<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could Fred Thompson Really Get The Republican Presidential Nomination? (UPDATED)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/11789/could-fred-thompson-really-get-the-republican-presidential-nomination/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/11789/could-fred-thompson-really-get-the-republican-presidential-nomination/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:28:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Satterfield</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/11789/could-fred-thompson-really-get-the-republican-presidential-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-68460</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Satterfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 03:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/11789/could-fred-thompson-really-get-the-republican-presidential-nomination/#comment-68460</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s another &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2162844/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;opinion piece&lt;/a&gt; on Thompson as GOP candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2162844/" rel="nofollow">opinion piece</a> on Thompson as GOP candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pacatrue</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/11789/could-fred-thompson-really-get-the-republican-presidential-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-68385</link>
		<dc:creator>pacatrue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/11789/could-fred-thompson-really-get-the-republican-presidential-nomination/#comment-68385</guid>
		<description>Thompson actually went through some important family issues around the time he decided to retire from the Senate. I am blanking on what exactly they were, sorry, but they were significant. I have no problem with a man in his 50s spending time with his family and working a fairly comfie job for a bit. When Washington and Jefferson retired to their estates to farm and write letters and just hang out, we all celebrate their embrace of private life and escape from Washington. When Thompson does it, apparently it shows he&#039;s abandoning others?

For people who take the above incorrectly, I will not be voting for Thompson because I disagree with his policies. I think they are wrong. This doesn&#039;t mean I have to condemn him for irrelevant junk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thompson actually went through some important family issues around the time he decided to retire from the Senate. I am blanking on what exactly they were, sorry, but they were significant. I have no problem with a man in his 50s spending time with his family and working a fairly comfie job for a bit. When Washington and Jefferson retired to their estates to farm and write letters and just hang out, we all celebrate their embrace of private life and escape from Washington. When Thompson does it, apparently it shows he&#8217;s abandoning others?</p>
<p>For people who take the above incorrectly, I will not be voting for Thompson because I disagree with his policies. I think they are wrong. This doesn&#8217;t mean I have to condemn him for irrelevant junk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/11789/could-fred-thompson-really-get-the-republican-presidential-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-68366</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/11789/could-fred-thompson-really-get-the-republican-presidential-nomination/#comment-68366</guid>
		<description>I still say he&#039;s been relatively inactive during these last, incredibly tumultous years.   Alito and Roberts are nice, and being on an adivsory group is respectable, but he seems to have largely gotten out of politics, elected politics, when things got ugly.    Not saying he jumped ship or anything because he couldn&#039;t hack it, but he just hasn&#039;t been thru the worst of the giant sh*tstorm that is the Bush administration.  Probably why he smells the nicest to a lot of folks at this time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still say he&#8217;s been relatively inactive during these last, incredibly tumultous years.   Alito and Roberts are nice, and being on an adivsory group is respectable, but he seems to have largely gotten out of politics, elected politics, when things got ugly.    Not saying he jumped ship or anything because he couldn&#8217;t hack it, but he just hasn&#8217;t been thru the worst of the giant sh*tstorm that is the Bush administration.  Probably why he smells the nicest to a lot of folks at this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FredThompsonTruth</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/11789/could-fred-thompson-really-get-the-republican-presidential-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-68347</link>
		<dc:creator>FredThompsonTruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/11789/could-fred-thompson-really-get-the-republican-presidential-nomination/#comment-68347</guid>
		<description>Beansox nailed pecisely ZERO.

He has spant years a a real Federal prosecutor,  Including co-Chief counsel to watergate that broke open the tapes inthe oval office.

Broke open a &quot;Pardons for Sale&quot; that brought down a governor.

Has maintained a law practice all those yearas a well.

So much for your ignorant &quot;Just an Actor&quot; approach.

The past 6 years doing nothing?

Try another Lie beano.

First off, let me remind you that 6 years ago he was a sitting SENATOR, with another year to run in his term.

More recently, he was the point man for getting Cheif Justice Roberts through the Senate.

Assisted in getting Alito thru there too.

And he is currerently on a government foreign policy advisory group, at the request of Sec of State Rice.  He is up to date onthe growing threats in places like the Phillipines, the Spratleys, Thailand and other places that aren&#039;t even on the radar yet - places where small supportive actions can preclude later larger wars.

Has been involved in the Americn Enterprise Institute.

OK - I accept your apologies for being a liar Beansox and Psycheout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beansox nailed pecisely ZERO.</p>
<p>He has spant years a a real Federal prosecutor,  Including co-Chief counsel to watergate that broke open the tapes inthe oval office.</p>
<p>Broke open a &#8220;Pardons for Sale&#8221; that brought down a governor.</p>
<p>Has maintained a law practice all those yearas a well.</p>
<p>So much for your ignorant &#8220;Just an Actor&#8221; approach.</p>
<p>The past 6 years doing nothing?</p>
<p>Try another Lie beano.</p>
<p>First off, let me remind you that 6 years ago he was a sitting SENATOR, with another year to run in his term.</p>
<p>More recently, he was the point man for getting Cheif Justice Roberts through the Senate.</p>
<p>Assisted in getting Alito thru there too.</p>
<p>And he is currerently on a government foreign policy advisory group, at the request of Sec of State Rice.  He is up to date onthe growing threats in places like the Phillipines, the Spratleys, Thailand and other places that aren&#8217;t even on the radar yet &#8211; places where small supportive actions can preclude later larger wars.</p>
<p>Has been involved in the Americn Enterprise Institute.</p>
<p>OK &#8211; I accept your apologies for being a liar Beansox and Psycheout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psycheout</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/11789/could-fred-thompson-really-get-the-republican-presidential-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-68309</link>
		<dc:creator>Psycheout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/11789/could-fred-thompson-really-get-the-republican-presidential-nomination/#comment-68309</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know.  There&#039;s plenty of &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs4brownback.wordpress.com/2007/03/29/actor-for-president-open-thread/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;other actors&lt;/a&gt; to consider for the role of President.

I think the Fred Thompson fanboys are swooning because he&#039;s an actor who &lt;em&gt;looks&lt;/em&gt; presidential.  That&#039;s not enough.

Beansox nails it.  Well done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know.  There&#8217;s plenty of <a href="http://blogs4brownback.wordpress.com/2007/03/29/actor-for-president-open-thread/" rel="nofollow">other actors</a> to consider for the role of President.</p>
<p>I think the Fred Thompson fanboys are swooning because he&#8217;s an actor who <em>looks</em> presidential.  That&#8217;s not enough.</p>
<p>Beansox nails it.  Well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beansox</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/11789/could-fred-thompson-really-get-the-republican-presidential-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-68291</link>
		<dc:creator>Beansox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/11789/could-fred-thompson-really-get-the-republican-presidential-nomination/#comment-68291</guid>
		<description>Where the hell has he been for the last six years while the GOP has taken it from all sides? Ohhh thats right...hes been out in Hollywood with his wife young enough to be his daughter attending uber liberal hollywood elitist parties with those that have waged a viscious war against the very party he now wants a nomination from!!!

Meanwhile all the others wanting the nomination have been right there in the trenches with us fighting the good fight! But not Fred...no...he was too busy attending Oscar parties and play acting on television to be bothered with it all!


Get real. I will not vote for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where the hell has he been for the last six years while the GOP has taken it from all sides? Ohhh thats right&#8230;hes been out in Hollywood with his wife young enough to be his daughter attending uber liberal hollywood elitist parties with those that have waged a viscious war against the very party he now wants a nomination from!!!</p>
<p>Meanwhile all the others wanting the nomination have been right there in the trenches with us fighting the good fight! But not Fred&#8230;no&#8230;he was too busy attending Oscar parties and play acting on television to be bothered with it all!</p>
<p>Get real. I will not vote for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonidas</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/11789/could-fred-thompson-really-get-the-republican-presidential-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-68178</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonidas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/11789/could-fred-thompson-really-get-the-republican-presidential-nomination/#comment-68178</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZjRiN2NiZGIzODQ0MDc5MGUxYTFhOWY5NTY2MzEyMDU=&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Fred Thompson kinds sounds like George W. Bush in this piece.&lt;/a&gt;

Taking about the stripping away of traditional presidential powers. Um...Earth to Fred, the Executive has been stripping powers from the legislative and the judiciary pretty heavily lately.

Look at some of his statements in that article:

&quot;hapless Justice Department&quot;

&quot;The Democrats vow congressional hearings to determine if (if you can imagine this) politics were involved&quot;
&quot;Considering the times we live in, do we really want to continue to try to chip away at the traditional powers of the president? Regardless of who wins the White House, donâ€™t we need a strong president?&quot;

and my personal favorite:

&quot;In 1993 Attorney General Janet Reno rode into town and fired every U.S. attorney in the country but one-all Republican appointees.&quot;


I&#039;m sorry but as ever since I could vote I&#039;ve been a member of the Republican Party, and the party I joined didn&#039;t depend on the actions of the Democrats to justify their behavior.  Back then Republicans held themselves accountable to their own standards and didn&#039;t need to whine about Democrats doing it first to justify a questionable practive.

Thats why I can&#039;t support the GOP much anymore, I&#039;ve always been a moderate, but the GOP had always seemed to have more integrity and small government appealed to my libertarian side and my sense of personal responsibility. 

Fred Thompson looks just like George Bush here, denial of wrong doing, blaming the opposition, down playing and aguing for dropping an investigation of what could be not only partisanship, but also against the law, making an appeal for the current level or even more of executive power, and to top it off jumping on the &quot;Clinton did it first WAAAAMBULANCE&quot;.  We don&#039;t need more years of this type of irresponsible attitude.  Thumbs down to Fred.  Ron Paul is looking better and better to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZjRiN2NiZGIzODQ0MDc5MGUxYTFhOWY5NTY2MzEyMDU=" rel="nofollow"> Fred Thompson kinds sounds like George W. Bush in this piece.</a></p>
<p>Taking about the stripping away of traditional presidential powers. Um&#8230;Earth to Fred, the Executive has been stripping powers from the legislative and the judiciary pretty heavily lately.</p>
<p>Look at some of his statements in that article:</p>
<p>&#8220;hapless Justice Department&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The Democrats vow congressional hearings to determine if (if you can imagine this) politics were involved&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Considering the times we live in, do we really want to continue to try to chip away at the traditional powers of the president? Regardless of who wins the White House, donâ€™t we need a strong president?&#8221;</p>
<p>and my personal favorite:</p>
<p>&#8220;In 1993 Attorney General Janet Reno rode into town and fired every U.S. attorney in the country but one-all Republican appointees.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry but as ever since I could vote I&#8217;ve been a member of the Republican Party, and the party I joined didn&#8217;t depend on the actions of the Democrats to justify their behavior.  Back then Republicans held themselves accountable to their own standards and didn&#8217;t need to whine about Democrats doing it first to justify a questionable practive.</p>
<p>Thats why I can&#8217;t support the GOP much anymore, I&#8217;ve always been a moderate, but the GOP had always seemed to have more integrity and small government appealed to my libertarian side and my sense of personal responsibility. </p>
<p>Fred Thompson looks just like George Bush here, denial of wrong doing, blaming the opposition, down playing and aguing for dropping an investigation of what could be not only partisanship, but also against the law, making an appeal for the current level or even more of executive power, and to top it off jumping on the &#8220;Clinton did it first WAAAAMBULANCE&#8221;.  We don&#8217;t need more years of this type of irresponsible attitude.  Thumbs down to Fred.  Ron Paul is looking better and better to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pastor Dan</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/11789/could-fred-thompson-really-get-the-republican-presidential-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-68171</link>
		<dc:creator>Pastor Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/general/11789/could-fred-thompson-really-get-the-republican-presidential-nomination/#comment-68171</guid>
		<description>In a word, yes.  FDT is for real.  Perot was attractive to many because of his highly unorthodox pledge to use his own money for his campaign, and because he was so ready to point out the shortcomings and hypocrisy in both of the major parties.  Most of us look back now and ask if he wasn&#039;t a little off his rocker.  I don&#039;t think anyone&#039;s likely to say that about Fred Thompson.  And as for Reagan having been a party workhorse, read up on Thompson, from Watergate to the Roberts confirmation.  His experience is vast, and his positions are steadfast.  He is a true conservative, though perhaps not quite so much as Newt, but it appears he is far more electable than Newt, and may have a steadier moral compass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a word, yes.  FDT is for real.  Perot was attractive to many because of his highly unorthodox pledge to use his own money for his campaign, and because he was so ready to point out the shortcomings and hypocrisy in both of the major parties.  Most of us look back now and ask if he wasn&#8217;t a little off his rocker.  I don&#8217;t think anyone&#8217;s likely to say that about Fred Thompson.  And as for Reagan having been a party workhorse, read up on Thompson, from Watergate to the Roberts confirmation.  His experience is vast, and his positions are steadfast.  He is a true conservative, though perhaps not quite so much as Newt, but it appears he is far more electable than Newt, and may have a steadier moral compass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

