<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Huckabee, Another Jimmy Carter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/15691/huckabee-another-jimmy-carter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/15691/huckabee-another-jimmy-carter/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:38:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elrod</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/15691/huckabee-another-jimmy-carter/comment-page-1/#comment-102658</link>
		<dc:creator>Elrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 01:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/15691/huckabee-another-jimmy-carter/#comment-102658</guid>
		<description>Hucakabee seems like a natural fit. But he&#039;s got a few problems: one, he&#039;s a protectionist, which is anathema in today&#039;s GOP. Two, he&#039;s got no money. Third, he&#039;s not a vicious partisan (he even praised the Clintons). Fourth, his name is Huckabee, which might be even more &quot;unpresidential&quot; than Obama (a terrible reason, of course, but Dan Bartlett made this point and I think he&#039;s right).  I thought Huckabee would be a bigger contender than he&#039;s been. He&#039;s the natural choice for the Christian Right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hucakabee seems like a natural fit. But he&#8217;s got a few problems: one, he&#8217;s a protectionist, which is anathema in today&#8217;s GOP. Two, he&#8217;s got no money. Third, he&#8217;s not a vicious partisan (he even praised the Clintons). Fourth, his name is Huckabee, which might be even more &#8220;unpresidential&#8221; than Obama (a terrible reason, of course, but Dan Bartlett made this point and I think he&#8217;s right).  I thought Huckabee would be a bigger contender than he&#8217;s been. He&#8217;s the natural choice for the Christian Right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: domajot</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/15691/huckabee-another-jimmy-carter/comment-page-1/#comment-102645</link>
		<dc:creator>domajot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/15691/huckabee-another-jimmy-carter/#comment-102645</guid>
		<description>Huchabee as the Rep candidate would be a gift to the Democrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huchabee as the Rep candidate would be a gift to the Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Satterfield</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/15691/huckabee-another-jimmy-carter/comment-page-1/#comment-102644</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Satterfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/15691/huckabee-another-jimmy-carter/#comment-102644</guid>
		<description>Huckabee represents the Religious Right well. If you like Supreme Court justices like Scalia, Thomas and Roberts maybe he is your guy. But if he did get the nomination I really doubt that he&#039;d be able to draw anyone outside the Republican Party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huckabee represents the Religious Right well. If you like Supreme Court justices like Scalia, Thomas and Roberts maybe he is your guy. But if he did get the nomination I really doubt that he&#8217;d be able to draw anyone outside the Republican Party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
