
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Accuracy, Schmaccuracy&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/11991/accuracy-schmaccuracy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/11991/accuracy-schmaccuracy/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 20:45:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kritter</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/11991/accuracy-schmaccuracy/comment-page-1/#comment-70781</link>
		<dc:creator>kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 19:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/law-legal-matters/11991/accuracy-schmaccuracy/#comment-70781</guid>
		<description>WA- I am not a Republican, but I don&#039;t lump them all in the same boat either- the party as a whole has moved in a direction that I don&#039;t think benefits the majority of Americans., but that doesn&#039;t mean that I will condemn all of them. I don&#039;t like it when the far right condemns everything the Democrats do, so why should I follow their bad example?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WA- I am not a Republican, but I don&#8217;t lump them all in the same boat either- the party as a whole has moved in a direction that I don&#8217;t think benefits the majority of Americans., but that doesn&#8217;t mean that I will condemn all of them. I don&#8217;t like it when the far right condemns everything the Democrats do, so why should I follow their bad example?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: White Agent</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/11991/accuracy-schmaccuracy/comment-page-1/#comment-70730</link>
		<dc:creator>White Agent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 17:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/law-legal-matters/11991/accuracy-schmaccuracy/#comment-70730</guid>
		<description>What do you expect? The man is a republican.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you expect? The man is a republican.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kritter</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/11991/accuracy-schmaccuracy/comment-page-1/#comment-70641</link>
		<dc:creator>kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 13:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/society/law-legal-matters/11991/accuracy-schmaccuracy/#comment-70641</guid>
		<description>It is truly sad that we live in an age where politicians can pretty much make up the facts as they go along, carelessly ruining the good reputations of others, and rarely be held accountable. Yes, Hatch is innately a politician, but he is also a leader whose words are held with more regard than an average person. In that respect, he should have been more responsible in his remarks about Lam. His initial comments will have much more of an impact than his barely noticeable retraction. Is that the way he intended it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is truly sad that we live in an age where politicians can pretty much make up the facts as they go along, carelessly ruining the good reputations of others, and rarely be held accountable. Yes, Hatch is innately a politician, but he is also a leader whose words are held with more regard than an average person. In that respect, he should have been more responsible in his remarks about Lam. His initial comments will have much more of an impact than his barely noticeable retraction. Is that the way he intended it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

