<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Defense Of Negativity In Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/12057/in-defense-of-negativity-in-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/12057/in-defense-of-negativity-in-politics/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:29:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jwest</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/12057/in-defense-of-negativity-in-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-71589</link>
		<dc:creator>jwest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 15:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/12057/in-defense-of-negativity-in-politics/#comment-71589</guid>
		<description>No one that Iâ€™ve ever heard has argued against negativism as described by Prof. Geer.

He outlines how it should be.  If there is a situation or policy you disagree with, describe in negative terms the things you believe are wrong with that policy.  However, he goes on to say you should then propose a solution policy and outline why your approach would solve the negative things the original policy did wrong.

This is what the leftâ€™s negativism has lacked throughout the past 6 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one that Iâ€™ve ever heard has argued against negativism as described by Prof. Geer.</p>
<p>He outlines how it should be.  If there is a situation or policy you disagree with, describe in negative terms the things you believe are wrong with that policy.  However, he goes on to say you should then propose a solution policy and outline why your approach would solve the negative things the original policy did wrong.</p>
<p>This is what the leftâ€™s negativism has lacked throughout the past 6 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grognard</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/12057/in-defense-of-negativity-in-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-71546</link>
		<dc:creator>grognard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 12:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/12057/in-defense-of-negativity-in-politics/#comment-71546</guid>
		<description>It depends on how you define negativity. Being critical of a policy and pointing out reservations or adverse consequences is fine. Coming out against a policy by  hurling insults at the author is juvenile. What he needed to make clear is that we need  â€œadultâ€? negativity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It depends on how you define negativity. Being critical of a policy and pointing out reservations or adverse consequences is fine. Coming out against a policy by  hurling insults at the author is juvenile. What he needed to make clear is that we need  â€œadultâ€? negativity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
