Romney’s Unmaid Mind
WASHINGTON — Sí, se puede. Yes, it can be done.
President Obama showed last week that it’s possible to find a reasonable, humane solution for at least 800,000 young people who were illegally brought into this country as children. All you need is a moral compass and a heart.
Seems to me that Obama’s unilateral decision to let these noncitizens remain here without fear of deportation should have quieted critics who bray and whine about a supposed lack of bold presidential leadership. It didn’t, of course.
Republicans immediately — and cynically — charged that the president’s move was purely political, aimed at boosting his chances of re-election. Polls show that Latino voters care passionately about immigration reform. If Obama’s initiative energizes and motivates this key segment, which already supports him by about 2-to-1, it becomes much tougher to defeat the president in the fall.
But if taking action on the immigration issue is good politics for Obama and the Democrats, then Republicans have only themselves to blame. The GOP has made a conscious decision to offer nativists and xenophobes a comfortable home where their extremist views go unchallenged. No one should be surprised if voters who think differently about immigration issues — including some who are recent immigrants themselves — feel unwelcome.
Where is Mitt Romney on all of this, you ask? Excellent question. Former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s withering putdown in 2009 of David Cameron, the current prime minister, is perfect to describe Romney: “The more he talks, the less he actually says.”
Predictably, Romney was critical of Obama’s action, saying he should not have resorted to a “stopgap” measure when a long-term solution is needed. Indeed, the new policy will require qualified immigrants to re-apply for permission to live and work here every two years. And since Obama created the policy by executive fiat, a future president could simply rescind it — which is just what a President Romney would do, right?
Who knows? On Sunday’s “Face the Nation,” Bob Schieffer asked Romney that question four times. Romney steadfastly refused to give a straight answer.
Romney’s first nonresponse began: “Well, let’s step back and, and look at the issue … ”
The second: “Well, as, as you know, he was, he was president for the last three and a half years, did nothing on immigration … ”
The third, which is my personal favorite: “Well, it would be overtaken by events, if you will, by virtue of my putting in place a long-term solution with, with legislation which creates law that relates to these individuals such that they know what their setting is going to be … ”
And the fourth and final nonanswer: “We’ll, we’ll look at that … ”
As usual, it is hard to know what truth Romney is trying so hard to avoid telling. Does he really believe the hard-line rhetoric on immigration he used during the primaries to inoculate himself against persistent allegations of moderation? If that’s the case, his hemming and hawing was to avoid further alienating Latinos by saying forthrightly that he would rescind Obama’s policy.
The young men and women in question were brought here before they were old enough to have any say in the matter. They grew up in American neighborhoods, attended American schools — and, in some cases, were not even aware they were here illegally until they reached driving age and tried to apply for a license. Romney, if his primary-season rhetoric is to be believed, would offer most of them a choice between deportation and “self-deportation.”
It’s also possible, however, that Romney was trying to conceal how close his real views on immigration are to Obama’s. After all, Romney is nothing if not a reliable mouthpiece for the business community, sectors of which rely heavily on immigrant labor. Romney’s meaningless blather may be just to avoid acknowledging that Obama took a brave and eminently reasonable step.
Despite what Romney claims, he knows Congress isn’t going to produce comprehensive immigration reform anytime soon. By taking executive action, Obama might or might not have broken the logjam. But at least the president gave hope and a bit of security to hundreds of thousands of young people who — whatever you think of the adults who brought them here — are utterly blameless.
It’s tiresome having to spend so much time trying to figure out what Romney really believes. If anything, I mean.
Eugene Robinson’s email address is eugenerobinson@washpost.com. (c) 2012, Washington Post Writers Group
Share This
Amen!
This highlights one of the mysteries to me. Presumably anyone who is planning on voting GOP is not happy with Obama’s term. And there is good cause as Obama has dropped the ball on many issues. However, he has also done a number of things right, but obviously we are focusing on what he did wrong. So assuming that these are the things bothering voters, what proof of any sort is there that Romney is going to be any more capable of doing things than Obama? The guy doesn’t even have his own gameplan at all. What he does have is ripped right out of the playbook of the guy who screwed things up in the first place.
So yea, I get why people would be looking to replace Obama. I just don’t get with all we’ve seen of him, why anyone would think Romney is the guy to replace him with.
In 1932, during the depths of the depression, President Hoover created nearly two million jobs for desperate American workers by repatriating two million illegal Mexican immigrants. President Hoover CARED about jobs for unemployed Americans.
In 1947, faced with high levels of unemployment among returning U.S. Servicemen, President Harry S. Truman acted boldly and decisively by deporting over one million illegal immigrants, creating at thousands of jobs for American workers. President Truman CARED about jobs for American workers!
In 1954, President Eisenhower, concerned about high levels of unemployment among returning servicement from Korea, initiated Operation Wetback, repatriating about 1.3 million illegal aliens, and creating thousands of jobs for American workers. President Eisenhower CARED about jobs for unemployed American workers.
Today, both parties could care less about jobs for American workers. Speaker of the House Bohner, Eric Cantor, and their Republican buddies are determined to kill H.R. 2885, The Legal Workforce Act, and our feckless, irresponsible president thinks that giving work permits to nearly a million foreign citizens who are renegades from the overpopulated hellhole that is much of Latin America will get him a few Latino votes in some battleground states. All of these “humane” arguments simply don’t fly with the millions of American workers who desperately need the jobs these renegades are stealing. It may come as a surprize to the Washington Post, but the overwhelming majority of Americans are opposed to BOTH the so-called “DREAM” Act, as well as the “pathway to citizenship” nonsense as well. THERE IS A REASON WHY THESE AWFUL ACTS have FAILED to pass Congress, and the reason is the American People are opposed to this garbage.
These illegals you are speaking of Bill are kids who grew up here, have at least a high school degree, and no criminal record. If we could once take pride in “give us your poor, your tired, your hungry…” can we not also take pride in “give us your educated, your integrated, your law abiding..”? I think we can.