An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right

Distraught San Diego Fire Refugees Show Patience At Qualcomm Stadium

For most of them, they aren’t far away from home.

Yet, they’re a world away.

Some of the adults look stunned. And some of the kids look overwhelmed.

You can see literally thousands of them here in San Diego’s Qualcomm Stadium, the 71,500 seat football stadium that normally hosts happier events, such as San Diego Chargers football games and rock concerts.

But this time the massive stadium built 40 years ago isn’t hosting boisterous, tailgating, sometimes combative Chargers fans. Now, it’s a makeshift refuge for San Diegans of all income levels and all religious, ethnic nationalities and political persuasions — and of all ages.

This time, the stadium’s 18,500 parking spaces aren’t dotted with fired-up people “tailgating” by grilling hotdogs and hamburgers but with fire-chased people — some of them with uneasy looking displaced pets. These people sit in beach chairs next to cars filled to the brims, or under canopies of two person tents sleeping bags.

This time, it isn’t friends who come over to the people in these spaces to playfully steal a beer but volunteers of all ages including diligent San Diego teens handing out coloring books, canned food, water and offering news on cots that’ll be available later in the night. This time, the uniformed people aren’t stadium security people but tirelessly working National Guardsmen unloading huge bags of food, used clothing, emergency bedding and other supplies from big trucks.

TO READ THE FULL POST GO HERE



opinions powered by SendLove.to

2 Responses to “Distraught San Diego Fire Refugees Show Patience At Qualcomm Stadium”

  1. Lynx says:

    I was thinking of avoiding this kind of comment, but so much news about refugees in stadiums makes me not able to help myself.

    Am I the only one remembering Katrina?

    Yes I know that the disaster was more massive in that case, but still, the difference in reactions, in order and organization and consequences is intriguing, at least. It’s a massive disaster, requiring massive mobilization of resources and huge evacuations. So far at least, there’s no news of people going hungry or thirsty, of old people being left to die, of not having enough National Guards or fire-fighters. Seemingly, everything that can humanly be done is being done. Is the difference really just about the different magnitude of the disaster? Or are there other differences? The people evacuated being better informed and with more resources, the coordination of governments at local and state level being more fluid, the resources allotted being more abundant. What is it?

  2. JSpencer says:

    I think Lynx raises a fair question, and is one I haven’t heard yet. I think it’s too early to answer, but as time goes on I suspect the comparison will be one we see brought up more and more.

© 2003-2011 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Mode Equity