<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Popular Spanish Satirical Magazine&#8217;s           Unique Retraction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/14220/popular-spanish-satirical-magazines-unique-retraction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/14220/popular-spanish-satirical-magazines-unique-retraction/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:41:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynx</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/14220/popular-spanish-satirical-magazines-unique-retraction/comment-page-1/#comment-92283</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/places/europe/14220/popular-spanish-satirical-magazines-unique-retraction/#comment-92283</guid>
		<description>I have the copy of the magazine with me now. I don&#039;t ordinarily buy it, but I thought I&#039;d do it out of curiosity and as a show of support. I do wish they had been more aggressive in their reaction. Other than the cover and a brief editorial, there were no other references to the incident within the magazine. I suppose they did it to avoid further legal trouble. Still, it&#039;s been refreshing to see that the public is overwhelmingly on their side on this issue. Now if we can just get rid of laws against &quot;denigrating the Crown&quot;. It&#039;s SO 19th century...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the copy of the magazine with me now. I don&#8217;t ordinarily buy it, but I thought I&#8217;d do it out of curiosity and as a show of support. I do wish they had been more aggressive in their reaction. Other than the cover and a brief editorial, there were no other references to the incident within the magazine. I suppose they did it to avoid further legal trouble. Still, it&#8217;s been refreshing to see that the public is overwhelmingly on their side on this issue. Now if we can just get rid of laws against &#8220;denigrating the Crown&#8221;. It&#8217;s SO 19th century&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

