
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rasmussen Poll: Public Overwhelmingly Against Immigration Plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/13018/rasmussen-poll-public-overwhemlingly-against-immigration-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13018/rasmussen-poll-public-overwhemlingly-against-immigration-plan/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 02:02:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Volunteer Voters &#187; Headlines And Hyperlinks</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13018/rasmussen-poll-public-overwhemlingly-against-immigration-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-82194</link>
		<dc:creator>Volunteer Voters &#187; Headlines And Hyperlinks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 23:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/law-legal-matters/13018/rasmussen-poll-public-overwhemlingly-against-immigration-plan/#comment-82194</guid>
		<description>[...] Rasmussen Poll: Public Overwhemlingly Against Immigration Plan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rasmussen Poll: Public Overwhemlingly Against Immigration Plan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveK</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13018/rasmussen-poll-public-overwhemlingly-against-immigration-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-82191</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 22:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/law-legal-matters/13018/rasmussen-poll-public-overwhemlingly-against-immigration-plan/#comment-82191</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;DLS Says:

We need a points system or otherwise an individual evaluation for legal admission in place of Sixties-fluff â€œfamily reunification.â€&lt;/blockquote&gt;DLS - Your flippant remark equating family reunification to &quot;Sixties-Fluff&quot; speaks volumes. It says a lot about you, your basic values, and your opinion of â€œthe family unitâ€ in generalâ€¦ Your comment makes me glad that Iâ€™m a product of the â€˜60s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>DLS Says:</p>
<p>We need a points system or otherwise an individual evaluation for legal admission in place of Sixties-fluff â€œfamily reunification.â€</p></blockquote>
<p>DLS &#8211; Your flippant remark equating family reunification to &#8220;Sixties-Fluff&#8221; speaks volumes. It says a lot about you, your basic values, and your opinion of â€œthe family unitâ€ in generalâ€¦ Your comment makes me glad that Iâ€™m a product of the â€˜60s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13018/rasmussen-poll-public-overwhemlingly-against-immigration-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-82109</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 16:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/law-legal-matters/13018/rasmussen-poll-public-overwhemlingly-against-immigration-plan/#comment-82109</guid>
		<description>We need a points system or otherwise an individual evaluation for legal admission in place of Sixties-fluff &quot;family reunification.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need a points system or otherwise an individual evaluation for legal admission in place of Sixties-fluff &#8220;family reunification.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: casualobserver</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/13018/rasmussen-poll-public-overwhemlingly-against-immigration-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-82087</link>
		<dc:creator>casualobserver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 15:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/law-legal-matters/13018/rasmussen-poll-public-overwhemlingly-against-immigration-plan/#comment-82087</guid>
		<description>Give credit to Jason Steck for his forecasting of the new &quot;third rail of politics&quot; last week.

If both sides of the aisle acknowledge &quot;you listen to the generals&quot; for purposes of executing a war, why though should it be so incomprehensible to listen to the border agents on improving controls over immigration?........fences are most useful only in urban zones, otherwise, one agent for every 5 miles. Given here is one issue that &quot;throwing a little more money at it&quot; seems like it really would be an effective solution, why not do the border security first?

Why legislators don&#039;t understand the notion of &quot;re-establish credibility first&quot; would go such a long way with voters, I don&#039;t know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give credit to Jason Steck for his forecasting of the new &#8220;third rail of politics&#8221; last week.</p>
<p>If both sides of the aisle acknowledge &#8220;you listen to the generals&#8221; for purposes of executing a war, why though should it be so incomprehensible to listen to the border agents on improving controls over immigration?&#8230;&#8230;..fences are most useful only in urban zones, otherwise, one agent for every 5 miles. Given here is one issue that &#8220;throwing a little more money at it&#8221; seems like it really would be an effective solution, why not do the border security first?</p>
<p>Why legislators don&#8217;t understand the notion of &#8220;re-establish credibility first&#8221; would go such a long way with voters, I don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

