A penny, that coin destined to be tossed into drawers, given as tips to waitresses who don’t do a good job, or saved in jars and spitefully paid for a big purchase at your least favorite store, is now more unpopular for a specific reason:
Making pennies now just doesn’t make sense:
The U.S. penny is not what it appears to be, and some in Congress would like to see it change further, if not disappear entirely.
Because of a surge in the price of copper, the U.S. Mint decided 25 years ago to manufacture the coins almost entirely with zinc, save for the coating on which Abraham Lincoln’s profile is engraved.
Now, the fate of the penny is up in the air once again. With the price of zinc soaring amid a worldwide commodities boom, it costs the government about 1.7 cents to make each 1-cent coin — a pretty penny considering roughly 8 billion new ones are placed into circulation annually.
Never underestimate the ability of the government to find a way to lose money or spend money — even when literally making money. AND:
While it is unlikely the penny will be pulled from circulation, there are some lawmakers who would like to ditch zinc as a raw material and instead use steel or some other less expensive metal.
The nation’s sole supplier of zinc “penny blanks,†Jarden Zinc Products, is lobbying the federal government to protect its interests.
The subsidiary of Rye, N.Y.- based Jarden Corp., last year paid $180,000 to the law firm Baker & Daniels to fight legislation that would have allowed retailers to round off cash transactions to the nearest nickel, effectively creating a penniless society. Fortunately for Jarden, the House legislation did not gain traction, and its author, Rep. Jim Kolbe, R-Ariz., has since retired.
In the past two weeks, however, bills in the House and Senate were proposed that would give the Treasury Department the power to decide — without congressional approval — the type of metals used for all coins. The bills’ authors said using cheaper metals to make pennies and nickels, which incidentally cost an estimated 10 cents each to produce, could save taxpayers $100 million annually.
In other words, don’t nickle and dime the Treasury.
It’s just common sense to give the Treasury that power “so we no longer have to spend so much money making our money,†Sen. Wayne Allard, R-Colo., a bill co-sponsor, said in a statement.
Jarden’s lobbyist in Washington, Mark Weller of the law firm Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal, said House staffers recently assured him the latest bills won’t open the door to another effort to rid the penny. “We’re satisfied, but we need to stay on top of that,†Weller said….
…..Francois Velde, a senior economist with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, said the federal government should rid the U.S. currency of pennies, or at the very least find a cheaper way to make them. Velde noted that equivalent coins in Canada, the United Kingdom and Europe are made from steel, which is roughly five times less expensive than zinc…..
…..The Mint spent nearly $100 million manufacturing pennies in 2006, based on a 1.2 cent perpenny cost at the time. The cost has risen to 1.7 cents per coin in 2007, according to the Mint……
Weller, who has long lobbied for the penny with a group called Americans for Common Cents, argues the penny is good for the economy. Its absence, he said, would lead retailers to raise prices, influencing inflation. Weller also said past polls have shown a majority of Americans favor the coin, which was first produced in the United States in the 1790s.
Which one of the Presidential candidates will come out against the penny. Probably none. Every candidate wants to be seen as the candidate of change…