This might be a bit of tension with my qualified defense of hip-hop, but I think American University Professor Darren Hutchinson’s post documenting Al Sharpton’s criticisms of misogyny and violence in rap music was quite illuminating–especially for those folks falling over themselves to try and use hip-hop as evidence of his hypocrisy in the Don Imus case.
It’s impossible to claim that Jackson or Sharpton have not protested rap music. The argument then becomes that they haven’t protested them enough, and who gets to decide that?
Chris, it’s not that hard to judge, actually, Has started outcries like they did over Imus in the case of any single rapper? Has dragged rappers who pepper their lyrics with slander and humiliation towards black women regularly onto a program to receive a full dressing down, demanded they apologize and encourage companies to fire them? It’s good that he criticizes rap lyrics, but pretending that the treatment Imus got has nothing to do with the fact that he’s white, and that had he been black this would have made a single headline is disingenuous, at best.
pardon my atrocious grammer, I’ve been up all of 5 minutes and it shows.
Who cares what Sharpton says about rap? The problem with Sharpton isn’t that he’s a hypocrite, it that he is a vicious anti-semite. He has all the moral standing to speak on matters of race as a grand kleage of the KKK.
More words of “wisdom” from the “reverend”.
Richard Horton — clearly you do not know much about the Klan. The Klan was organized to terrorize and lynch blacks in the south to keep them from voting, exercising any rights and liberties, and to keep them in “their place.” They murdered thousands over the years, usually with state sanction. Please do not invoke the KKK as a comparison to Shaprton. It is grossly inaccurate.
Finally, the matter of how strongly Sharpton complained about hip hop versus Imus is a fair question, but I think it gives Sharpton too much power in this setting and fails to look at other factors. First of all, people were able to become outraged over Imus because of whom he attacked — college students, females, underdogs who made it to the national championship game only to lose to a chronic powerhouse. They had the national attention. Plus, the cumulative impact of Imus’ comments made him an easy target. Also, women’s groups got involved – not just Sharpton and Jackon. NOW, and women’s athletics also staged protests. The Rutgers team spoke out. The internet fueled the story everywhere. Advertisers withdrew sponsorship. The writing was all the wall. These events are lagers than Sharpton ever was. If corporate sponsors backed out of hip hop as they did with Imus, hip hop would reform or dry up as well. The fact is, however, that people really do not care about black women being insulted by black men (with a few exceptions – including Sharpton). Hip Hop brings in billions of dollars. Too many wealthy executives are not going to let a boycott of hip hop take place.
From my homie Frank Longo ^ok
Let’s talk about political commentary in popular rap songs.
Yeah Tony, what’s a few dead jews matter anyway, right?
[...] MORE:Â Interesting angle on The Reverand Al and rap lyrics. [...]
richard how could you possibly come to that conclusion based on tony’s comment? i agree with everything he said. i am so tired of hearing eurpean americans saying “well rap lyrics are worse than what he said” as if every black person supports rap. rev sharpton has continuously tried to get these artists to stop using such degrading remarks but, as tony said he doesnt have the support of the people who are financially backing them that are in turn financially benefitting off of them. and why do european americans care if some black people choose to use certain terms with each other? is it a deep craving or desire to call someone the “n” word? and what is an apology? should rev.sharpton give a false apology to appease certain individuals? why if it is not sincere? imus apologized yet started talking crap again, what was the purpose, just so he can say he said sorry? i thank God for men like rev.sharpton that does what he feels is right regardless of what the masses say. like with tawana brawley(spelling?) im glad he didnt apologize, i think the girl told the truth. the attacker did not go to trial and get an acquittal nor was he exonerated, there was insufficient evidence to prosecute, the case is still open. people dont know what words really mean. a lot of cases dont go through due to insufficient evidence, doesnt mean it didnt happen, just means, they cant prove it=not proven=insufficient evidence