<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democrats Are Wooing Religious Voters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/14178/democrats-are-wooing-religious-voters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/14178/democrats-are-wooing-religious-voters/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:16:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Democrats @ 2008 Presidential Election &#187; Democrats Are Wooing Religious Voters</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/14178/democrats-are-wooing-religious-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-104064</link>
		<dc:creator>Democrats @ 2008 Presidential Election &#187; Democrats Are Wooing Religious Voters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/14178/democrats-are-wooing-religious-voters/#comment-104064</guid>
		<description>[...] Joe Gandelman added an interesting post on Democrats Are Wooing Religious VotersHere&#8217;s a small excerpt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Joe Gandelman added an interesting post on Democrats Are Wooing Religious VotersHere&#8217;s a small excerpt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenDreams</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/14178/democrats-are-wooing-religious-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-92018</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenDreams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 23:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/14178/democrats-are-wooing-religious-voters/#comment-92018</guid>
		<description>A big part of the liberal shift among the religious is not about whether Dems are seen as &quot;friendly&quot; or &quot;hostile&quot; to religion. It&#039;s that they have kids and are waking up to the fact that we have a responsibility to care for this &quot;garden&quot;. the &quot;Creation Care&quot; movement (shhhh, don&#039;t say environmental) among Christians claims over 40 million members ! 

There is undoubtedly a disgust factor too, not only with Foley, Vitter, et al, but the images from Abu Ghraib and Gitmo and the general stench of very highly un-Jesus-like behavior among the Republicans. Oh and this:
&lt;blockquote&gt;â€œNational Christian leaders received hugs and smiles in person and then were dismissed behind their backs and described as â€˜ridiculous,â€™ â€˜out of control,â€™ and just plain â€˜goofy,â€™â€ 
David Kuo, special assistant to president Bush from 2001 to 2003&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A big part of the liberal shift among the religious is not about whether Dems are seen as &#8220;friendly&#8221; or &#8220;hostile&#8221; to religion. It&#8217;s that they have kids and are waking up to the fact that we have a responsibility to care for this &#8220;garden&#8221;. the &#8220;Creation Care&#8221; movement (shhhh, don&#8217;t say environmental) among Christians claims over 40 million members ! </p>
<p>There is undoubtedly a disgust factor too, not only with Foley, Vitter, et al, but the images from Abu Ghraib and Gitmo and the general stench of very highly un-Jesus-like behavior among the Republicans. Oh and this:</p>
<blockquote><p>â€œNational Christian leaders received hugs and smiles in person and then were dismissed behind their backs and described as â€˜ridiculous,â€™ â€˜out of control,â€™ and just plain â€˜goofy,â€™â€<br />
David Kuo, special assistant to president Bush from 2001 to 2003</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: domajot</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/14178/democrats-are-wooing-religious-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-91984</link>
		<dc:creator>domajot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 20:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/14178/democrats-are-wooing-religious-voters/#comment-91984</guid>
		<description>Pursuing  religious voters may be a smart more for the Democrats, but, personally I don&#039;t welcome it

Instead, I keep hoping that religion would be put on the back burner, once again.  The spectacle of politicians  compleitng about who is most religious gives both religion and politics a bad name, IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pursuing  religious voters may be a smart more for the Democrats, but, personally I don&#8217;t welcome it</p>
<p>Instead, I keep hoping that religion would be put on the back burner, once again.  The spectacle of politicians  compleitng about who is most religious gives both religion and politics a bad name, IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rambie</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/14178/democrats-are-wooing-religious-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-91974</link>
		<dc:creator>Rambie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/14178/democrats-are-wooing-religious-voters/#comment-91974</guid>
		<description>Ashen, I think your right.  The GOP had a majority if not a monopoly for the past 12 years.  The messed up and now are paying for it.  The GOP will survive and hopefully be reborn in a more moderate form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ashen, I think your right.  The GOP had a majority if not a monopoly for the past 12 years.  The messed up and now are paying for it.  The GOP will survive and hopefully be reborn in a more moderate form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: superdestroyer</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/14178/democrats-are-wooing-religious-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-91946</link>
		<dc:creator>superdestroyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/14178/democrats-are-wooing-religious-voters/#comment-91946</guid>
		<description>Ashen, 

There is not enough based for the Republican to maintain a base.  The most likely scenerio is that the Republicans become irrelevent but manage to hang on  such as the Republican Party in the District of Columbia or Mass.  The Republicans will have no chance of winning but will keep some other party from starting.  

However, with the financial demands of maintain a political party , I do not believe that the Republicans can stick around very long if they are irrelevent.   The theory that a third party can start up that will be relevent has been shown to be untrue at the state level.  Nothing has replaced the irrelevent Republicans in states like Mass, Rhode Island, or Vermont. 

Also, why would another party start when more than 50% of the population will automatically vote for the Democratic candidate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ashen, </p>
<p>There is not enough based for the Republican to maintain a base.  The most likely scenerio is that the Republicans become irrelevent but manage to hang on  such as the Republican Party in the District of Columbia or Mass.  The Republicans will have no chance of winning but will keep some other party from starting.  </p>
<p>However, with the financial demands of maintain a political party , I do not believe that the Republicans can stick around very long if they are irrelevent.   The theory that a third party can start up that will be relevent has been shown to be untrue at the state level.  Nothing has replaced the irrelevent Republicans in states like Mass, Rhode Island, or Vermont. </p>
<p>Also, why would another party start when more than 50% of the population will automatically vote for the Democratic candidate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: University Update - Barack Obama - Democrats Are Wooing Religious Voters</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/14178/democrats-are-wooing-religious-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-91936</link>
		<dc:creator>University Update - Barack Obama - Democrats Are Wooing Religious Voters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/14178/democrats-are-wooing-religious-voters/#comment-91936</guid>
		<description>[...] Clark                       Link to Article                barack obama Democrats Are Wooing Religious Voters &#187;  Posted at The Moderate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Clark                       Link to Article                barack obama Democrats Are Wooing Religious Voters &#187;  Posted at The Moderate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashen Shard</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/14178/democrats-are-wooing-religious-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-91934</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashen Shard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/14178/democrats-are-wooing-religious-voters/#comment-91934</guid>
		<description>superdestroyer,

You should stop worrying about the possibility of a one party state because, historically, when a party collapses in this country another one replaces it.  Sure, for a few years the Dems may have a monopoly, but it will not last.  Only question remaining is whether or not the party that replaces the Republicans  will be more radically conservative or more moderate.  Also, I must point out that as long as the Republicans hold onto their base, they will not collapse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>superdestroyer,</p>
<p>You should stop worrying about the possibility of a one party state because, historically, when a party collapses in this country another one replaces it.  Sure, for a few years the Dems may have a monopoly, but it will not last.  Only question remaining is whether or not the party that replaces the Republicans  will be more radically conservative or more moderate.  Also, I must point out that as long as the Republicans hold onto their base, they will not collapse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: University Update - Hillary Clinton - Democrats Are Wooing Religious Voters</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/14178/democrats-are-wooing-religious-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-91926</link>
		<dc:creator>University Update - Hillary Clinton - Democrats Are Wooing Religious Voters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/14178/democrats-are-wooing-religious-voters/#comment-91926</guid>
		<description>[...] Clark                       Link to Article                hillary clinton Democrats Are Wooing Religious Voters &#187;  Posted at The Moderate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Clark                       Link to Article                hillary clinton Democrats Are Wooing Religious Voters &#187;  Posted at The Moderate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: superdestroyer</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/14178/democrats-are-wooing-religious-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-91920</link>
		<dc:creator>superdestroyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/14178/democrats-are-wooing-religious-voters/#comment-91920</guid>
		<description>Two points. 

1.  Democrats only do poorly with religious whites.  Since blacks and Hispanics are, on average, more religious than whites, the Democrats go great with religious non-whites. 

2.  I would propose that that best way to separate religious whites from the Republican Party would be to keep playing up sex scandals involving Republicans ala Rep. Foley. 

Of course, in a few years, when the republican party totally collapse, religious whites will either vote in the Democratic Primary or have no say in politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two points. </p>
<p>1.  Democrats only do poorly with religious whites.  Since blacks and Hispanics are, on average, more religious than whites, the Democrats go great with religious non-whites. </p>
<p>2.  I would propose that that best way to separate religious whites from the Republican Party would be to keep playing up sex scandals involving Republicans ala Rep. Foley. </p>
<p>Of course, in a few years, when the republican party totally collapse, religious whites will either vote in the Democratic Primary or have no say in politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
