<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White House Backs Cheney: Defends Veep On Secrets Exemption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:22:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Democrats Will Try To Cut Cheney Out Of Executive Funding &#183; New York Articles</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/comment-page-1/#comment-88382</link>
		<dc:creator>Democrats Will Try To Cut Cheney Out Of Executive Funding &#183; New York Articles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 04:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/law-legal-matters/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/#comment-88382</guid>
		<description>[...] See our earlier post HERE. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See our earlier post HERE. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Democrats Will Try To Cut Cheney Out Of Executive Funding (UPDATED) &#183; Articles</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/comment-page-1/#comment-87915</link>
		<dc:creator>Democrats Will Try To Cut Cheney Out Of Executive Funding (UPDATED) &#183; Articles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 14:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/law-legal-matters/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/#comment-87915</guid>
		<description>[...] See our earlier post HERE. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See our earlier post HERE. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Democrats Will Try To Cut Cheney Out Of Executive Funding &#183; Articles</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/comment-page-1/#comment-87900</link>
		<dc:creator>Democrats Will Try To Cut Cheney Out Of Executive Funding &#183; Articles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/law-legal-matters/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/#comment-87900</guid>
		<description>[...] See our earlier post HERE. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See our earlier post HERE. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inside the USA &#187; Nom de code Angler</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/comment-page-1/#comment-87287</link>
		<dc:creator>Inside the USA &#187; Nom de code Angler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 22:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/law-legal-matters/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/#comment-87287</guid>
		<description>[...] de sécurité nationale, il prétend tout simplement que sa fonction ne fait pas partie de la branche exécutive. Il n&#8217;est donc tout simplement pas soumis à répondre à de telles directives, pourtant [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] de sécurité nationale, il prétend tout simplement que sa fonction ne fait pas partie de la branche exécutive. Il n&#8217;est donc tout simplement pas soumis à répondre à de telles directives, pourtant [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheney, Cheney &#124; VirusHead</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/comment-page-1/#comment-87219</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheney, Cheney &#124; VirusHead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 16:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/law-legal-matters/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/#comment-87219</guid>
		<description>[...]  White House Backs Cheney: Defends Veep On Secrets Exemption [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  White House Backs Cheney: Defends Veep On Secrets Exemption [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Center of Attention &#187; The Moderate Voice</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/comment-page-1/#comment-87216</link>
		<dc:creator>Center of Attention &#187; The Moderate Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 15:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/law-legal-matters/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/#comment-87216</guid>
		<description>[...] Booker Rising features a quote of the day from TMV&#8217;s Jason Steck (writing at Militant Moderates), while Andrew Sullivan (under the title &#8220;Who Are The Lemmings?&#8221;) links to TMV founder Joe Gandelman&#8217;s post on Cheney and the GOP. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Booker Rising features a quote of the day from TMV&#8217;s Jason Steck (writing at Militant Moderates), while Andrew Sullivan (under the title &#8220;Who Are The Lemmings?&#8221;) links to TMV founder Joe Gandelman&#8217;s post on Cheney and the GOP. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Cheney: Surrogate Or The Lone Ranger? &#187; The Moderate Voice</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/comment-page-1/#comment-87190</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick Cheney: Surrogate Or The Lone Ranger? &#187; The Moderate Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 05:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/law-legal-matters/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/#comment-87190</guid>
		<description>[...] See our earlier posts on Cheney here and here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See our earlier posts on Cheney here and here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Democrats Will Try To Cut Cheney Out Of Executive Funding (UPDATED) &#183; Kokorec</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/comment-page-1/#comment-87174</link>
		<dc:creator>Democrats Will Try To Cut Cheney Out Of Executive Funding (UPDATED) &#183; Kokorec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 23:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/law-legal-matters/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/#comment-87174</guid>
		<description>[...] See our earlier post HERE. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See our earlier post HERE. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Democrats Will Try To Cut Cheney Out Of Executive Funding (UPDATED) &#183; New York Articles</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/comment-page-1/#comment-87172</link>
		<dc:creator>Democrats Will Try To Cut Cheney Out Of Executive Funding (UPDATED) &#183; New York Articles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 23:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/law-legal-matters/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/#comment-87172</guid>
		<description>[...] See our earlier post HERE. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See our earlier post HERE. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Democrats Will Try To Cut Cheney Out Of Executive Funding &#183; Kokorec</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/comment-page-1/#comment-87151</link>
		<dc:creator>Democrats Will Try To Cut Cheney Out Of Executive Funding &#183; Kokorec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 20:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/law-legal-matters/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/#comment-87151</guid>
		<description>[...] See our earlier post HERE. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See our earlier post HERE. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Democrats Will Try To Cut Cheney Out Of Executive Funding &#187; The Moderate Voice</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/comment-page-1/#comment-87145</link>
		<dc:creator>Democrats Will Try To Cut Cheney Out Of Executive Funding &#187; The Moderate Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 19:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/law-legal-matters/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/#comment-87145</guid>
		<description>[...] See our earlier post HERE. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See our earlier post HERE. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Divded We Stand United We Fall</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/comment-page-1/#comment-87130</link>
		<dc:creator>Divded We Stand United We Fall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 18:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/law-legal-matters/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/#comment-87130</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Political blogger switches party affiliation and restores the  GOP to pre-Bloomberg defection levels.&lt;/strong&gt;

The GOP can ill afford any defections. They have enough problems with this Republican President hell bent on alienating every single voter in the country and this Republican Vice-President working to sever all legal ties to the government and the const...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Political blogger switches party affiliation and restores the  GOP to pre-Bloomberg defection levels.</strong></p>
<p>The GOP can ill afford any defections. They have enough problems with this Republican President hell bent on alienating every single voter in the country and this Republican Vice-President working to sever all legal ties to the government and the const&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VeronicasLore.com &#187; Bush claims he and Cheney above the law</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/comment-page-1/#comment-87120</link>
		<dc:creator>VeronicasLore.com &#187; Bush claims he and Cheney above the law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 17:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/law-legal-matters/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/#comment-87120</guid>
		<description>[...] Themoderatevoice.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Themoderatevoice.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: domajot</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/comment-page-1/#comment-87101</link>
		<dc:creator>domajot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 16:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/law-legal-matters/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/#comment-87101</guid>
		<description>What strikes me as the most important part of the story is that the WH backs him.

Ultimately, the responsibility for the crumbling of what was once a legitimate government rests with Bush (and those who suuport him)   Criticize Cheney and Gonzalez all you want, but the puppet master pulls the strings.

I never thought I would entertain the idea of impeachment.  Now, I fail to see any other way out of this mess.  
Instead of anti-war marches, I would love to see a massive &#039;throw the bums out&#039; demonstration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What strikes me as the most important part of the story is that the WH backs him.</p>
<p>Ultimately, the responsibility for the crumbling of what was once a legitimate government rests with Bush (and those who suuport him)   Criticize Cheney and Gonzalez all you want, but the puppet master pulls the strings.</p>
<p>I never thought I would entertain the idea of impeachment.  Now, I fail to see any other way out of this mess.<br />
Instead of anti-war marches, I would love to see a massive &#8216;throw the bums out&#8217; demonstration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Cheney: A Branch to Himself &#171; Michael P.F. van der GaliÃ«n</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/comment-page-1/#comment-87066</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick Cheney: A Branch to Himself &#171; Michael P.F. van der GaliÃ«n</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 10:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/law-legal-matters/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/#comment-87066</guid>
		<description>[...] Gandelman writes: This latest controversy is one more manifestation of an executive branch (or, more accurately, now [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gandelman writes: This latest controversy is one more manifestation of an executive branch (or, more accurately, now [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Around The Sphere June 23, 2007 &#183; New York Articles</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/comment-page-1/#comment-87063</link>
		<dc:creator>Around The Sphere June 23, 2007 &#183; New York Articles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 09:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/law-legal-matters/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/#comment-87063</guid>
		<description>[...] On That Branch Of Government Known As Dick Cheney: We did our post below on the news that Vice President Dick Cheney has in effect declared himself a separate branch of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On That Branch Of Government Known As Dick Cheney: We did our post below on the news that Vice President Dick Cheney has in effect declared himself a separate branch of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Around The Sphere June 23, 2007 &#183; Articles</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/comment-page-1/#comment-87060</link>
		<dc:creator>Around The Sphere June 23, 2007 &#183; Articles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 08:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/law-legal-matters/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/#comment-87060</guid>
		<description>[...] On That Branch Of Government Known As Dick Cheney: We did our post below on the news that Vice President Dick Cheney has in effect declared himself a separate branch of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On That Branch Of Government Known As Dick Cheney: We did our post below on the news that Vice President Dick Cheney has in effect declared himself a separate branch of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Around The Sphere June 23, 2007 &#187; The Moderate Voice</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/comment-page-1/#comment-87057</link>
		<dc:creator>Around The Sphere June 23, 2007 &#187; The Moderate Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 07:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/law-legal-matters/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/#comment-87057</guid>
		<description>[...] On That Branch Of Government Known As Dick Cheney: We did our post below on the news that Vice President Dick Cheney has in effect declared himself a separate branch of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On That Branch Of Government Known As Dick Cheney: We did our post below on the news that Vice President Dick Cheney has in effect declared himself a separate branch of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pacatrue</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/comment-page-1/#comment-87056</link>
		<dc:creator>pacatrue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 07:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/law-legal-matters/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/#comment-87056</guid>
		<description>Has the Veep yet tried to explain not just why he doesn&#039;t have to follow the executive order but also precisely why he doesn&#039;t want to? I mean, we can all guess why he doesn&#039;t want to, but I&#039;d love to hear him spell out for us why the Executive Order from the President is a bad one.

This is one of those things where you can kind of see how an argument could be formed for this position, but if you accept it then amazingly bizarre things must follow. Essentially, there are no rules concerning VP conduct, I guess. If he happens to be following some other executive orders now, it&#039;s just a happy coincidence or kind favor to the Prez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has the Veep yet tried to explain not just why he doesn&#8217;t have to follow the executive order but also precisely why he doesn&#8217;t want to? I mean, we can all guess why he doesn&#8217;t want to, but I&#8217;d love to hear him spell out for us why the Executive Order from the President is a bad one.</p>
<p>This is one of those things where you can kind of see how an argument could be formed for this position, but if you accept it then amazingly bizarre things must follow. Essentially, there are no rules concerning VP conduct, I guess. If he happens to be following some other executive orders now, it&#8217;s just a happy coincidence or kind favor to the Prez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.W. Anderson</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/comment-page-1/#comment-87051</link>
		<dc:creator>S.W. Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 03:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/law-legal-matters/13655/white-house-backs-cheney-defends-veep-on-secrets-exemption/#comment-87051</guid>
		<description>I just have one question.  Since our creepy veep has flouted the law since 2003, why, exactly, isn&#039;t he being served articles of impeachment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just have one question.  Since our creepy veep has flouted the law since 2003, why, exactly, isn&#8217;t he being served articles of impeachment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
