« With Enemies Like This, General Petraeus Gets New Friends
General Petraeus Lowers Already Low Expectations in Iraq Even Further »
To read my opinion of the testimony of General Petraeus and ambassador Crocker please click here. To sum it up: a sober assessment, both men seemed to be honest; they mentioned the problems but also expressed believe that progress has been made (slowly but surely); all in all a good, realistic assessment of the situation on the ground. It seems to me that people cannot easily dismiss what the two had to say.
In the post, I also respond to the ridiculous, over-the-top advertisement placed by MoveOn in today’s New York Times. MoveOn basically labeled General Petraeus a traitor.
Michael – Where are the facts that Patraeus promised when he was confirmed? He said he would use metrics – where are the specifics that back up his claims? It was nothing more than a bunch of subjective opinions that once again we are supposed to take on faith.
Sorry, but I have been burned before by this administration. I want names, dates, locations and numbers to back up every one of his statements. Am I just suppossed to swallow this hook, line and sinker like when Powell spoke?
Both sides are wrong to throw out “traitor” to silence the opposition. Townhall was just as wrong with this:
But I do believe the likes of Bill Bennett and the Hannity’s started the traitor slander. You are only a traitor when you help the enemy against the troops, not by voicing dissent from either side.
[...] some folks who didn't like my particular take on the MoveOn smear on General David Petraeus. There are some who agree. Oddly enough, those who agree that MoveOn was over the top on this happen to be [...]