End Run Earmarks
The New York Times points out the craftiness of our legislators in Earmark Lives, but Dares Not Speak Its Name
…But Republicans, who dispensed earmarks with relish until they lost control of the committee last November, are accusing the Democrats of larding up the bill to win members’ support.
“Welcome Kmart shoppers,� said Representative Harold Rogers, Republican of Kentucky. “This is the shopping mart for those who are nervous about supporting the precipitous withdrawal of troops. This is an effort to buy votes. Whether you are a spinach farmer or salmon farmer, there’s something in here for you.�
Among other changes to the president’s initial request for $103 billion, the committee tacked on $3 billion in relief measures for the Gulf Coast, $3.7 billion in agricultural assistance, $500 million to fight wildfires and $60 million for Pacific Coast fisheries.
…It was impossible to know who proposed most of the measures.
I believe that some earmarks are appropriate for the overall well being of citizens and the economy. But they should be discussed in open deliberation as part of the overall priorities of our tax dollars. Using these funds merely to buy votes is disrespectful of us taxpapers and is inefficient fiscal management.
I would support some formula to distribute money in some fair proportion to the population in a Congressperson’s district to the extent that those funds are a prudent investment in our wellbeing and competitiveness.
One reason I tend not to identify only with one party is that power is corrupting; and while the new boss may pander to the reformers who helped them gain power it is only a matter of time that special interests will press for their share of the booty.
I hope that the GOP evolves into a credible force for the efficient management of government operations and more competitive, publicly financed, elections increasingly free of special interest influence. If for no other reason than becoming and promoting a viable alternative to the inevitable decline of those in power.
Perhaps the new moderate Republican Leadership Council can lead this evolution.
3 Responses to “End Run Earmarks”
Earmarks is a topic everyone in Washington talks about, but nothing ever seems to change. It’s as if the legislators lived in a separate universe, focused on being re-elected instead of legislating policies for the nation.
Yeah, earmarks suck, no matter who does them.
A question though: When budget numbers are calculated and published detailing how much was spent on defense, are these earmarks included in the defense numbers? Same with other parts of the budget. Defense is a popular item to tack things onto, but I wonder if non-defense items are included as part of overall defense spending.
A real line-item veto is long overdue.