead to a massive rout. McCain burned his bridges with the core of the Republican party when he supported amnesty. Funding raising would collapse for the Republicans and many would stay home when faced with a McCain v Clinton ticket. It would probably be worse than Dole-Clinton in 1996.

Maybe a better use of time would be who Senator Clinton’s Attorney General will be and what their opinion is on international surveillance or waterboarding or what status should be given to someone who is not in uniform and attacking the U.S. Military?

When a prominent, founding member of the RR “stoops” to endorse a clear pro-choice, pro-gay candidate, it would seem to suggest they’ve now fully sacrificed principles for politics

Shaun outdid Robertson with his latest GOP-bashing.