Let’s take Angelina Jolie seriously for a moment, shall we? She had an interesting (and important) piece in yesterday’s Washington Post on the situation in Darfur — from a refugee camp (Oure Cassoni) in Bahai, Chad. Here are a few key passages:
– “By every measure — killings, rapes, the burning and looting of villages — the violence in Darfur has increased since my last visit, in 2004. The death toll has passed 200,000; in four years of fighting, Janjaweed militia members have driven 2.5 million people from their homes, including the 26,000 refugees crowded into Oure Cassoni.”
– “When I was in Chad in June 2004, refugees told me about systematic attacks on their villages. It was estimated then that more than 1,000 people were dying each week. In October 2004 I visited West Darfur, where I heard horrific stories, including accounts of gang-rapes of mothers and their children. By that time, the UNHCR estimated, 1.6 million people had been displaced in the three provinces of Darfur and 200,000 others had fled to Chad.”
– “Until the killers and their sponsors are prosecuted and punished, violence will continue on a massive scale. Ending it may well require military action. But accountability can also come from international tribunals, measuring the perpetrators against international standards of justice.”
Angelina does not back away from military intervention — and I tend to think that only military intervention by NATO (and not just the U.N. and/or the A.U. would have any chance of halting the genocide and securing Darfur and Chad — but she is right that “there will be no enduring peace without justice”. And this means that an empowered International Criminal Court can be an effective vehicle in bringing some semblance of justice to the region, investigating the many criminal acts and prosecuting the perpetrators of the horror. But the ICC will only be “as strong as the support we give it”. With military action unlikely, there is no good reason not to empower the ICC.
“This might be the moment we stop the cycle of violence and end our tolerance for crimes against humanity. What the worst people in the world fear most is justice. That’s what we should deliver.”
Powerful words backed up by first-hand experience of what many of us in the comfort of our prosperous liberal democracies would rather pretend isn’t happening.
Whatever else one can say about Angelina Jolie, she’s emerged as a significant public figure in the fight for justice.
I wonder if Ms. Jolie in calling for NATO action without the approval of the United Nations could be considering for calling for war crimes.
The United Nations would have to be in change to prevent the cries of War Crimes. I also wonder how Ms. Jolie reconciles her opposition to Iraq with the crimes for invading the Sudan?
I also noticed that the national interest of the United States was not mentioned in the call for action. Doesn’t this violate the current policy proposed by the Democratic Party?
Darfur is a huge problem in terms of what can be done.
China supports the Sudanese government at the UN. (Why don’t we ever complain about China while we bash every other country?)
Our NATO partbers are hard to count on, as we see in Afghanistan.
What else is there?
Darfur is just an extention of the second sudanese civil war. The US, Uganda, Ethiopia and Eretrea backed southern region (which is seeking partition) is supporting rebels in darfur known as Sudan Liberation Movement (SLM) & the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM). They are also supporting the estern region of sudan as well. All three regions are pushing for partion from the central government of khartoum. So this conflict is very complex.