Earth Day and “Paradise Lost”

Today, April 22 is Earth Day, a day designated to increase national and global awareness and appreciation of our planet’s natural environment.

Earth Day Network:

The first Earth Day on April 22, 1970, activated 20 million Americans from all walks of life and is widely credited with launching the modern environmental movement. The passage of the landmark Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Endangered Species Act and many other groundbreaking environmental laws soon followed. Growing out of the first Earth Day, Earth Day Network (EDN) works with over 22,000 partners in 192 countries to broaden, diversify and mobilize the environmental movement. More than 1 billion people now participate in Earth Day activities each year, making it the largest civic observance in the world.

Having been fortunate enough to enjoy the pristine rain forests of my native Ecuador — El Oriente – when I was a young boy and aware of the damage that has been done to El Oriente and the irreparable damage that still threatens it, of course I support and celebrate Earth Day and all efforts to preserve and protect our fragile environment.

El Oriente is Ecuador’s magnificent jungle region on the East side of the majestic Andes Mountains. It is the beginning of the Amazon rain forest basin and one of the most biologically diverse regions on earth — an ecological miracle.

I wrote about this “Paradise Lost” almost a year ago lamenting the horrific environmental damage that was done in the 60s, 70s and 80s by the oil companies and describing the efforts by the Ecuadorean government and other nations and international organizations to prevent an even bigger environmental disaster from occurring in an even more delicate, more pristine and more biodiverse part of El Oriente, the Yasuní National Park.

Today, nearly one year later, the monumental class action lawsuit filed 19 years ago on behalf of 30,000 rainforest inhabitants against Chevron may be nearing an end. On the other hand, the efforts to save Yasuní are just beginning.

Here is part of my “Ecuador’s El Oriente — Another Paradise Lost?”, with some timeline updates :

My sister and I visited our parents in the Oriente during our school vacations in the late 1940s. My sister would chase the colorful, gigantic butterflies and admire the delicate, iridescent colibris, not realizing at the time that Ecuador has thousands of species of butterflies and is home to one of the largest profusions of hummingbirds in the world.

I would spend my days playing Tarzan, climbing some of the trees that reached for the sky, not knowing that the rainforest has 2,200 varieties of trees or that they are a critical part of our planet’s “lungs.” Of course, we knew that we had to be careful of poisonous snakes, frogs and certain plants. But we did not know then that such toxins and some chemicals from a treasure trove of “medicinal plants” would be used to make potent new medicines, powerful painkillers and — who knows — one day the wonder drugs that will cure cancer and other cruel diseases.

Our parents lived in a “company compound,” Shell Mera, on the banks of a river at the headwaters of the powerful Pastaza, which eventually disgorges into the mighty Amazon.

At the end of our delightful, adventure-packed days, my sister and I would listen to our father tell us about his latest encounter with some heretofore unknown animal or insect, or how one of the company planes had flown low over the huts of some indigenous tribe, visible through openings in the emerald canopy, and dropped beads and small mirrors trying to establish contact with the natives, only to see them raise their bows and arrows or point their spears and blowpipes at the airplane.

For my sister and me, our short visits to the Oriente were like trips to Paradise.

But soon there would be trouble in Paradise, and it would be spelled O-I-L.

You see, underneath the lush Ecuadorean rain forest lie some of the country’s largest oil deposits, Ecuador’s principal export and one of its most important sources of revenue — a resource that has been both a blessing and a curse.

Eventually, the oil company our father worked for, Shell, discovered the heavy, viscous oil below Ecuador’s rain forest but apparently decided that the extraction, transport and other logistics were not economically or technically feasible. After a few more years, the company pulled up stakes but, to its credit, left the rain forest of Ecuador pretty much as it had found it.

Others, however, would not be as kind to El Oriente.

In a damning New York Times opinion piece almost two years ago, Bob Herbert describes the new arrivals this way:

Texaco came barreling into this delicate ancient landscape in the early 1960s with all the subtlety and grace of an invading army. And when it left in 1992, it left behind, according to the lawsuit, widespread toxic contamination that devastated the livelihoods and traditions of the local people, and took a severe toll on their physical well-being.

The lawsuit mentioned by Herbert was filed 19 years ago on behalf of 30,000 rainforest inhabitants against Chevron, which had merged with Texaco.

A brief filed by the plaintiffs says:

[The company] deliberately dumped many billions of gallons of waste byproduct from oil drilling directly into the rivers and streams of the rainforest covering an area the size of Rhode Island. It gouged more than 900 unlined waste pits out of the jungle floor — pits which to this day leach toxic waste into soils and groundwater. It burned hundreds of millions of cubic feet of gas and waste oil into the atmosphere, poisoning the air and creating ‘black rain’ which inundated the area during tropical thunderstorms.

The unprecedented multi-billion dollar lawsuit will eventually be settled, in one way or another. However, the incalculable damage done to Ecuador’s Oriente will be with us — with the Ecuadorean people — for generations to come.

Deeper in Ecuador’s Amazon rain forest, at the border with Peru, lies an even more pristine region, the Yasuní National Park. The Park is a nearly 4,000-square-mile rainforest wilderness of incredible biodiversity and the ancestral land to two of the most isolated and “uncontacted” indigenous tribes, the Taromenane and the Tagaeri.

The region is so precious, so unique, that in 1989, Yasuní was designated a UNESCO “Man and the Biosphere Reserve.”

According to a 2010 research article in the Journal PLoS One, this “quadruple richness center” encompassing less than 0.5% of the Amazon Basin, has 150 amphibian species, “a world record,” and 121 species of reptiles. An average upland hectare in Yasuní contains 655 species of trees (more than the United States and Canada combined) and 100,000 species of insects. One section of the park holds at least 200 species of mammals, 247 amphibian and reptile species, and 550 species of birds, making the park the most biodiverse and the richest biological incubator on earth.

Yasuní is also home to a considerable number of endemic and endangered species, including several species of mammals and rare birds.

Sadly, because the Park sits atop an estimated 850 million to 1.3 billion barrels of oil reserves — Ecuador’s second largest untapped oil reserves — this fragile and irreplaceable habitat has become the next target for oil companies. Companies that each year wipe out approximately 600 square miles of Amazon rain forest for the sake of oil production.

But, finally, some sanity appears to be surfacing.

In an article in the Huffington Post, Johann Hari puts it this way:

Sometimes, there are hinge-points in human history — moments when we have to choose between an exuberant descent into lunacy, and a still, sober voice offering us a sane way out. Usually, we can only see them when we look back from a distance.

What Hari is referring to is Ecuador’s unprecedented and innovative plan — some call it crazy, unworkable, even “heresy” and blackmail — to leave the oil in the ground at Yasuní (estimated to be worth $7.2 billion) if the international community pledges to pay for half of the oil’s value, $3.6 billion. The money is to be used for the country’s sustainable social and economic development, for renewable energy, conservation and reforestation projects.

Not exploiting the oilfields in Yasuní will also benefit the global environment. For example, it would prevent the emission of approximately 410 million metric tons of carbon dioxide (equivalent to the annual emissions of France) which would result from burning the Yasuní fossil fuels.

Ecuador’s President Rafael Correa first presented this historic initiative to the world community in 2007.

Getting pledges for the Yasuní Ishpingo Tambococha Tiputini (ITT) Initiative (named after the three oil fields at Yasuní) has not been easy. A few countries have offered small amounts towards the Initiative’s fund. An initiative that has received mixed reviews, in Ecuador and elsewhere.

According to reports in 2011, Mr. Correa’s offer to leave the oil untapped is conditional on receiving the funds requested — and unless the first $100 million arrived by the end of 2011, he would begin extracting oil from Yasuní. (Fortunately, this has not happened yet).

Environmentalists and ecologists are keeping their fingers crossed. If this plan fails, it could mean even more destruction of Ecuador’s irreplaceable rain forest with dire consequences for Ecuador and for our planet.

Notes:
1. Patrick Radden Keefe wrote an excellent, objective article on the class action suit against Chevron in the January 9, 2012 issue of The New Yorker.

2. The Spring 2012 issue of Amazon Watch has an update here

3. Earth Day Network has a good summary of the campaign to save Yasuní here.

===
Photo by our late Father who wrote on the back: “Chief Taisha, of the Jivaro head hunters and his son, Segundo, with their 16-foot blowpipes, September 1948.”

Auf Stumbleupon zeigen
Auf tumblr zeigen

Author: DORIAN DE WIND, Military Affairs Columnist

  • RP

    Interesting the impact that humans have on the endangered forest throughout the world.

    Along with big oil and the impact shown in this article to be happening, what is the impact of the timber companies raping the forest for wood? Should we be allowing furniture to be built from wood when Gibson Guitar Company has had imported wood confiscated by the government because they think it is an endangered product? Is there also not an impact on the forest from the cattle industry clearing land for raising cattle for the growing demands for beef? Even McDonalds has been blamed for some of the distruction due to the billions of burgers sold.

    It is understandable that one industry can be singled out as the culpret for the distruction of the forest, but if oil is eliminated, will it really eliminate the impact of humans on that region?

    The human impact on the rain forest can not be isolated to one industry, but a complete package of protection has to be in place. If not, when one devil leaves, another will just take its place.

  • DORIAN DE WIND, Military Affairs Columnist

    Thanks for your comments, RP.

    You are right, “[T]he human impact on the rain forest cannot be isolated to one industry…”

    We have the lumber industry, agriculture, oil, mining, etc., etc, and the roads and infrastructure to support all these that are destroying the rain forest.

    As I said in my piece, the discovery of oil in Ecuador’s El Oriente, Ecuador’s principal export and one of its most important sources of revenue has become a resource “that has been both a blessing and a curse.”

    The world needs those resources, but they can be “harvested” in a more earth-friendly way.

    Just today an article appeared in my local newspaper by a fantastic organization, the Rainforest Partnership, that addresses exactly those issues:

    Rainforest Partnership, an international nonprofit organization created in 2007 in Austin, was formed with the idea that the way to protect the lungs of the planet is to help the people who live in those lungs make a living that allows them to protect their forests. People living in and near the forests need sustainable social and economic benefits from not overusing the forests. Using a bottom-up approach, we match economic development choices to the needs and desires, culture, knowledge and skills of local communities, and to the opportunities created by each individual rain forest. It all begins when a community turns to us asking us to help them identify an alternative to cutting down their trees, stemming from their desire to maintain their way of life and their forests.

    Please read more about it here

    Organizations and endeavors such as this one may one day enable us to strike a balance between the needs of the people living on our planet and the needs of our planet, which in fact are mutually supportive.

  • zephyr

    The description of the amount of biodiversity in the Yasuní National Park is almost too much to take in. I have to wonder how much average people can grasp the difference between the richness that is above ground and oil that lies beneath? To me there is no comparison whatsoever.

  • DORIAN DE WIND, Military Affairs Columnist

    Zephyr says:

    I have to wonder how much average people can grasp the difference between the richness that is above ground and oil that lies beneath? To me there is no comparison whatsoever.

    That’s exactly the dilemma, Zephyr. To governments, and people, of very poor countries, the short term benefits of realizing a bonanza in income at the expense of the environment — in this case the priceless and irretrievable biodiversity of that ecosystem — can sometimes be almost impossible to resist.

    That’s when more wealthy and cognizant nations and organizations can and should step in to strike some kind of balance and mitigate such disasters.

    Ecuador’s president is trying to do exactly that with the Yasuní National Park and oil reserves underneath it, but , alas, has only gotten a lukewarm response .