<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 7 Dirty Words You Can Sometimes Read On Blogs (UPDATED)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/11239/7-dirty-words-you-can-sometimes-read-on-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/11239/7-dirty-words-you-can-sometimes-read-on-blogs/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:57:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: harperbruce</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/11239/7-dirty-words-you-can-sometimes-read-on-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-56517</link>
		<dc:creator>harperbruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 06:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/blogging/7-dirty-words-you-can-sometimes-read-on-blogs/#comment-56517</guid>
		<description>A tricky thing, dependent (as you note) on personal standards of what&#039;s vulgar.  At the risk of getting this comment edited (grin), I&#039;ll use a rare &quot;hell&quot; or &quot;damn&quot; in an article on the Mews (frankly, the kids I went to school with in the 60s and 70s cursed far worse); but &lt;em&gt;never&lt;/em&gt; any more than that.  And I also police the comments left to keep that kind of thing out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A tricky thing, dependent (as you note) on personal standards of what&#8217;s vulgar.  At the risk of getting this comment edited (grin), I&#8217;ll use a rare &#8220;hell&#8221; or &#8220;damn&#8221; in an article on the Mews (frankly, the kids I went to school with in the 60s and 70s cursed far worse); but <em>never</em> any more than that.  And I also police the comments left to keep that kind of thing out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael van der Galien</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/11239/7-dirty-words-you-can-sometimes-read-on-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-56265</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael van der Galien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 15:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/blogging/7-dirty-words-you-can-sometimes-read-on-blogs/#comment-56265</guid>
		<description>In 99% of the cases, &#039;dirty words&#039; don&#039;t add anything. There are circumstances in which they do, but those are very exceptional. 

In personal conversations I swear, but in blogposts not. It brings down the quality of the site imo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 99% of the cases, &#8216;dirty words&#8217; don&#8217;t add anything. There are circumstances in which they do, but those are very exceptional. </p>
<p>In personal conversations I swear, but in blogposts not. It brings down the quality of the site imo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tully</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/11239/7-dirty-words-you-can-sometimes-read-on-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-56257</link>
		<dc:creator>Tully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 15:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media/blogging/7-dirty-words-you-can-sometimes-read-on-blogs/#comment-56257</guid>
		<description>It wasn&#039;t exactly a scientific survey that Patrick Ishmael did at &lt;a href=&quot;http://newsbuckit.blogspot.com/2007/02/seven-words-you-can-never-say-on.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;News Buckit&lt;/a&gt;. There&#039;s WAY too many holes in his survey approach to take it as evidence of anything. I think the overall conclusion (left blogs being more inclined to foul langauge than right blogs) is true, but what that means is your own mileage.

&lt;em&gt;early on I made a decision that this site would use daily newspaper and broadcast standards in terms of language â€” not cable TV or comedy club standards&lt;/em&gt;.

I agree, and applaud, and thank you for it. Used very occasionally, such langauge can have some utility. Used as barrage and/or bombardment, it simply indicates a lack of maturity and accomanying lack of linguistic skills on the part of the bombardier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t exactly a scientific survey that Patrick Ishmael did at <a href="http://newsbuckit.blogspot.com/2007/02/seven-words-you-can-never-say-on.html" rel="nofollow">News Buckit</a>. There&#8217;s WAY too many holes in his survey approach to take it as evidence of anything. I think the overall conclusion (left blogs being more inclined to foul langauge than right blogs) is true, but what that means is your own mileage.</p>
<p><em>early on I made a decision that this site would use daily newspaper and broadcast standards in terms of language â€” not cable TV or comedy club standards</em>.</p>
<p>I agree, and applaud, and thank you for it. Used very occasionally, such langauge can have some utility. Used as barrage and/or bombardment, it simply indicates a lack of maturity and accomanying lack of linguistic skills on the part of the bombardier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
