
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Will Not Partake in Fox/CBC Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 20:45:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: themiddle</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-72199</link>
		<dc:creator>themiddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 01:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/#comment-72199</guid>
		<description>I think the problem is that Fox is just an editorial network, and why would a democrat want to appear in an editorial where they are going to be slammed. I think deomcrats do the right thing by not going on Fox, but I think they should extend it to a total boycott of the network. There is aboslutely nothing to gain by being on any of their shows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the problem is that Fox is just an editorial network, and why would a democrat want to appear in an editorial where they are going to be slammed. I think deomcrats do the right thing by not going on Fox, but I think they should extend it to a total boycott of the network. There is aboslutely nothing to gain by being on any of their shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-72172</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/#comment-72172</guid>
		<description>&gt; â€œliberal MSMâ€? canard! 

  Wrong again.  I recommend you pull out of your nosedive -- it would look better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; â€œliberal MSMâ€? canard! </p>
<p>  Wrong again.  I recommend you pull out of your nosedive &#8212; it would look better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kritter</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-72030</link>
		<dc:creator>kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/#comment-72030</guid>
		<description>Not the old, its all the fault of the &quot;liberal MSM&quot; canard! DLS- when was the last time you changed stations????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not the old, its all the fault of the &#8220;liberal MSM&#8221; canard! DLS- when was the last time you changed stations????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-72001</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/#comment-72001</guid>
		<description>Liberal media only need apply, not sometimes-not-so-liberal media like Fox.  It&#039;s no surprise that the Dims would do this to Fox; the liberal media itself treats Fox like a heretic or traitor for not following the Party Line and politically correct &quot;journalistic&quot; ideology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberal media only need apply, not sometimes-not-so-liberal media like Fox.  It&#8217;s no surprise that the Dims would do this to Fox; the liberal media itself treats Fox like a heretic or traitor for not following the Party Line and politically correct &#8220;journalistic&#8221; ideology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nobody</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-71949</link>
		<dc:creator>Nobody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/#comment-71949</guid>
		<description>Space Lynx.  Its all about space.  Nobody read it anyway cause it was too long.

And the one person who did.  White AGent.....lol....he musta thought I was being serious.

I did another piece over in the I want an Ipod and I dont think anyone read that one cause it was too long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Space Lynx.  Its all about space.  Nobody read it anyway cause it was too long.</p>
<p>And the one person who did.  White AGent&#8230;..lol&#8230;.he musta thought I was being serious.</p>
<p>I did another piece over in the I want an Ipod and I dont think anyone read that one cause it was too long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynx</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-71894</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/#comment-71894</guid>
		<description>Nobody, you should do that for a living LOL. Very well done, though to be totally acurate you would need to add some interruptions by O&#039;Reilly and a few &quot;shutup!&quot;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody, you should do that for a living LOL. Very well done, though to be totally acurate you would need to add some interruptions by O&#8217;Reilly and a few &#8220;shutup!&#8221;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kritter</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-71857</link>
		<dc:creator>kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 04:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/#comment-71857</guid>
		<description>Its true. Fox is nothing but a mouthpiece for the RNC. They are nothing but this administration&#039;s talking points and propaganda. They thrive on trashing liberals.

Why should the Democrats allow them any piece of the action in &#039;08?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its true. Fox is nothing but a mouthpiece for the RNC. They are nothing but this administration&#8217;s talking points and propaganda. They thrive on trashing liberals.</p>
<p>Why should the Democrats allow them any piece of the action in &#8217;08?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carpeicthus</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-71853</link>
		<dc:creator>carpeicthus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 04:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/#comment-71853</guid>
		<description>I agree that Obama actually has a better excuse than the others to avoid Fox, but why avoid them? Clinton did go on, and to use the vernacular, he pwn3d it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Obama actually has a better excuse than the others to avoid Fox, but why avoid them? Clinton did go on, and to use the vernacular, he pwn3d it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: White Agent</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-71835</link>
		<dc:creator>White Agent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 02:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/#comment-71835</guid>
		<description>[Holly in Cincinnati Says: 

April 9th, 2007 at 6:37 pm 
Better look around, because ALL TV news is like this now.]

I disagree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[Holly in Cincinnati Says: </p>
<p>April 9th, 2007 at 6:37 pm<br />
Better look around, because ALL TV news is like this now.]</p>
<p>I disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: White Agent</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-71832</link>
		<dc:creator>White Agent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 02:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/#comment-71832</guid>
		<description>Nobody- Senator Obama is not an &quot;Indonesian&quot;. He is a Born U.S. Citizen. His father was born in Kenya.

Your words-[Obama â€œI never said that I said that If Spain Or Portugal had Madrassas I would be A spaniard or a Portugesse and not a Indonesianâ€?]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody- Senator Obama is not an &#8220;Indonesian&#8221;. He is a Born U.S. Citizen. His father was born in Kenya.</p>
<p>Your words-[Obama â€œI never said that I said that If Spain Or Portugal had Madrassas I would be A spaniard or a Portugesse and not a Indonesianâ€?]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly in Cincinnati</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-71831</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly in Cincinnati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 02:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/#comment-71831</guid>
		<description>Better look around, because ALL TV news is like this now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better look around, because ALL TV news is like this now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: White Agent</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-71829</link>
		<dc:creator>White Agent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 02:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/#comment-71829</guid>
		<description>Good. They are sure to be rigged in favor of the republicans some how anyway. Especially now, since republican voters are a rare commodity. Fox and CBC are bound to pull some kind of shenanigan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good. They are sure to be rigged in favor of the republicans some how anyway. Especially now, since republican voters are a rare commodity. Fox and CBC are bound to pull some kind of shenanigan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaseyL</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-71821</link>
		<dc:creator>CaseyL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 01:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/#comment-71821</guid>
		<description>Fox News isn&#039;t a news station.  It&#039;s a televised version of a tabloid.  Fox doesn&#039;t jsut &quot;skew&quot; news to conform to its viewpoint:  it peddles factual untruths and continued to do so after they&#039;ve been revealed as factual untruths.   

Also, Fox&#039;s &lt;i&gt;stated purpose&lt;/i&gt; is to support the Bush Administration specifically, and the GOP generally.  

Fox News should be relegated to the bottom of the journalistic trash heap.  it should be regarded as no more a news organization than the Weekly Star or Globe - you know, those &quot;newspapers&quot; that are always putting the same alien on the cover and proclaiming that it&#039;s meeting with the President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox News isn&#8217;t a news station.  It&#8217;s a televised version of a tabloid.  Fox doesn&#8217;t jsut &#8220;skew&#8221; news to conform to its viewpoint:  it peddles factual untruths and continued to do so after they&#8217;ve been revealed as factual untruths.   </p>
<p>Also, Fox&#8217;s <i>stated purpose</i> is to support the Bush Administration specifically, and the GOP generally.  </p>
<p>Fox News should be relegated to the bottom of the journalistic trash heap.  it should be regarded as no more a news organization than the Weekly Star or Globe &#8211; you know, those &#8220;newspapers&#8221; that are always putting the same alien on the cover and proclaiming that it&#8217;s meeting with the President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly in Cincinnati</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-71817</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly in Cincinnati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 01:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/#comment-71817</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t watch much TV and don&#039;t get CNN, Fox News or MSNBC. On the rare occasions when I stay in a hotel, I watch all of them and they are equally annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t watch much TV and don&#8217;t get CNN, Fox News or MSNBC. On the rare occasions when I stay in a hotel, I watch all of them and they are equally annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly in Cincinnati</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-71814</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly in Cincinnati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 00:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/#comment-71814</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0407/Hillary_Wont_Do_Fox_Debate_Either.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ben Smith / The Politico: Hillary Won&#039;t Do Fox Debate Either&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0407/Hillary_Wont_Do_Fox_Debate_Either.html" rel="nofollow">Ben Smith / The Politico: Hillary Won&#8217;t Do Fox Debate Either</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elrod</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-71812</link>
		<dc:creator>Elrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 00:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/#comment-71812</guid>
		<description>Good for Obama. Fox News is a propaganda network. It is to the right what the Nation is to the left. The Fox News analysts would spend the whole time denigrating each and every candidate after the debate finished because, well, they hate all the Democrats. Imagine if The Nation hosted a Republican primary debate. Can you imagine the sacrcasm?

But if that&#039;s not reason enough, consider this: Regular Fox News viewers voted for Bush over Kerry by an 88-7 margin. That&#039;s higher than white, evangelical Christians, gun-owners, conservatives, or any other demographic except &quot;Republicans.&quot;  Fox News watchers are not swing voters. They despise the Democratic Party as much as Nation readers despise the Republicans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for Obama. Fox News is a propaganda network. It is to the right what the Nation is to the left. The Fox News analysts would spend the whole time denigrating each and every candidate after the debate finished because, well, they hate all the Democrats. Imagine if The Nation hosted a Republican primary debate. Can you imagine the sacrcasm?</p>
<p>But if that&#8217;s not reason enough, consider this: Regular Fox News viewers voted for Bush over Kerry by an 88-7 margin. That&#8217;s higher than white, evangelical Christians, gun-owners, conservatives, or any other demographic except &#8220;Republicans.&#8221;  Fox News watchers are not swing voters. They despise the Democratic Party as much as Nation readers despise the Republicans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nobody</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-71804</link>
		<dc:creator>Nobody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 00:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/#comment-71804</guid>
		<description>Rile O&#039;Billy &quot;Tell me Senator Obama, What did you take with you from the Madrassa you attended in Portugal that will aid you in being president.&quot;

Obama &quot;Mr. Oreilly I did not nor have I ever been to Portugal.&quot;

Rile O&#039;Billy &quot;So you admit you have been to a Madrassa?&quot;

Obama &quot;I did not say that I said I never been to Portugal.&quot;

Rile O&#039;Billy &quot;But if you had gone to Portugal you would have attended a Madrassa?&quot;

Obama &quot;Perhaps, Perhaps not.  However the point is moot because having never been to Portugal I do not know if they have Madrassas.&quot;

Rile O&#039;Billy &quot;Fair enough.  So tell me senator how is it that you have never been to Portugal?  Do you not like those Spaniards?&quot;

Obama &quot;They are not Spaniards, they are Portugeese.&quot;

Rile O&#039;Billy&quot;Thats what you say.  But how can we trust your judgement in this matter?&quot;

Obama &quot;Because if you are in Spain You do as the Spaniards do.  If in Portugal you do as the Portugeese do.&quot;

Rile O&#039;Billy &quot;So now your admitting you have been to Portugal and in contact with Spaniards?&quot;

Obama &quot;No I said that Had I attended a Madrassa in Portugal I would have become a Portugeese and not a Spaniard.&quot;

Rile O&#039;Billy &quot;So its fair to say that having never been to Portugal that you have never been in a madrassa?

Obama &quot;No I have never been in a Portugeese Madrassa.&quot;

Rile O&#039;Billy&quot;But you have been to Spain?&quot;

Obama &quot;NO I have not been to Spain either.&quot;

Rile O&#039;Billy &#039;So having never been to Portugal or Spain how can either of these countries trust you to look after their interests if your elected president?

Obama &#039;They can&#039;t Because I....&quot;

Rile O&#039;Billy &#039;So you admit that you have no interest in Portugal or Spain because neither one of them have Madrassas?&quot;

Obama &quot;I never said that I said that If Spain Or Portugal had Madrassas I would be A spaniard or a Portugesse and not a Indonesian&quot;

Rile O&#039;Billy &quot;Whats Indonesia have to do with Portugal or Spain?

Obama &#039;Nothing.&quot;

Rile O&#039;Billy &#039;Ill give you the last word Senator.&quot;

Hillary &quot;What about me?  You Never asked me a question&quot;

Rile O&#039;Billy &quot;Have you been to Portugal?&quot;

Hillary &quot;Yes When Bill and I was.....&quot;

Rile O&#039;Billy &quot;So you were in the Portugese Madrassa with Obama?&quot;

Obama &quot;Rile, Hillary and I have never been alone together.&quot;

Rile O&#039;Billy &quot;So you say.  But what say you Mr. President.&quot;

Bill  &quot;Let me repeat I have never ever had sex with that woman.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rile O&#8217;Billy &#8220;Tell me Senator Obama, What did you take with you from the Madrassa you attended in Portugal that will aid you in being president.&#8221;</p>
<p>Obama &#8220;Mr. Oreilly I did not nor have I ever been to Portugal.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rile O&#8217;Billy &#8220;So you admit you have been to a Madrassa?&#8221;</p>
<p>Obama &#8220;I did not say that I said I never been to Portugal.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rile O&#8217;Billy &#8220;But if you had gone to Portugal you would have attended a Madrassa?&#8221;</p>
<p>Obama &#8220;Perhaps, Perhaps not.  However the point is moot because having never been to Portugal I do not know if they have Madrassas.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rile O&#8217;Billy &#8220;Fair enough.  So tell me senator how is it that you have never been to Portugal?  Do you not like those Spaniards?&#8221;</p>
<p>Obama &#8220;They are not Spaniards, they are Portugeese.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rile O&#8217;Billy&#8221;Thats what you say.  But how can we trust your judgement in this matter?&#8221;</p>
<p>Obama &#8220;Because if you are in Spain You do as the Spaniards do.  If in Portugal you do as the Portugeese do.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rile O&#8217;Billy &#8220;So now your admitting you have been to Portugal and in contact with Spaniards?&#8221;</p>
<p>Obama &#8220;No I said that Had I attended a Madrassa in Portugal I would have become a Portugeese and not a Spaniard.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rile O&#8217;Billy &#8220;So its fair to say that having never been to Portugal that you have never been in a madrassa?</p>
<p>Obama &#8220;No I have never been in a Portugeese Madrassa.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rile O&#8217;Billy&#8221;But you have been to Spain?&#8221;</p>
<p>Obama &#8220;NO I have not been to Spain either.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rile O&#8217;Billy &#8216;So having never been to Portugal or Spain how can either of these countries trust you to look after their interests if your elected president?</p>
<p>Obama &#8216;They can&#8217;t Because I&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rile O&#8217;Billy &#8216;So you admit that you have no interest in Portugal or Spain because neither one of them have Madrassas?&#8221;</p>
<p>Obama &#8220;I never said that I said that If Spain Or Portugal had Madrassas I would be A spaniard or a Portugesse and not a Indonesian&#8221;</p>
<p>Rile O&#8217;Billy &#8220;Whats Indonesia have to do with Portugal or Spain?</p>
<p>Obama &#8216;Nothing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rile O&#8217;Billy &#8216;Ill give you the last word Senator.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hillary &#8220;What about me?  You Never asked me a question&#8221;</p>
<p>Rile O&#8217;Billy &#8220;Have you been to Portugal?&#8221;</p>
<p>Hillary &#8220;Yes When Bill and I was&#8230;..&#8221;</p>
<p>Rile O&#8217;Billy &#8220;So you were in the Portugese Madrassa with Obama?&#8221;</p>
<p>Obama &#8220;Rile, Hillary and I have never been alone together.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rile O&#8217;Billy &#8220;So you say.  But what say you Mr. President.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bill  &#8220;Let me repeat I have never ever had sex with that woman.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Satterfield</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-71802</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Satterfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 23:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/#comment-71802</guid>
		<description>Please, SD. Enough. If it suddenly became an RNC talking point that the sky had suddenly turned deep chartreuse Fox would be having &quot;scientists&quot; on to discuss what had caused this strange phenomenon even as everyone else in the world was noting that it still looked the same to them. That&#039;s what Fox is, not simply a network that &quot;leans&quot; towards the right but a semi-official party mouthpiece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, SD. Enough. If it suddenly became an RNC talking point that the sky had suddenly turned deep chartreuse Fox would be having &#8220;scientists&#8221; on to discuss what had caused this strange phenomenon even as everyone else in the world was noting that it still looked the same to them. That&#8217;s what Fox is, not simply a network that &#8220;leans&#8221; towards the right but a semi-official party mouthpiece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Proud Liberal</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-71794</link>
		<dc:creator>Proud Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 23:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/#comment-71794</guid>
		<description>sorry about the abbreviated post, but what I was saying is that the other networks aren&#039;t actively engaging in propaganda for one side or the other.  They may have a bias one way or the other from time to time, but that is not what Fox is all about. Fox is propaganda. Everything. EVERYTHING is presented in a way to assist Republicans and damage Democrats. Why would any Democrat assist them? Time to call a spade a spade.  Fox has a right to be out there, but they don&#039;t have a right to be considered &quot;fair and balanced&quot;, that will be decided by the viewers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry about the abbreviated post, but what I was saying is that the other networks aren&#8217;t actively engaging in propaganda for one side or the other.  They may have a bias one way or the other from time to time, but that is not what Fox is all about. Fox is propaganda. Everything. EVERYTHING is presented in a way to assist Republicans and damage Democrats. Why would any Democrat assist them? Time to call a spade a spade.  Fox has a right to be out there, but they don&#8217;t have a right to be considered &#8220;fair and balanced&#8221;, that will be decided by the viewers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Proud Liberal</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-71793</link>
		<dc:creator>Proud Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 23:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/2008-elections/12071/obama-will-not-partake-in-foxcbc-debate/#comment-71793</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;All of the other networks are considered to lean toward the Democrats. Yet, during elections, those networks participate in Republican primaries. I would expect the same from Obama or Edwards.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
Bull feathers.  None of the other networks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>All of the other networks are considered to lean toward the Democrats. Yet, during elections, those networks participate in Republican primaries. I would expect the same from Obama or Edwards.</p></blockquote>
<p>Bull feathers.  None of the other networks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

