<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guest Voice: Let&#8217;s Go Private</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/14092/guest-voice-lets-go-private/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/14092/guest-voice-lets-go-private/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:38:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Satterfield</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/14092/guest-voice-lets-go-private/comment-page-1/#comment-91338</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Satterfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 02:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/14092/guest-voice-lets-go-private/#comment-91338</guid>
		<description>Businesses, especially publicly held corporations, are about profit. Nothing more and nothing less. When publicly held in modern America the opinions of Wall Street analysts come ahead of customers. Look at what&#039;s happening to Dell. Crappy customer service from people working for outsourcing firms that are having such major staffing problems that many of their hires don&#039;t have the mastery of English they are supposed to possess is de rigeur. A &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.zdnet.com/virtualization/?p=174&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ZDNet blogger&lt;/a&gt; recently wrote of what he went through with them in spite of having a next business day on site warranty that he paid extra for. The link is to the first entry on his &quot;adventure&quot;. The most recent entry is Day 14. They actually led him through disassembling a major portion of his laptop before agreeing to send a new part and a tech to install it. This is not that unusual for what passes for customer service in the modern corporation. There are the many examples of health insurance companies disallowing treatments and prescriptions so they don&#039;t have to pay out money as well as their habit of taking many months to pay doctors, hospitals and labs. Then there is the rigging of the energy markets that traders took part in that caused many people to pay far too much for electricity in California.

Enron, Andersen (Enron&#039;s auditors), Tyco, Adelphia, Global Crossing and how many others have shown that the profit motive can go mad. Why would we really want to entrust government services to that system? I don&#039;t see proposals from most of those pushing the concept of privatization to reign the private companies and those who run them in &lt;strong&gt;hard&lt;/strong&gt; if caught in abuses. Only with extremely strong systems in place to ensure transparency and crushing penalties should they be caught should it even be a possibility to privatize most government services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Businesses, especially publicly held corporations, are about profit. Nothing more and nothing less. When publicly held in modern America the opinions of Wall Street analysts come ahead of customers. Look at what&#8217;s happening to Dell. Crappy customer service from people working for outsourcing firms that are having such major staffing problems that many of their hires don&#8217;t have the mastery of English they are supposed to possess is de rigeur. A <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/virtualization/?p=174" rel="nofollow">ZDNet blogger</a> recently wrote of what he went through with them in spite of having a next business day on site warranty that he paid extra for. The link is to the first entry on his &#8220;adventure&#8221;. The most recent entry is Day 14. They actually led him through disassembling a major portion of his laptop before agreeing to send a new part and a tech to install it. This is not that unusual for what passes for customer service in the modern corporation. There are the many examples of health insurance companies disallowing treatments and prescriptions so they don&#8217;t have to pay out money as well as their habit of taking many months to pay doctors, hospitals and labs. Then there is the rigging of the energy markets that traders took part in that caused many people to pay far too much for electricity in California.</p>
<p>Enron, Andersen (Enron&#8217;s auditors), Tyco, Adelphia, Global Crossing and how many others have shown that the profit motive can go mad. Why would we really want to entrust government services to that system? I don&#8217;t see proposals from most of those pushing the concept of privatization to reign the private companies and those who run them in <strong>hard</strong> if caught in abuses. Only with extremely strong systems in place to ensure transparency and crushing penalties should they be caught should it even be a possibility to privatize most government services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynx</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/14092/guest-voice-lets-go-private/comment-page-1/#comment-91191</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/14092/guest-voice-lets-go-private/#comment-91191</guid>
		<description>Many great things in society can be changed by a willing and dedicated populace, but the requirement is rather high. To me, the argument &quot;we don&#039;t need government, if everyone just pitched in we could do it ourselves&quot; sounds as pretty (and as impractical) as &quot;everyone should share with one another, no one should have very much more than anyone else&quot;. The first is considered convervatism, the second communism, but neither work entirely because they both depend too much on trusting everyone to play fair.

The key is striking a balance between the two. It&#039;s much easier in very small communities. The northern spanish village where my mothers cousin lives, the lifstyle is very conservative but at the same time they unconsiously function as a commune. She has cows, so she milks them and has an excess of milk. So she goes around to neighbors and gives them milk, and they in return give her meat, fruit etc. All excess is sold at the market for other goods. They don&#039;t really think about it, it&#039;s just &quot;always been that way&quot;. The way we depend on one another gets much muddier as populations grow larger, which is when government steps in.

The ideal is a government large enough to provide the very basics in case of need, but not so large that it prevents you from getting, if you have the inclination and means, better goods and services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many great things in society can be changed by a willing and dedicated populace, but the requirement is rather high. To me, the argument &#8220;we don&#8217;t need government, if everyone just pitched in we could do it ourselves&#8221; sounds as pretty (and as impractical) as &#8220;everyone should share with one another, no one should have very much more than anyone else&#8221;. The first is considered convervatism, the second communism, but neither work entirely because they both depend too much on trusting everyone to play fair.</p>
<p>The key is striking a balance between the two. It&#8217;s much easier in very small communities. The northern spanish village where my mothers cousin lives, the lifstyle is very conservative but at the same time they unconsiously function as a commune. She has cows, so she milks them and has an excess of milk. So she goes around to neighbors and gives them milk, and they in return give her meat, fruit etc. All excess is sold at the market for other goods. They don&#8217;t really think about it, it&#8217;s just &#8220;always been that way&#8221;. The way we depend on one another gets much muddier as populations grow larger, which is when government steps in.</p>
<p>The ideal is a government large enough to provide the very basics in case of need, but not so large that it prevents you from getting, if you have the inclination and means, better goods and services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
