
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Conservatives Backing Rudy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 04:53:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kritter</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/comment-page-2/#comment-82848</link>
		<dc:creator>kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 13:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/#comment-82848</guid>
		<description>I agree with most of that post, CS. But the influence of those figures is also sometimes very real. In Sharpton&#039;s case- look at the Imus controversy. And I&#039;ve partially made the case for Falwell and Robertson, but didn&#039;t mention federal money that the Bush administration has given to faith-based charities. Look at the weekly calls to the WH from Ted Haggard before the scandal broke last year.

But,  I agree that activists on both sides get more heated up about wedge issues than regular folks, which is then exploited by our politicians in a divisive way. Also agree that quite often media  pundits with an agenda and politicians try to characterize the entire opposing party with the most extreme figures from that party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with most of that post, CS. But the influence of those figures is also sometimes very real. In Sharpton&#8217;s case- look at the Imus controversy. And I&#8217;ve partially made the case for Falwell and Robertson, but didn&#8217;t mention federal money that the Bush administration has given to faith-based charities. Look at the weekly calls to the WH from Ted Haggard before the scandal broke last year.</p>
<p>But,  I agree that activists on both sides get more heated up about wedge issues than regular folks, which is then exploited by our politicians in a divisive way. Also agree that quite often media  pundits with an agenda and politicians try to characterize the entire opposing party with the most extreme figures from that party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C Stanley</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/comment-page-2/#comment-82841</link>
		<dc:creator>C Stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 12:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/#comment-82841</guid>
		<description>Kim,
Jason already explained the concept of wedge issues- scroll back in the comment section. He gave a great explanation for why those politicians have courted voters that way even though the viewpoints aren&#039;t necessarily mainstream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kim,<br />
Jason already explained the concept of wedge issues- scroll back in the comment section. He gave a great explanation for why those politicians have courted voters that way even though the viewpoints aren&#8217;t necessarily mainstream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kritter</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/comment-page-2/#comment-82803</link>
		<dc:creator>kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 05:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/#comment-82803</guid>
		<description>Jason if that&#039;s true, why do Republican candidates work so hard to get the blessing of Falwell, Robertson and James Dobson? McCain, who in 2000 called Robertson and Falwell, agents of intolerance, went down and spoke at Liberty University.Newt went on Dobson&#039;s radio show to discuss why he wasn&#039;t a hypocrite for the affair he had during Clinton&#039;s impeachment. During the GOP debates, 3 candidates disavowed evolution, all but one disavowed the pro-choice position.

And evangelicals have helped the GOP with get-out-the-vote drives- especially in the South. They are still a powerful force in the Republican party.

Usually, I only bring Falwell and Robertson up when someone HERE claims that the left dances to tunes played by Michael Moore or Rosie o&#039;Donnell, but even without that they are still important voices in the party. Of course Falwell came up a lot last week when he died suddenly. I was amazed that some commenters defended him- crazy statements and all. I would have disavowed statements like that.  Their names also came up recently in posts about how the Bush admin. has 150 graduates of Regent University Law School (Robertson&#039;s). It was Monica Goodling&#039;s alma mater, and is considered a 4th rate law school. The admin. liked their ideology. 

So, I disagree with your major points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason if that&#8217;s true, why do Republican candidates work so hard to get the blessing of Falwell, Robertson and James Dobson? McCain, who in 2000 called Robertson and Falwell, agents of intolerance, went down and spoke at Liberty University.Newt went on Dobson&#8217;s radio show to discuss why he wasn&#8217;t a hypocrite for the affair he had during Clinton&#8217;s impeachment. During the GOP debates, 3 candidates disavowed evolution, all but one disavowed the pro-choice position.</p>
<p>And evangelicals have helped the GOP with get-out-the-vote drives- especially in the South. They are still a powerful force in the Republican party.</p>
<p>Usually, I only bring Falwell and Robertson up when someone HERE claims that the left dances to tunes played by Michael Moore or Rosie o&#8217;Donnell, but even without that they are still important voices in the party. Of course Falwell came up a lot last week when he died suddenly. I was amazed that some commenters defended him- crazy statements and all. I would have disavowed statements like that.  Their names also came up recently in posts about how the Bush admin. has 150 graduates of Regent University Law School (Robertson&#8217;s). It was Monica Goodling&#8217;s alma mater, and is considered a 4th rate law school. The admin. liked their ideology. </p>
<p>So, I disagree with your major points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveK</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/comment-page-2/#comment-82771</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 01:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/#comment-82771</guid>
		<description>Too Funny, I &#039;hand coded&#039; the a href= above and screwed it up...!

Here&#039;s that link again:

&lt;a href=&quot;https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/491&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;BBCodeXtra&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is an extension, compatible with Mozilla FireFox and Mozilla Suite, which adds to the context menu new commands to insert BBCode/Html/XHtml codes in an easy and fast way...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too Funny, I &#8216;hand coded&#8217; the a href= above and screwed it up&#8230;!</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s that link again:</p>
<p><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/491" rel="nofollow"><b>BBCodeXtra</b></a> is an extension, compatible with Mozilla FireFox and Mozilla Suite, which adds to the context menu new commands to insert BBCode/Html/XHtml codes in an easy and fast way&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveK</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/comment-page-2/#comment-82770</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 01:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/#comment-82770</guid>
		<description>DLS,

FWIW - Adding &lt;b&gt;Bold&lt;/b&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Italic&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;strike&gt;Strike&lt;/strike&gt;, etc. has always a real pain in the posterior. Since I&#039;m a lazy person AND since Mozilla FireFox had a FREE extension that does all the coding I need with just a right click and &lt;i&gt;select&lt;/i&gt;... I switched to the FireFox Browser.

Here&#039;s a link for more info...
 
href=&quot;https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/491&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;BBCodeXtra&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is an extension, compatible with Mozilla FireFox and Mozilla Suite, which adds to the context menu new commands to insert BBCode/Html/XHtml codes in an easy and fast way...

It&#039;s a great tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DLS,</p>
<p>FWIW &#8211; Adding <b>Bold</b>, <i>Italic</i>, <strike>Strike</strike>, etc. has always a real pain in the posterior. Since I&#8217;m a lazy person AND since Mozilla FireFox had a FREE extension that does all the coding I need with just a right click and <i>select</i>&#8230; I switched to the FireFox Browser.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a link for more info&#8230;</p>
<p>href=&#8221;https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/491&#8243;&gt;<b>BBCodeXtra</b> is an extension, compatible with Mozilla FireFox and Mozilla Suite, which adds to the context menu new commands to insert BBCode/Html/XHtml codes in an easy and fast way&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a great tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Steck</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/comment-page-2/#comment-82766</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Steck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 01:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/#comment-82766</guid>
		<description>Steve, you&#039;re right, it doesn&#039;t matter.  I don&#039;t understand why any criticism of the left has to be accompanied by an exact equal criticism of the right anyway.  Such a standard is certainly not applied to the leftist posters on TMV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, you&#8217;re right, it doesn&#8217;t matter.  I don&#8217;t understand why any criticism of the left has to be accompanied by an exact equal criticism of the right anyway.  Such a standard is certainly not applied to the leftist posters on TMV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveK</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/comment-page-2/#comment-82759</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 00:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/#comment-82759</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Jason Steck Says: 
Since I have specifically said that righties engage in the same thing, I am going to assume that you donâ€™t bother to read what I say before characterizing it and assigning me motives.&lt;/blockquote&gt;I picked a mild  &#039;example&#039; Jason and instead of trying to see the point I&#039;m trying to make you try to get out with a &#039;loophole&#039;. You may think you don&#039;t have an anti &quot;leftie&quot; slant but I have the right to disagree... You walk like a duck and fly like a duck and still don&#039;t understand who some think you quack like a duck, too.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Jason Steck ALSO Says:

...hurled in their face all the time by &lt;i&gt;self-righteous lefties who donâ€™t have a clue&lt;/i&gt; (or a care) about what their conservative interlocutors actually argue.

And it needs to stop. And &lt;i&gt;it will ONLY stop if some of the actual lefties around here start defending more than just â€œtheir sideâ€ &lt;/i&gt;when it does happen.

...I found myself more and more tempted to join the ranks of those who have simply been driven off by the &lt;i&gt;intolerance, particularly of the left.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

I found myself getting more and more alienated as those efforts were &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;always&lt;/b&gt; cast by the lefties&lt;/i&gt;...&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Jason, I have already spent all together too much time on this silliness... it&#039;s all off topic and really doesn&#039;t matter so go ahead and tell me how, and why, I&#039;m wrong / you&#039;re right and we&#039;ll move along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Jason Steck Says:<br />
Since I have specifically said that righties engage in the same thing, I am going to assume that you donâ€™t bother to read what I say before characterizing it and assigning me motives.</p></blockquote>
<p>I picked a mild  &#8216;example&#8217; Jason and instead of trying to see the point I&#8217;m trying to make you try to get out with a &#8216;loophole&#8217;. You may think you don&#8217;t have an anti &#8220;leftie&#8221; slant but I have the right to disagree&#8230; You walk like a duck and fly like a duck and still don&#8217;t understand who some think you quack like a duck, too.</p>
<blockquote><p>Jason Steck ALSO Says:</p>
<p>&#8230;hurled in their face all the time by <i>self-righteous lefties who donâ€™t have a clue</i> (or a care) about what their conservative interlocutors actually argue.</p>
<p>And it needs to stop. And <i>it will ONLY stop if some of the actual lefties around here start defending more than just â€œtheir sideâ€ </i>when it does happen.</p>
<p>&#8230;I found myself more and more tempted to join the ranks of those who have simply been driven off by the <i>intolerance, particularly of the left.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>I found myself getting more and more alienated as those efforts were <i><b>always</b> cast by the lefties</i>&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Jason, I have already spent all together too much time on this silliness&#8230; it&#8217;s all off topic and really doesn&#8217;t matter so go ahead and tell me how, and why, I&#8217;m wrong / you&#8217;re right and we&#8217;ll move along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/comment-page-2/#comment-82757</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 00:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/#comment-82757</guid>
		<description>&gt; More ike Bob Hope

Admittedly I do get wordy, even too wordy, too often.  When Holly in Cincinnati posts (she is concise), it is driven home extra hard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; More ike Bob Hope</p>
<p>Admittedly I do get wordy, even too wordy, too often.  When Holly in Cincinnati posts (she is concise), it is driven home extra hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Steck</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/comment-page-2/#comment-82751</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Steck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 00:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/#comment-82751</guid>
		<description>Also, if you are granting that no one HERE takes Robertson or Falwell seriously, why do so many of the commenters HERE keep throwing Robertson and Falwell in the face of those they deem to be &quot;conservatives&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, if you are granting that no one HERE takes Robertson or Falwell seriously, why do so many of the commenters HERE keep throwing Robertson and Falwell in the face of those they deem to be &#8220;conservatives&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Steck</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/comment-page-2/#comment-82749</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Steck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 00:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/#comment-82749</guid>
		<description>Well, in order to show &quot;influence&quot; even in that more limited scope, you would need to prove that the evangelical voters would not have voted Republican anyway except for the endorsements of Falwell and/or Robertson.  And I don&#039;t think you can make that case.  

The Christian Coalition effectively went out of business over a decade ago.  The only people getting the voter guides were the already-converted.  I don&#039;t think there is any remaining &quot;influence&quot; and I certainly think there is no evidence that evangelicals think that Katrina was the &quot;wrath of God&quot; rather than, you know, a weather event that exposed massive bureaucratic deficiencies in state, local, AND federal government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, in order to show &#8220;influence&#8221; even in that more limited scope, you would need to prove that the evangelical voters would not have voted Republican anyway except for the endorsements of Falwell and/or Robertson.  And I don&#8217;t think you can make that case.  </p>
<p>The Christian Coalition effectively went out of business over a decade ago.  The only people getting the voter guides were the already-converted.  I don&#8217;t think there is any remaining &#8220;influence&#8221; and I certainly think there is no evidence that evangelicals think that Katrina was the &#8220;wrath of God&#8221; rather than, you know, a weather event that exposed massive bureaucratic deficiencies in state, local, AND federal government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kritter</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/comment-page-2/#comment-82745</link>
		<dc:creator>kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 00:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/#comment-82745</guid>
		<description>Well I don&#039;t think anyone HERE takes Robertson or Falwell that seriously, but I do think that they have had considerable influence on the evangelical vote through the Christian Coalition, which handed out voter guides and organized turnout in the last several elections. Most evangelicals voted for Republican candidates. But probably commenters here think they&#039;re both a little nuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I don&#8217;t think anyone HERE takes Robertson or Falwell that seriously, but I do think that they have had considerable influence on the evangelical vote through the Christian Coalition, which handed out voter guides and organized turnout in the last several elections. Most evangelicals voted for Republican candidates. But probably commenters here think they&#8217;re both a little nuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveK</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/comment-page-2/#comment-82743</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 23:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/#comment-82743</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I take it you referred to my short length per line rather than the practice of trimming...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

DLS,

Absolutely, I did not/ do not mean to imply you were dropping or altering others words. More ike Bob Hope... he could make a one liner take three lines just cause he could! :)

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I take it you referred to my short length per line rather than the practice of trimming&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>DLS,</p>
<p>Absolutely, I did not/ do not mean to imply you were dropping or altering others words. More ike Bob Hope&#8230; he could make a one liner take three lines just cause he could! <img src='http://themoderatevoice.com/wordpress-engine/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Steck</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/comment-page-1/#comment-82741</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Steck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 23:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/#comment-82741</guid>
		<description>I think Michael Moore is ideological popcorn for the left -- they eagerly munch on it during the show, but they don&#039;t rely on him for serious policymaking nutrition.  I think it would be very helpful if some on the left were to make the same observation about people like Robertson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Michael Moore is ideological popcorn for the left &#8212; they eagerly munch on it during the show, but they don&#8217;t rely on him for serious policymaking nutrition.  I think it would be very helpful if some on the left were to make the same observation about people like Robertson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kritter</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/comment-page-1/#comment-82740</link>
		<dc:creator>kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 23:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/#comment-82740</guid>
		<description>Jason- I&#039;m not saying its right or wrong- just saying both sides do it. MvdG wrote a piece last week on a letter that MM wrote stating that he intended to organize against those in congress who voted to extend the funding for the surge. It was supposed to show fascist tendencies in the Democratic party.

Conservative commenters argued with me when I pointed out that he doesn&#039;t speak for the DNC- he&#039;s just out there on the fringes.

MvdG might have written it on his own site, not really sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason- I&#8217;m not saying its right or wrong- just saying both sides do it. MvdG wrote a piece last week on a letter that MM wrote stating that he intended to organize against those in congress who voted to extend the funding for the surge. It was supposed to show fascist tendencies in the Democratic party.</p>
<p>Conservative commenters argued with me when I pointed out that he doesn&#8217;t speak for the DNC- he&#8217;s just out there on the fringes.</p>
<p>MvdG might have written it on his own site, not really sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/comment-page-1/#comment-82733</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/#comment-82733</guid>
		<description>Steve K. said:

[trying]

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;nothing worse then looking stupid while trying to help.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Are you sure?  I wasn&#039;t trying to help anybody the last time I looked stupid.

Thanks for the advice.

I take it you referred to my short length per line rather than the practice of trimming (so far, no false charges on here about quoting &quot;out of context&quot; after I removed what can be considered extraneous).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve K. said:</p>
<p>[trying]</p>
<blockquote><p><b>nothing worse then looking stupid while trying to help.</b></p></blockquote>
<p>Are you sure?  I wasn&#8217;t trying to help anybody the last time I looked stupid.</p>
<p>Thanks for the advice.</p>
<p>I take it you referred to my short length per line rather than the practice of trimming (so far, no false charges on here about quoting &#8220;out of context&#8221; after I removed what can be considered extraneous).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Steck</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/comment-page-1/#comment-82732</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Steck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 23:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/#comment-82732</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You attempt to sell the idea that only lefties resort to intolerance&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Since I have specifically said that righties engage in the same thing, I am going to assume that you don&#039;t bother to read what I say before characterizing it and assigning me motives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You attempt to sell the idea that only lefties resort to intolerance</p></blockquote>
<p>Since I have specifically said that righties engage in the same thing, I am going to assume that you don&#8217;t bother to read what I say before characterizing it and assigning me motives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveK</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/comment-page-1/#comment-82731</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 23:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/#comment-82731</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Jason Steck Says: 
I generally prefer the term â€œleftistsâ€...&lt;/blockquote&gt;Jason,

You may, as you say, prefer &quot;leftists&quot; (a good descriptive noun) but you USE &quot;lefties&quot;. And, when read in context, it is obvious that are using it as a pejorative. (i.e. &quot;......hurled in their face all the time by self-righteous lefties who donâ€™t have a clue (or a care) about what their conservative interlocutors actually argue.)

You attempt to sell the idea that only lefties resort to intolerance and snark is, at best, disingenuous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Jason Steck Says:<br />
I generally prefer the term â€œleftistsâ€&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Jason,</p>
<p>You may, as you say, prefer &#8220;leftists&#8221; (a good descriptive noun) but you USE &#8220;lefties&#8221;. And, when read in context, it is obvious that are using it as a pejorative. (i.e. &#8220;&#8230;&#8230;hurled in their face all the time by self-righteous lefties who donâ€™t have a clue (or a care) about what their conservative interlocutors actually argue.)</p>
<p>You attempt to sell the idea that only lefties resort to intolerance and snark is, at best, disingenuous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Steck</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/comment-page-1/#comment-82721</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Steck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 22:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/#comment-82721</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Well, social conservatives like Robertson and Falwell do have a lot of political influence with the Christian right. When they blame Katrina and 9/11 on gays, secular progressives, and feminists (and other sub-groups of the Democratic party,lol) many of the faithful believe.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Never seen any of them around here.  In fact, I have seen no evidence of this influence at all.

&lt;blockquote&gt;And is that any worse than bringing up Michael Moore as though he was the chair for the DNC, which the righties love to do?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

1) no evidence of this happening anywhere on TMV

2) even if the righties did do that, do you think it justifies your side doing the same?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Well, social conservatives like Robertson and Falwell do have a lot of political influence with the Christian right. When they blame Katrina and 9/11 on gays, secular progressives, and feminists (and other sub-groups of the Democratic party,lol) many of the faithful believe.</p></blockquote>
<p>Never seen any of them around here.  In fact, I have seen no evidence of this influence at all.</p>
<blockquote><p>And is that any worse than bringing up Michael Moore as though he was the chair for the DNC, which the righties love to do?</p></blockquote>
<p>1) no evidence of this happening anywhere on TMV</p>
<p>2) even if the righties did do that, do you think it justifies your side doing the same?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kritter</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/comment-page-1/#comment-82719</link>
		<dc:creator>kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 22:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/#comment-82719</guid>
		<description>Well, social conservatives like Robertson and Falwell do have a lot of political influence with the Christian right. When they blame Katrina and 9/11 on gays, secular progressives, and feminists (and other sub-groups of the Democratic party,lol) many of the faithful believe. 

And is that any worse than bringing up Michael Moore as though he was the chair for the DNC, which the righties love to do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, social conservatives like Robertson and Falwell do have a lot of political influence with the Christian right. When they blame Katrina and 9/11 on gays, secular progressives, and feminists (and other sub-groups of the Democratic party,lol) many of the faithful believe. </p>
<p>And is that any worse than bringing up Michael Moore as though he was the chair for the DNC, which the righties love to do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveK</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/comment-page-1/#comment-82718</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 22:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/13104/social-conservatives-backing-rudy/#comment-82718</guid>
		<description>DLS,

Your method of shorting sentences when you quote others sometimes makes it difficult to follow... 

FYI, here&#039;s the code for blockquotes.

This:
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;selected text you are quoting&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Will give you this:
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;selected text you are quoting&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

PS - Boy I sure hope this code works... nothing worse then looking stupid while trying to help. :-}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DLS,</p>
<p>Your method of shorting sentences when you quote others sometimes makes it difficult to follow&#8230; </p>
<p>FYI, here&#8217;s the code for blockquotes.</p>
<p>This:<br />
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;selected text you are quoting&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</p>
<p>Will give you this:</p>
<blockquote><p><b>selected text you are quoting</b></p></blockquote>
<p>PS &#8211; Boy I sure hope this code works&#8230; nothing worse then looking stupid while trying to help. :-}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

