An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right

Seymour Hersh on Iranian Radio

Pajamas Media links to the transcript of an interview The New Yorker’s Seymour Hersh gave to the Islamic Republic of Iran radio. Excerpt:

Question: As our supreme leader, Ayatollah Khamenei has stated in case of any attack upon us we have got the right to retaliate against American interests and bases at any place of our choice. So doesn’t US administration fear about targeting its bases around our country and its establishments or killing its forces and etc?

Answer: You know I can just tell you it should and again as I wrote in the New Yorker magazine we are doing more than targeting Iran where inside your country. There are a lot of aggressive activities by the United States. I think we and the Israelis, I have written this, have contacts with Baluchis and the Iranian Kurds all of whom in some cases are happy with the government or in opposition to the government and we are also setting our troops across the border. So there is a lot of aggression by the United States right now on Iran and what happens next nobody knows. So far, Iran has been very quiet.

Question: Most international analysts believe that the US ultimate goal is to fight against revolutionary Islam and to dominate of the region’s energy and oil. But Mr. Jimmy Carter stated that the overthrow of Saddam did not have anything do with energy and oil. So what is the real goal of the US administration in the Middle East?

Answer: Nobody knows what is in the president mind and Mr. Cheney. We don’t know what they think. He attacked Iraq in 2003 in response to the Sunni Al- Qaeda in America. Why he would attack Iraq have never been clear because Saddam Hussein was secular. He was a Sunni but he did not like Jihadists. So it is unclear to me what Bush was doing. You could argue that the neo-cons want to get rid of any threat. They never liked Saddam. He was a threat to the other countries in the Middle East, to Israel. Perhaps what we are doing is for Israel and oil but I don’t think this president believes that he really thinks his mission is to spread democracy in the Middle East, even though, you could argue that Iran is probably the most democratic country. The elections there certainly indicate people vote what the way they believe but he believes to spreading democracy and right now we are working with some of the most undemocratic countries in the Middle East, you know Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia that do so. It is very strange.

Hersh is going to be slaughtered by conservatives over this and, to a degree, rightfully so, I’d say. He is a journalist not a politicians, so he does not have the responsibility to act in the best interest of the United States of America as such: he has the responsibility to find out what’s going on and share this with the public.

However, voluntarily helping the Mullahs to spread their anti-American propaganda is not exactly necessary either. The Mullahs and Ahmadinejad are probably willing to throw a party for Hersh for insinuating that it might all be part of an American-Israeli conspiracy. Something like their wildest dream coming true: an American journalist implying that Iran is the victim of some Zionist plot.

With the most democratic, Hersh probably means that Iranians are free to vote for whomever they want, as long as it is for moderate extremists or extreme extremists, since all true opposition in Iran is oppressed.

Dialogue is good, but a little bit more critical attitude towards the Iranian regime would have been welcome. As a journalist, Hersh should also have pointed out that the Mullahs aren’t exactly the world’s most sympathetic figures either, and that the international community isn’t happy with Iran’s nuclear program, not just America. If that would have meant that they wouldn’t have interviewed him, so be it. Journalistic integrity requires it.

Also at Pajamas Media itself is this interesting article about Iranian general Asgari who is reported to have defected. The only problem? No one knows for sure, or, at least, those who might know, aren’t talking. Did Asgari defect? Was he kidnapped? And, did he ever arrive in Istanbul in the first place?



5 Responses to “Seymour Hersh on Iranian Radio”

  1. Davebo says:

    Is it just me or does invoking “journalistic integrity” in a piece linking to Pajama’s Media evoke the image of naivety?

    Oops, it’s Mikey.

    Never mind.

  2. White Agent says:

    One thing about Europe though, nobody cares what conservatives think or say.

  3. Chris says:

    The most revered journalists are those who question those in power. Hersh is questioning those in power in the United States. He shouldn’t have to apologize for that. And I don’t see how he is a mouthpiece for Iran in this article.

  4. Kevin H says:
    The elections there certainly indicate people vote what the way they believe but he believes to spreading democracy and right now we are working with some of the most undemocratic countries in the Middle East, you know Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia that do so.


    With the most democratic, Hersh probably means that Iranians are free to vote for whomever they want, as long as it is for moderate extremists or extreme extremists, since all true opposition in Iran is oppressed.

    I think he is just pointing out that if all we cared about was simply Democracy we would be on Iran’s side trying to pressure Saudi Arabia into democratic reforms if anything, not the other way around.

    I think it’s clear that Democracy was really a tactic for this administration, not a goal as was stated to the world. Again, the administrations simplified rhetoric has created more troubles in the world than it prevented. The truth of the matter unfortunately seems to support Iran’s propaganda in this instance; the US acted in Iraq with it’s own interests and the interests of it’s close ally Israel in mind. Of course this doesn’t mean that Iran should get a nuke. Maybe it’s support for the idea that honesty is the best policy, even foreign policy.

  5. Wisdo says:

    On several rightwing american websites there have been death threats against Mr. Hersch.

    Typically the accusation is that speaking on Iranian radio of military matters is treasonous becuase, and I quote “they are the enemy and we are at war”.

    It seems most conservative believe what Mister Hersch has been saying, that the USA has already begun hostilies against Iran – despite the fact that they constantly refute this.

    Whether it is true or not, another war of agression by the USA against a country in the middle east which poses no threat to them will be seen by many as a racist war, or a war of imperial conquest. I would expect this to have an extremely negative impact on US trade in the short and long term.

© 2003-2011 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Mode Equity