An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right

Richardson To Stop Using Name of Fallen Soldier

Governor Bill Richardson told MSNBC’s Tim Russert that he would stop mentioning an American soldier who died in Iraq back in ’04. Richardson shared the story of Lance Cpl. Aaron Austin on several occasions.

Lance Cpl. Aaron Austin died a heroic death in 2004:

The Marines were searching buildings in the war-torn Jolan neighborhood when they came under attack in one of the bloodiest clashes between the U.S. military and insurgents that spring.

Austin helped evacuate the wounded and led other Marines onto a roof to operate a machine gun. When the insurgents kept advancing, he took a grenade from his vest and moved into the open for a better throwing position.

“Several enemy bullets struck Lance Cpl. Austin in the chest,” said the official Marine Corps account. “Undaunted by his injury and with heroic effort, he threw his hand grenade at the enemy on the adjacent rooftop.”

The grenade hit the bull’s-eye and forced the insurgents to halt their attack.

When the battle was over, Marines erected a makeshift memorial to Austin in one of the buildings they had fought to defend.

Richardson, meanwhile, adds to the story that when he met the mother of Lance Cpl. Austin, she showed him the check she received from the government, which was only $11,000. According to Richardson, this motivated him “to go to the New Mexico legislature and propose a $250,000 death benefit—life insurance—for every National Guardsman in New Mexico.” The mother denies showing Richardson the check or talking with him about money.

Richardson:

Tim, she—we have different recollections. That family is heroic, that young man is heroic. But let me tell you what that—my attending that ceremony caused. It inspired me to go to the New Mexico legislature and propose a $250,000 death benefit—life insurance—for every National Guardsman in New Mexico. It’s now $400,000. It passed. I made it happen. And then 30 other states—I went to the National Governors Association, and we pushed this–30 other states have made this happen. And the federal death benefit has gone up.

Now, I, I fully respect that family. We have different recollections. But that’s where I learned, at that ceremony, that the death benefit for our soldiers was $11,000. And look, Tim, I am not going to—there is nobody that has done more for veterans, any governor, I believe, than I have. No state income tax for enlisted people. I was just in North Korea two months ago, and I brought back—I’ve been working on this for years—the remains of six Americans from the Korean War. All kinds of initiatives, such as this life insurance policy that has been…

MR. RUSSERT: But if it troubles her, out of respect for Mrs. Miller and her son Aaron Austin, will you stop using his name and her name?

GOV. RICHARDSON: Yes, I will. I will do that. But we just have different recollections, Tim, and—but, but that family is honorable. I attended that service. I was really moved. You know, I call as many of the mothers of New Mexico soldiers that’ve been killed. But no one will ever question my commitment to help our veterans. I was in North Korea. I rescued—I helped rescue, helped push forward the release of—many years ago—of, of an American helicopter pilot. So I believe very strongly that we have to stand up for our veterans when they come back, coming back PTSD, they’re not getting the help that they deserve.

MR. RUSSERT: But if Mrs. Miller feels used, you would apologize for it.

GOV. RICHARDSON: Well, Tim, I—that’s where I learned about this death benefit. There was an individual there that saw a piece of paper being given to me. I, I don’t want to get into this. I want this to—I respect that woman. I will not mention it again.

It seems to me that Governor Richardson would be wise not to mention Austin again. I cannot possibly say whether his recollection of what happened is accurate or not, but I can say, however, that it is politically a bit silly to piss off a mother who lost her son in the war in Iraq.

Cross posted at my own blog.



opinions powered by SendLove.to

11 Responses to “Richardson To Stop Using Name of Fallen Soldier”

  1. kritter says:

    I saw part of this interview and had to turn it off. Mr. Richardson, who has so much appeal on paper, was not really honest on this and some other issues. Let me just say, that I had seriously considered supporting him, but did not find him at all credible in the interview. He at first refused to apologize to this mother, and had to be pinned down by Russert before he finally did- of course still claiming he had done nothing wrong.

  2. mcr1268 says:

    If you are a supporter of this man, or are considering him….go read the transcript or watch the video on Meet the Press. Then spread the word. I think this man is dangerous !

  3. Jason Steck says:

    Cindy Sheehan and the rest of her group used the names of hundreds of American servicemen in their anti-war displays without their families permission and, in several cases, against the express and repeated wishes of the families.

  4. kritter says:

    There’s been wrongs done on both sides of this issue as the Pat Tillman case shows us.

  5. Nick Rivera says:

    Bill Richardson did himself no favors on yesterday’s Meet the Press. Russert absolutely pilloried Richardson on his numerous flip-flops, using Richardson’s book as evidence of numerous instances in which the New Mexico Governor and former Energy Secretary has changed his position.

    Some libertarians have praised Richardson for some of his more libertarian views (i.e. supporting legalization of medical marijuana, voting to repeal the assault weapons ban, cutting taxes), but I doubt many libertarians will support him after this interview. Richardson completely fumbled the assault-weapons question:

    MR. RUSSERT: Let me turn to gun control, and this is an article from your Sante Fe Mexican newspaper. “Listening to U.S. Representative Bill Richardson”—senior congressman—“explain his position on gun control to a Sante Fe audience is like watching Fred Astaire dance. ‘I voted to repeal the assault weapons ban because it’s always been my view that occasionally a member of Congress on an issue where he or she has some difficulty in justifying a vote, that I should respect the wishes of my constituents. In this case, the strong majority favor repealing the ban. That doesn’t mean it’s the right vote.’”

    You voted to ban assault weapons, uzis, street sweepers, then you voted to repeal it, and you’re basically saying, “Well I know it’s not the right vote but my constituents want it, therefore, I’ll give it to them.”

    GOV. RICHARDSON: Well, listen, I know—I’ve been in public life 25 years. I was the whip when President Clinton was—I was the whip, in other words, in charge of getting some of those votes for the crime bill, which put 100,000 cops on the street, which took some of those initiatives. But, look, Tim, you know, I—I’m a gun owner. I’m a western governor. I believe the issue is not gun control. The issue, as, as happened in, in Virginia Tech where I, I just—those—the tragedy there, the issue is instant background checks. I am for instant background—I am for a bill that Carolyn McCarthy is doing now in the House of Representatives which tightens background checks, which, which says…

    MR. RUSSERT: Well, why do hunters need street sweepers or uzi machine guns. You voted to ban those. As president, would you seek to ban assault weapons.

    GOV. RICHARDSON: Tim, Tim, the assault weapons ban did not work. It didn’t work.

    MR. RUSSERT: So you would…

    GOV. RICHARDSON: It didn’t work.

    MR. RUSSERT: You wouldn’t do that as president?

    GOV. RICHARDSON: It didn’t work. What I would do is I would focus more of our efforts—for instance, background checks with those with criminal backgrounds and the mentally ill. We have to tighten up those background checks. I am for doing that. I am for do—but the problem is the states don’t have the database, the resources.

    MR. RUSSERT: OK. You received the endorsement of the National Rifle Association, NRA, running for governor. There’s a picture of you at their podium heartily accepting their endorsement. Would you accept the endorsement of the NRA for president?

    GOV. RICHARDSON: Yes, I would. I’m a gun owner. You know, Tim, gun control shouldn’t be a litmus test in the Democratic Party. I am for reasonable controls on—I don’t want to see uzis when you’re hunting, obviously, but…

    MR. RUSSERT: But you wouldn’t ban them.

    GOV. RICHARDSON: …this is the West. But, Tim, I’m a western governor. It’s a cultural issue. I am for strong law enforcement, putting criminals—I have a very strong law enforcement record. I believe it’s not necessarily a gun control issue. Let’s look at some of the issues affecting the mentally ill, the fact that mental health doesn’t have parity with other illnesses. The instant background checks are critically important. I’m for that. You don’t want anybody with a criminal background or mentally ill having these—and I think Representative McCarthy, who is one of the strongest advocates for gun control is—I am for that.

    MR. RUSSERT: But the—being the NRA’s man is not going to be popular in some Democratic primaries.

    GOV. RICHARDSON: Well, I—you know, I don’t, I don’t change my positions to run for president.

    MR. RUSSERT: Well, you did on assault weapons.

    GOV. RICHARDSON: I don’t change my positions.

    MR. RUSSERT: But you did change it on assault weapons.

    GOV. RICHARDSON: But, Tim, that was a vote as part of an overall bill that President Clinton proposed.

    Richardson seems to being saying that in his heart, he sympathizes with the gun control platform of the Democrats and that he supported the repeal of the assault weapons ban only because such a position is popular with his New Mexico constituents.

    There were several other instances in which Richardson appeared to be guilty of flip-flopping (i.e. the war in Iraq, immigration, his favorite Supreme Court Justice).

    And then there was the accusation regarding the mother of the fallen Lance Corporal that MvdG mentioned above. It’s impossible to know who’s “recollection” of the events is true, but Richardson certainly didn’t come out that well from the discussion of this issue.

    It was somewhat disappointing to watch Richardson flounder so badly on national television given his impressive resume and apparent willingness as a western governor a take the Democratic Party in a more fiscally conservative, socially libertarian direction.

  6. Stephen Cassidy says:

    You need to read the original Associate Press story on this matter, which has a third party supporting Richardson’s version. This is another example of no good deed goes unpunished.

    Think of the big picture: Because of Richardson the death of a soldier abroad is no longer the financial ruin of the soldier’s family. The family has enough money to keep their house and send the kids to college. 35 other states have now followed New Mexico’s lead.

    Following the funeral Richardson took action. Upon learning of the low death benefit, Richardson went to the New Mexico legislature and got the death benefit for fallen New Mexico national guardsmen and women raised. The benefit now stands at $400,000.

    Here are some of the other actions Richardson has take to support veterans in New Mexico. It would be great if all governors showed his wisdom, leadership and compassion:

    * Elevated Veterans’ Affairs to his Cabinet, creating the Department of Veteran Services.
    * Eliminated state income tax for all active-duty military pay.
    * Granted extensions for activated Guard personnel to file state taxes.
    * Granted a grace period for expired drivers’ licenses for Guard personnel.
    * Offered tuition refunds or credits to Guard personnel currently enrolled in school.
    * Provided free hunting and fishing licenses to all veterans for one year following their redeployment back to the U.S.
    * Granted free tuition to any New Mexico Public University for any child of a New Mexican
    Guardsman killed in action.
    * Committed to easing the transition between employers and their employees who have been called to serve.
    * Granted administrative leave to state employees with family members returning from Iraq.
    * Authorized 15 extra days of military leave for every soldier who’s been deployed.
    * Presented former Iraqi Freedom POW Spc. Joseph Hudson with the very first “Spirit of
    New Mexico” Award, which is designed to recognize New Mexicans who demonstrate extraordinary courage, leadership, and devotion to state and country.
    * Invested in veterans’ services:
    - Created Vietnam Veterans Memorials in Santa Fe and Angel Fire, NM.
    - Funded construction and renovations for veterans’ memorials around the state, including in Farmington, Las Cruces, Gallup, Taos, T or C, and Mora, NM.
    - Provided funding to the Department of Navajo Veterans’ Affairs.

  7. kritter says:

    I agree that his achievements are commendable, but his performance was pitiful. He doesn’t seem to have the political skill to answer the tough questions that a presidential candidate has to answer about his inconsistencies. He has a tremendous record, but after that performance I found myself wondering how he even got elected governor of New Mexico.

  8. Dr. Clarissa Pinkola Estés says:

    On the issue of the mother and her soldier son and BR, good post mvdg. I’ve just put up a post on TMV about why soldiers dont speak of their war stories often. They loathe it when a politician or media person ‘uses’ their story to make political gain, advert hay, while the story, to the soldier and/or family, remains sacred.

    dr.e.

  9. DLS says:

    Another one (candidate) bites the dust, it seems.

  10. kritter says:

    Its a little early for that, isn’t it? But, I admit the appearance was not a positive one. We had neighbors originally from New Mexico over for BBQ, and they claim he’s been a great governor??

  11. DLS says:

    Another one (candidate) bites the dust

    Its a little early for that, isn’t it?

    I’d say so, normally; that should be the theme song whenever someone announces the end of his or her campaign. But this may have been a fatal blunder early in the campaign.

© 2003-2011 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Mode Equity