<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Research Finds Firstborns Gain the Higher I.Q.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/13644/research-finds-firstborns-gain-the-higher-iq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13644/research-finds-firstborns-gain-the-higher-iq/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:18:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdledell</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13644/research-finds-firstborns-gain-the-higher-iq/comment-page-1/#comment-86941</link>
		<dc:creator>jdledell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 18:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/13644/research-finds-firstborns-gain-the-higher-iq/#comment-86941</guid>
		<description>The IQ difference was only 3 points. It&#039;s hard for me to get worked up about such a small difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IQ difference was only 3 points. It&#8217;s hard for me to get worked up about such a small difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carpeicthus</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13644/research-finds-firstborns-gain-the-higher-iq/comment-page-1/#comment-86902</link>
		<dc:creator>carpeicthus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/13644/research-finds-firstborns-gain-the-higher-iq/#comment-86902</guid>
		<description>&quot;homely&quot; -- maybe not the best choice, if your sister reads this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;homely&#8221; &#8212; maybe not the best choice, if your sister reads this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Steck</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13644/research-finds-firstborns-gain-the-higher-iq/comment-page-1/#comment-86886</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Steck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/13644/research-finds-firstborns-gain-the-higher-iq/#comment-86886</guid>
		<description>I was first-born to my biological mother but adopted as a middle child.  That&#039;s why studies focusing on order of children make no sense to me -- they conflate two very different variables:  birth order and position in the family during raising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was first-born to my biological mother but adopted as a middle child.  That&#8217;s why studies focusing on order of children make no sense to me &#8212; they conflate two very different variables:  birth order and position in the family during raising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynx</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13644/research-finds-firstborns-gain-the-higher-iq/comment-page-1/#comment-86874</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/13644/research-finds-firstborns-gain-the-higher-iq/#comment-86874</guid>
		<description>Well, being an only child, I don&#039;t see myself at all in this study, obviously. 

As to the &quot;exception to the rule&quot; thing one comment. I find these studies interesting certainly, but mostly in the academic sense. The things that influence intelligence are many; genetics (the vast majority of which is unknown) general health, socioeconomic background of the parents, socioeconomic situation as a child, level of stimulation in early childhood....the list goes on and on. It simply stands to reason that something as complex as intelligence would be influenced by many things. Additionally, I.Q testing is rarely totally without bias towards regular education. It&#039;s exceedingly hard to measure certain types of intelligence if the subject, for instance, doesn&#039;t know how to read. 

Again, studies in intelligence are fine and interesting, but no single one can be taken alone. Otherwise, you&#039;re going to find a gazillion exceptions to every &quot;rule&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, being an only child, I don&#8217;t see myself at all in this study, obviously. </p>
<p>As to the &#8220;exception to the rule&#8221; thing one comment. I find these studies interesting certainly, but mostly in the academic sense. The things that influence intelligence are many; genetics (the vast majority of which is unknown) general health, socioeconomic background of the parents, socioeconomic situation as a child, level of stimulation in early childhood&#8230;.the list goes on and on. It simply stands to reason that something as complex as intelligence would be influenced by many things. Additionally, I.Q testing is rarely totally without bias towards regular education. It&#8217;s exceedingly hard to measure certain types of intelligence if the subject, for instance, doesn&#8217;t know how to read. </p>
<p>Again, studies in intelligence are fine and interesting, but no single one can be taken alone. Otherwise, you&#8217;re going to find a gazillion exceptions to every &#8220;rule&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

