Ezra Klein, in his analysis of last night’s Republican Candidates debate, writes: “The candidates vying for the GOP’s 2012 presidential nomination want to force history backward.” If there is one thing all of them want to do, it is to repeal everything the Obama Administration has done — and then go much further than that:
Their proposals to roll back the growth and complexity of the state did not stop with the financial sector. Former Utah governor Jon Huntsman promoted his plan to “clean all of the loopholes and the deductions” out of the tax code, which would mean removing the mortgage-interest deduction and the exclusion for employer-based health care, just for starters.
Cain scoffed at such incrementalism. His 9-9-9 plan, he said, “starts with throwing out the current tax code,” and then replaces it with a 9 percent sales tax, a 9 percent income tax and a 9 percent corporate tax.
Paul was not impressed. “What I hear here is just tinkering with the current system and not looking at something new and different,” he said, going on to suggest “a free-market economy without a Federal Reserve system.” That would be new and different.
Like petulant children intent on banishing adults from their world, the Republicans see one cause for all of the country’s problems — too much government. Not one of them will consider the possibility that those problems are the result of past Republican attempts to eviscerate government. And not one of them considers the consequences of what they propose. Klein writes that:
If every idea uttered around moderator Charlie Rose’s table was made into law tomorrow, the financial-regulation bill would be gone, as would health-care reform and the Federal Reserve. The tax credits that support the housing market would vanish, and so too would Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-backed housing giants that guarantee the majority of new loans. There would be a balanced-budget amendment to the Constitution, which would require more than $1 trillion in spending cuts if it was to be satisfied in 2013, and China would be branded a currency manipulator.
Simple minds propose simple solutions — and see the future in a rear view mirror.
Owen Gray grew up in Montreal, where he received a B. A. from Concordia University. After crossing the border and completing a Master’s degree at the University of North Carolina, he returned to Canada, married, raised a family and taught high school for 32 years. Now retired, he lives — with his wife and youngest son — on the northern shores of Lake Ontario. This post is cross posted from his blog.
Nailed it! Want to see things get interesting? Put any one of these jokers into the White House, then sit back and watch the fun. Think class warfare can’t get any worse? How about a war with Iran? More tax cuts for the rich? Less regulation? And while they’re at it, maybe “tweak” social security, afterall it’s just a Ponzi scheme! And that darned EPA, such a nuisance. Time to turn things around! America! F yeah!
I take exception to the idea that small gov’t is a good thing. Countries with weak central gov’ts are crappy countries. Name me one that isn’t a total crapfest. Even this country we relatively a minor player on the world scene until the Central gov’t started doing things like, you know, charging an income tax and raising money. You know what happened? Things got really good really fast. The world is loaded with examples of what countries look like without a strong central gov’t. So is history. How these morons can sit there, looking at history and even the current world, and still blather on about how much better we’d all be if we had no gov’t is beyond me. Its beyond stupid. Its beyond my words.
I tended to express it as simple answers for simple minds. Every one of them proposes answers that in fact were largely tried before. Back in the 19th century. They deny this but that’s really what it comes down to. If you want to see how their idea of paradise really looked just read some Dickens.
Frankly if you polled a bunch of 6th graders on how to fix the problems in this country, you’d get roughly the same talking points you would from the GOP field of nominees.