<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Capitol Hill Blue Retracts Controversial Negative Ron Paul Piece</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:41:46 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Capitol Hill Blue Retracts Controversial Negative Ron Paul Piece &#171; Us Elections</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-100360</link>
		<dc:creator>Capitol Hill Blue Retracts Controversial Negative Ron Paul Piece &#171; Us Elections</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 09:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/blogging/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/#comment-100360</guid>
		<description>[...] read more &#124; digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more | digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mickrussom</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-98637</link>
		<dc:creator>mickrussom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 02:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/blogging/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/#comment-98637</guid>
		<description>I say this with all seriousness. The country will probably disintegrate and be carved up the Chinese if Ron Paul does not win. It will take time, but we are on the road to perdition.

America needs Ron Paul more than ever, and everyone who supports Ron Paul loves him as he is the closest thing to family we have ever seen in government.

Ron Paul, for what is just, what is right, and what is our Nation&#039;s root modus, the Constitution and Freedom and Liberty for All.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say this with all seriousness. The country will probably disintegrate and be carved up the Chinese if Ron Paul does not win. It will take time, but we are on the road to perdition.</p>
<p>America needs Ron Paul more than ever, and everyone who supports Ron Paul loves him as he is the closest thing to family we have ever seen in government.</p>
<p>Ron Paul, for what is just, what is right, and what is our Nation&#8217;s root modus, the Constitution and Freedom and Liberty for All.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Paul Snippets from Lew Rockwell&#8217;s Blog &#171; Ron Paul for United States President 2008</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-90092</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Paul Snippets from Lew Rockwell&#8217;s Blog &#171; Ron Paul for United States President 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/blogging/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/#comment-90092</guid>
		<description>[...] UPDATE: A good post by Joe Gandelman of The Moderate Voice on the Capitol Hill Blue retraction: Capitol Hill Blue Retracts Controversial Negative Ron Paul Piece [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UPDATE: A good post by Joe Gandelman of The Moderate Voice on the Capitol Hill Blue retraction: Capitol Hill Blue Retracts Controversial Negative Ron Paul Piece [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cartoons Plugin &#187; Blog Archive &#187; xmen lesbians Capitol Hill Blue Retracts Controversial Negative Ron Paul Piece</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-89894</link>
		<dc:creator>Cartoons Plugin &#187; Blog Archive &#187; xmen lesbians Capitol Hill Blue Retracts Controversial Negative Ron Paul Piece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 16:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/blogging/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/#comment-89894</guid>
		<description>[...] lesbians Editor sent on semi-permanent vacation&#8230; xmen kittyread more &#124; digg [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lesbians Editor sent on semi-permanent vacation&#8230; xmen kittyread more | digg [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prime News Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; wonder woman toon porn Capitol Hill Blue Retracts Controversial Negative Ron Paul Piece</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-89865</link>
		<dc:creator>Prime News Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; wonder woman toon porn Capitol Hill Blue Retracts Controversial Negative Ron Paul Piece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 13:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/blogging/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/#comment-89865</guid>
		<description>[...] woman toon porn Editor sent on semi-permanent vacation&#8230; wonder women bondageread more &#124; digg [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] woman toon porn Editor sent on semi-permanent vacation&#8230; wonder women bondageread more | digg [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mw</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-89844</link>
		<dc:creator>mw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 04:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/blogging/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/#comment-89844</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;I used to be a fan of the Rant, but this â€œscrubbingâ€ smells more than the latest episode of DT soap opera.&quot; - rudi&lt;/i&gt;
Yeah. That is exactly my point.  DT&#039;s writing is compelling, &lt;b&gt;but&lt;/b&gt; - articles appear, disappear, get revised and reappear regularly.  His invokes &quot;sources&quot; for years like   &quot;George Harleigh&quot; and  &quot;Terry Wilkinson&quot;, and then suddenly claims he was duped by the sources and erases and/or modifies old &quot;investigative&quot; stories that reference them.  Then there are his co-workers at CHB: William McTavish, Sandra Riley and Teresa Hampton, who have been firing each other, working for each other, buying and selling CHB to one another for years, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.classicalvalues.com/archives/003884.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;none of whom appear to actually exist outside of the cyber &quot;second-life&quot; world of CHB&lt;/a&gt;.  It is all so freaking weird that you almost have to just sit back and admire it.  It has got to be joke or an experiment , to see how far they can push this nonsense and still have people take them seriously. Apparently you really can fool some of the people all of the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;I used to be a fan of the Rant, but this â€œscrubbingâ€ smells more than the latest episode of DT soap opera.&#8221; &#8211; rudi</i><br />
Yeah. That is exactly my point.  DT&#8217;s writing is compelling, <b>but</b> &#8211; articles appear, disappear, get revised and reappear regularly.  His invokes &#8220;sources&#8221; for years like   &#8220;George Harleigh&#8221; and  &#8220;Terry Wilkinson&#8221;, and then suddenly claims he was duped by the sources and erases and/or modifies old &#8220;investigative&#8221; stories that reference them.  Then there are his co-workers at CHB: William McTavish, Sandra Riley and Teresa Hampton, who have been firing each other, working for each other, buying and selling CHB to one another for years, <a href="http://www.classicalvalues.com/archives/003884.html" rel="nofollow">none of whom appear to actually exist outside of the cyber &#8220;second-life&#8221; world of CHB</a>.  It is all so freaking weird that you almost have to just sit back and admire it.  It has got to be joke or an experiment , to see how far they can push this nonsense and still have people take them seriously. Apparently you really can fool some of the people all of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat McG</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-89837</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat McG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 03:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/blogging/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/#comment-89837</guid>
		<description>Also, own up to it if you screw up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, own up to it if you screw up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat McG</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-89836</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat McG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 03:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/blogging/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/#comment-89836</guid>
		<description>Following this whole thread has been informative. I think the lesson to take away is: be sure your source is credible before quoting or linking to them. Not just generally, but on the specific topic of the moment. Basic journalism, whether you do news, opinion or both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following this whole thread has been informative. I think the lesson to take away is: be sure your source is credible before quoting or linking to them. Not just generally, but on the specific topic of the moment. Basic journalism, whether you do news, opinion or both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cartoons Fans Lounge</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-89829</link>
		<dc:creator>Cartoons Fans Lounge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 01:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/blogging/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/#comment-89829</guid>
		<description>[...] Men kitty Editor sent on semi-permanent vacation&#8230; X Men nakedread more &#124; digg story     RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI           Cartoons Fans Lounge [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Men kitty Editor sent on semi-permanent vacation&#8230; X Men nakedread more | digg story     RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI           Cartoons Fans Lounge [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudi</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-89825</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 20:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/blogging/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/#comment-89825</guid>
		<description>I went over to CHB and the Rants archive, a funny thing is missing - Thompson&#039;s farwell column from February 2006 isn&#039;t in the archive. There is an &quot;18 minute&quot; gap &quot;ala&quot; Tricky Dick Nixon. As I stated above, I used to be a fan of the Rant, but this &quot;scrubbing&quot; smells more tahn the latest episode of DT soap opera.
 October 30, 2006 - 8:52am.
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cont/node/2205

 February 10, 2006 - 2:56pm.
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cont/node/32
Doug must have channeled Rose Mary Woods - LOL,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went over to CHB and the Rants archive, a funny thing is missing &#8211; Thompson&#8217;s farwell column from February 2006 isn&#8217;t in the archive. There is an &#8220;18 minute&#8221; gap &#8220;ala&#8221; Tricky Dick Nixon. As I stated above, I used to be a fan of the Rant, but this &#8220;scrubbing&#8221; smells more tahn the latest episode of DT soap opera.<br />
 October 30, 2006 &#8211; 8:52am.<br />
<a href="http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cont/node/2205" rel="nofollow">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cont/node/2205</a></p>
<p> February 10, 2006 &#8211; 2:56pm.<br />
<a href="http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cont/node/32" rel="nofollow">http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cont/node/32</a><br />
Doug must have channeled Rose Mary Woods &#8211; LOL,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudi</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-89822</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 20:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/blogging/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/#comment-89822</guid>
		<description>I used to be a regular read of CHB and followed Thompson. He has a history of being a &quot;Yellow journalist&quot;, but is an interesting read. Prior to W&#039;s administration, he was DEEPLY critical of the Clinton administration. He is an iconoclast and muck racker. A year and a half ago he left the CHB, which he founded. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;THOMPSON LEAVES CAPITOL HILL BLUE
Monday, February 06, 2006 - FreeMarketNews.com

Capitol Hill Blue announced Saturday that its founder, Doug Thompson, has decided to leave the Internet site, where he covered politics among other things, in favor of local journalism. According to the website&#039;s own account, the site and its management will now be in the hands of &quot;a consortium of Washington-based journalists who will publish Capitol Hill Blue in addition to their regular jobs with mainstream print publications and broadcast media.&quot;
http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=6960
It named Theresa Hampton, who has twice served as editor in the past, as the new editor/publisher. Thompson, himself, wrote a farewell, although he did leave room for a possible return to writing about politics in the future. In his apparently final &quot;rant,&quot; he noted the need for &quot;a break&quot; noting that &quot;I&#039;m tired and this tilting at windmills business is exhausting.&quot; &lt;/blockquote&gt; 
My impression at the time was that this wasn&#039;t entirety a voluntary move. At that time I drifted away from the CHB, I didn&#039;t even know that DT returned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to be a regular read of CHB and followed Thompson. He has a history of being a &#8220;Yellow journalist&#8221;, but is an interesting read. Prior to W&#8217;s administration, he was DEEPLY critical of the Clinton administration. He is an iconoclast and muck racker. A year and a half ago he left the CHB, which he founded. </p>
<blockquote><p>THOMPSON LEAVES CAPITOL HILL BLUE<br />
Monday, February 06, 2006 &#8211; FreeMarketNews.com</p>
<p>Capitol Hill Blue announced Saturday that its founder, Doug Thompson, has decided to leave the Internet site, where he covered politics among other things, in favor of local journalism. According to the website&#8217;s own account, the site and its management will now be in the hands of &#8220;a consortium of Washington-based journalists who will publish Capitol Hill Blue in addition to their regular jobs with mainstream print publications and broadcast media.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=6960" rel="nofollow">http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=6960</a><br />
It named Theresa Hampton, who has twice served as editor in the past, as the new editor/publisher. Thompson, himself, wrote a farewell, although he did leave room for a possible return to writing about politics in the future. In his apparently final &#8220;rant,&#8221; he noted the need for &#8220;a break&#8221; noting that &#8220;I&#8217;m tired and this tilting at windmills business is exhausting.&#8221; </p></blockquote>
<p>My impression at the time was that this wasn&#8217;t entirety a voluntary move. At that time I drifted away from the CHB, I didn&#8217;t even know that DT returned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mw</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-89798</link>
		<dc:creator>mw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 16:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/blogging/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/#comment-89798</guid>
		<description>Look Joe. I was not/did not say you should &quot;DARE&quot; not use CHB.  I said that if you use them, you risk being tainted by them. That&#039;s it. 

I got burned a year ago and I&#039;m still pissed about it.  So... like you say, thats my &lt;em&gt;&quot;blog-like gut reaction.&quot;&lt;/em&gt; I am a small time blogger and don&#039;t claim to be anything else.  If DT and CHB were just another popular blog like Kos or Malkin, fine.  But they claim to be something else, they claim to hold themselves to a higher journalistic standard and they fail spectacularly  by the standards they claim for themselves.  That makes them different (another &lt;i&gt;&quot;blog-like gut reaction&quot;&lt;/i&gt; on my part).  In fact, it is so odd, so weird, and so blatant that I have wondered whether the whole site is some sort of elaborate practical joke, or  maybe some kind of social experiment conducted  by academics that will be revealed in a  PHD dissertation some day.  Thompson is a really good writer though. That is what makes the site seductive and quoteable. Anyway, I just think that anytime that site is referenced, readers should be made aware of its questionable history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look Joe. I was not/did not say you should &#8220;DARE&#8221; not use CHB.  I said that if you use them, you risk being tainted by them. That&#8217;s it. </p>
<p>I got burned a year ago and I&#8217;m still pissed about it.  So&#8230; like you say, thats my <em>&#8220;blog-like gut reaction.&#8221;</em> I am a small time blogger and don&#8217;t claim to be anything else.  If DT and CHB were just another popular blog like Kos or Malkin, fine.  But they claim to be something else, they claim to hold themselves to a higher journalistic standard and they fail spectacularly  by the standards they claim for themselves.  That makes them different (another <i>&#8220;blog-like gut reaction&#8221;</i> on my part).  In fact, it is so odd, so weird, and so blatant that I have wondered whether the whole site is some sort of elaborate practical joke, or  maybe some kind of social experiment conducted  by academics that will be revealed in a  PHD dissertation some day.  Thompson is a really good writer though. That is what makes the site seductive and quoteable. Anyway, I just think that anytime that site is referenced, readers should be made aware of its questionable history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Gandelman</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-89785</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Gandelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 15:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/blogging/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/#comment-89785</guid>
		<description>We have people all the time email us that if we DARE quote  Daily Kos or DARE quote  Michelle Malkin we are tainted and they will never visit us again. We hate to lose readers but we haven&#039;t selected new editors. If we see a compelling quote in a story or post we quote from it. If we listened to people and relied on the links they sent me from various sites saying how bad x and y and z sites and writers are and how because we dare quote from them and link to them  we have no credibility we would have few sites to quote who expressed opinions or took positions. Except from the ones they agree with. We quote and link from a lot of sources and if we see something compelling, we will continue to do so. Also: every newspaper has made mistakes including huge ones and run corrections. Most blogs and internet news websites don&#039;t  usually run corrections but in this case CHB did. YES I remember well the story linked above as well. But that doesn&#039;t mean I don&#039;t revisit that or any site if they&#039;re writing on a topic and take a stand that reflects a differing viewpoint that readers might want to see so they realize not everyone feels the same way about a given candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have people all the time email us that if we DARE quote  Daily Kos or DARE quote  Michelle Malkin we are tainted and they will never visit us again. We hate to lose readers but we haven&#8217;t selected new editors. If we see a compelling quote in a story or post we quote from it. If we listened to people and relied on the links they sent me from various sites saying how bad x and y and z sites and writers are and how because we dare quote from them and link to them  we have no credibility we would have few sites to quote who expressed opinions or took positions. Except from the ones they agree with. We quote and link from a lot of sources and if we see something compelling, we will continue to do so. Also: every newspaper has made mistakes including huge ones and run corrections. Most blogs and internet news websites don&#8217;t  usually run corrections but in this case CHB did. YES I remember well the story linked above as well. But that doesn&#8217;t mean I don&#8217;t revisit that or any site if they&#8217;re writing on a topic and take a stand that reflects a differing viewpoint that readers might want to see so they realize not everyone feels the same way about a given candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mw</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-89774</link>
		<dc:creator>mw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 14:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/blogging/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/#comment-89774</guid>
		<description>Doug Thompson and CHB have zero credibility and any blogger that ever quotes anything they say, whether a story or even a subsequent retraction risks being tainted by the association. This particular story is not unique. Thompson frequently apologizes for , corrects, or simply disappears stories he presents at CHB as facts, usually blaming co-workers or untraceable sources.  Eric at Classical Values did &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.classicalvalues.com/archives/003880.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a great series on Doug Thompson and CHB&lt;/a&gt; a year ago, concluding:    &lt;blockquote&gt; &quot;I&#039;m getting a bit tired of Capitol Hill Blue. It&#039;s an unreliable web site which I&#039;d never read before July 16, and I think it&#039;s staffed by sock puppets... is it possible that reasonable people might be able to agree that regardless of who or what it is, or how, or why it originated, Capitol Hill Blue has been so thoroughly discredited, that it should not be relied on by anyone, anywhere, ever again?&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.classicalvalues.com/archives/003885.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;great read&lt;/a&gt;. 

I am speaking from experience, as &lt;a href=&quot;http://westanddivided.blogspot.com/2006/06/piece-of-paper.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I quoted DT &lt;/a&gt;in a post where he claims that GWB said the Constitution was &lt;em&gt;&quot;A god damn piece of paper&quot;&lt;/em&gt; in a meeting. CHB has subsequently retracted, &quot;disappeared&quot;, and restored that story on their site. I corrected my piece but left it out there with the correction and links to Eric&#039;s story as a cautionary tale for other bloggers. 

CHB is a very odd duck, made worse by their claims to be a journalistic site and  a higher standard than a blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug Thompson and CHB have zero credibility and any blogger that ever quotes anything they say, whether a story or even a subsequent retraction risks being tainted by the association. This particular story is not unique. Thompson frequently apologizes for , corrects, or simply disappears stories he presents at CHB as facts, usually blaming co-workers or untraceable sources.  Eric at Classical Values did <a href="http://www.classicalvalues.com/archives/003880.html" rel="nofollow">a great series on Doug Thompson and CHB</a> a year ago, concluding:<br />
<blockquote> &#8220;I&#8217;m getting a bit tired of Capitol Hill Blue. It&#8217;s an unreliable web site which I&#8217;d never read before July 16, and I think it&#8217;s staffed by sock puppets&#8230; is it possible that reasonable people might be able to agree that regardless of who or what it is, or how, or why it originated, Capitol Hill Blue has been so thoroughly discredited, that it should not be relied on by anyone, anywhere, ever again?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>It is a <a href="http://www.classicalvalues.com/archives/003885.html" rel="nofollow">great read</a>. </p>
<p>I am speaking from experience, as <a href="http://westanddivided.blogspot.com/2006/06/piece-of-paper.html" rel="nofollow">I quoted DT </a>in a post where he claims that GWB said the Constitution was <em>&#8220;A god damn piece of paper&#8221;</em> in a meeting. CHB has subsequently retracted, &#8220;disappeared&#8221;, and restored that story on their site. I corrected my piece but left it out there with the correction and links to Eric&#8217;s story as a cautionary tale for other bloggers. </p>
<p>CHB is a very odd duck, made worse by their claims to be a journalistic site and  a higher standard than a blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Liberty</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-89767</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Liberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 11:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/blogging/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/#comment-89767</guid>
		<description>Ron Paul is the only Republican candidate I would even consider voting for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Paul is the only Republican candidate I would even consider voting for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: University Update - Ron Paul - Capitol Hill Blue Retracts Controversial Negative Ron Paul Piece</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-89752</link>
		<dc:creator>University Update - Ron Paul - Capitol Hill Blue Retracts Controversial Negative Ron Paul Piece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 02:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/blogging/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/#comment-89752</guid>
		<description>[...] Clark                       Link to Article                ron paul Capitol Hill Blue Retracts Controversial Negative Ron Paul Piece &#187;  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Clark                       Link to Article                ron paul Capitol Hill Blue Retracts Controversial Negative Ron Paul Piece &#187;  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashen Shard</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-89750</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashen Shard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 02:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/blogging/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/#comment-89750</guid>
		<description>Mike P.,

I actually saw a John Birch Society bumper sticker the other day.  Shouldn&#039;t have been surprised considering where I live, didn&#039;t think it was an organization that had much following or power anymore though.  Maybe they are making a come back?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike P.,</p>
<p>I actually saw a John Birch Society bumper sticker the other day.  Shouldn&#8217;t have been surprised considering where I live, didn&#8217;t think it was an organization that had much following or power anymore though.  Maybe they are making a come back?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike P.</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-89749</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 02:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/blogging/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/#comment-89749</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised it wasn&#039;t having called him a &quot;John Bircher&quot; that got the editor in trouble.  That at least was a new accusation! But maybe people just don&#039;t remember them as much these days.

Anyway, you do nail the &quot;moral of the story,&quot; and I&#039;m sure many of the commenters here (certainly me) as well as some of the bloggers have paid a price for hitting send before fully engaging brain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised it wasn&#8217;t having called him a &#8220;John Bircher&#8221; that got the editor in trouble.  That at least was a new accusation! But maybe people just don&#8217;t remember them as much these days.</p>
<p>Anyway, you do nail the &#8220;moral of the story,&#8221; and I&#8217;m sure many of the commenters here (certainly me) as well as some of the bloggers have paid a price for hitting send before fully engaging brain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat McG</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-89746</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat McG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 01:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/blogging/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/#comment-89746</guid>
		<description>Great post. I was curious how all of this came about the last few days. I often find myself restraining myself on posts on my own site and I can&#039;t bring myself to link to others who are irresponsible. Even if they do have some valid points it takes something away from me by having &#039;endorsed&#039; the entire post by linking to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. I was curious how all of this came about the last few days. I often find myself restraining myself on posts on my own site and I can&#8217;t bring myself to link to others who are irresponsible. Even if they do have some valid points it takes something away from me by having &#8216;endorsed&#8217; the entire post by linking to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Paul Says He Has More Cash On Hand Than McCain Does (UPDATED) &#187; The Moderate Voice</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-89741</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Paul Says He Has More Cash On Hand Than McCain Does (UPDATED) &#187; The Moderate Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 00:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/blogging/13927/capital-hill-blue-retracts-controversial-negative-ron-paul-piece/#comment-89741</guid>
		<description>[...] UPDATE: 7/7/07 Capital Hill Blue has retracted that post and some others. READ OUR UPDATE. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UPDATE: 7/7/07 Capital Hill Blue has retracted that post and some others. READ OUR UPDATE. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
