Comments on: Prez Candidate Sex Scandal In Offing?

By: Editor from LAT, the paper that missed the Villaraigosa scandal under their nose assures us all there’s nothing to see here « docweaselblog

Sat, 03 Nov 2007 08:32:37 +0000

[...] The LA Times Is Sitting On A Sex Scandal Involving A â€œLeading Candidateâ€ The Moderate Voice: Prez Candidate Sex Scandal In Offing? LA Observed: Rosenbaum’s rumor [...]

By: Update on the Prez Sex Scandal Rumor » The Moderate Voice

Update on the Prez Sex Scandal Rumor » The Moderate Voice — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:16:46 +0000

[...] noted here yesterday, PajamasMedia blogger Ron Rosenbaum did a pretty good job of airing out the outlines of [...]

By: kritt

kritt — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 02:32:33 +0000

Its not Hillary- according to the LATimes the affair occurred 20 years ago. Its not Giuliani either, as he’s had multiple affairs and marriages.

By: Holly in Cincinnati

Holly in Cincinnati — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:43:58 +0000

PLEASE NOTE:

Please read our comment guidelines below. Focus on actual issues.

By: When Reporters pretend to still have any ethics or journalistic standards left « docweaselblog

Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:16:00 +0000

[...] Involving A â€œLeading Candidateâ€ Roger Simon: It’s immigration, stupid! Moderate Voice: Prez Candidate Sex Scandal In Offing? Patterico: L.A. Times Sitting on a Sex Scandal?? Mickey Kaus: Dark Star My Election Analysis If [...]

By: hillaryandhuma

hillaryandhuma — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:47:23 +0000

According to the Village Voice gossip: “HILLARY CLINTON is GAYLE KINGâ€“ing her aide de camp, the glamorous HUMA ABEDIN”
http://www.villagevoice.com/nyclife/0732,musto,77465,15.html

According to Blogger: “Hillary relationship with one of her top aides Huma Abedin”
http://bigheaddc.com/2007/10/31/la-times-sitting-on-an-explosive-prez-candidate-sex-story/

By: kritt

kritt — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 20:17:44 +0000

In this day and age, and given the length of the campaign and focus on individual candidates foibles, there probably is no way to hush up any secret scandal for good. You can affect the election with the timing of its release, however. Just look at the results of the Foley mess.

By: egrubs

egrubs — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:58:16 +0000

The problem is with the first focus: why bother researching the scandal in the first place? Hiding the information once it’s information is silly. You might as well publish it and watch the people scream at this point.

By: domajot

domajot — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:17:13 +0000

We should take a tip from Sarkozy.
Secual scandals do not endanger national security, and the one man, one woman plus 2.4 children behind a picket fence story was always a myth.

BTW. who ist it, and what did he/she do? (Snicker)

Seriously, I don’t care!

By: beaverton_jewboy

beaverton_jewboy — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:47:39 +0000

I love the fact that Shaun can pimp stupid sex scandals, repeat that retarded meme about haircuts, quote Pajamas Media for chrissakes, and people still call him a liberal.

The media’s coverage of this country’s elections is already worthless. Yet more media BS is irrelevant.

Rudy lies through his teeth. He’s a giant liar.

By: Rambie

Rambie — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:29:27 +0000

Now they are splitting hairs on this, where was this soul searching 10-years ago? If it was good enough for President Clinton then, it’s good enough for this candidate now. Assuming the story is well sourced and not just a rumor.

I know some will make the case about the candidate’s integrity, honesty, etc and to some extent that is true. However, I DO NOT CARE. I didn’t care with Clinton and I don’t really care now, no matter who it is.