<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rape of the Seas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/11024/rape-of-the-seas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/11024/rape-of-the-seas/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 03:40:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bellisaurius</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/11024/rape-of-the-seas/comment-page-1/#comment-54114</link>
		<dc:creator>bellisaurius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 07:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/business/rape-of-the-seas/#comment-54114</guid>
		<description>Swaraaj, 

I like the article, but the headline seems to be a bit tough (although it may be true, and I&#039;m not focusing on the wrod rape, but more the shock value). It really distracts from your piece. A little sarcasm, or something a little melodramatic&#039;s OK, but the headline on a site calling itself moderate is a bit disorienting. I would hope you guys don&#039;t go the Limbaugh route.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Swaraaj, </p>
<p>I like the article, but the headline seems to be a bit tough (although it may be true, and I&#8217;m not focusing on the wrod rape, but more the shock value). It really distracts from your piece. A little sarcasm, or something a little melodramatic&#8217;s OK, but the headline on a site calling itself moderate is a bit disorienting. I would hope you guys don&#8217;t go the Limbaugh route.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/11024/rape-of-the-seas/comment-page-1/#comment-54061</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/business/rape-of-the-seas/#comment-54061</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s been nearly 10,000 years since the neolithic revolution and hunting/gathering in the form of commercial fishing still forms a major portion of the food production of our species.  Unfortunately, at the present state of the art aquaculture has a long way to go and isn&#039;t really an acceptable substitute for fishing.

There are two different problems.  First, aquaculture exacts a rather heavy environmental toll.  Check out what&#039;s going on in Ecuador and Brazil in that regard.  Second, in terms of fish farming most commercially farmed species are carnivores and it takes more protein in the form of wild fish to feed the fisheries than the fisheries produce.  The more aquaculture, the faster wild stocks are depleted.  Both of these may change but that&#039;s the way it is now.

Major fishing nations, as noted above, include Japan, Spain, and South Korea.  For reasons not entirely clear to me other countries with enormous fleets, notably Belize, China, and Chile weren&#039;t mentioned.  According to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fao.org/fi&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;UN&#039;s relevant agency&lt;/a&gt; more than three-quarters of the total tonnage of fish caught are destined for Asia and Asian countries don&#039;t have a lot of ready substitutes for wild fish as a protein source for their people.

Commercial fishing is a practically perfect instance of the &#147;Tragedy of the Commons&#148; and solutions which take that into account are probably the most likely to succeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been nearly 10,000 years since the neolithic revolution and hunting/gathering in the form of commercial fishing still forms a major portion of the food production of our species.  Unfortunately, at the present state of the art aquaculture has a long way to go and isn&#8217;t really an acceptable substitute for fishing.</p>
<p>There are two different problems.  First, aquaculture exacts a rather heavy environmental toll.  Check out what&#8217;s going on in Ecuador and Brazil in that regard.  Second, in terms of fish farming most commercially farmed species are carnivores and it takes more protein in the form of wild fish to feed the fisheries than the fisheries produce.  The more aquaculture, the faster wild stocks are depleted.  Both of these may change but that&#8217;s the way it is now.</p>
<p>Major fishing nations, as noted above, include Japan, Spain, and South Korea.  For reasons not entirely clear to me other countries with enormous fleets, notably Belize, China, and Chile weren&#8217;t mentioned.  According to the <a href="http://www.fao.org/fi" rel="nofollow">UN&#8217;s relevant agency</a> more than three-quarters of the total tonnage of fish caught are destined for Asia and Asian countries don&#8217;t have a lot of ready substitutes for wild fish as a protein source for their people.</p>
<p>Commercial fishing is a practically perfect instance of the &#8220;Tragedy of the Commons&#8221; and solutions which take that into account are probably the most likely to succeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Satterfield</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/11024/rape-of-the-seas/comment-page-1/#comment-54030</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Satterfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/business/rape-of-the-seas/#comment-54030</guid>
		<description>Sam,

They are regulated in most places but as the article pointed out, if the countries that are subsidizing their fishing fleets would just stop that practice and ban certain forms of fishing that catch many non-foodstock fish in their nets and also damage the environment it would be a major step forward. I also think we are going to be forced to develop aquaculture both for the direct harvesting of food and to try and repopulate depleted species. This is a very serious problem that far too few people know about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam,</p>
<p>They are regulated in most places but as the article pointed out, if the countries that are subsidizing their fishing fleets would just stop that practice and ban certain forms of fishing that catch many non-foodstock fish in their nets and also damage the environment it would be a major step forward. I also think we are going to be forced to develop aquaculture both for the direct harvesting of food and to try and repopulate depleted species. This is a very serious problem that far too few people know about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/11024/rape-of-the-seas/comment-page-1/#comment-54010</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/business/rape-of-the-seas/#comment-54010</guid>
		<description>Whose got the authority to do anything about this?  Is the fishing industry just that unregulated they can go about annihilating the fisheries of the world?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whose got the authority to do anything about this?  Is the fishing industry just that unregulated they can go about annihilating the fisheries of the world?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: University Update</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/11024/rape-of-the-seas/comment-page-1/#comment-54006</link>
		<dc:creator>University Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/business/rape-of-the-seas/#comment-54006</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rape of the Seas...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rape of the Seas&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim B</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/11024/rape-of-the-seas/comment-page-1/#comment-54000</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/business/rape-of-the-seas/#comment-54000</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know many fishermen that wear button down golf shirts, I&#039;m guessing that is a marine biologist or something.  Or someone that works at a fish packing plant maybe?

Scary stuff though, we eat fish at least once a week, mostly cod or Salmon.  Sometimes Tilapia, and now that I know Orange Roughie is that old I probably won&#039;t eat it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know many fishermen that wear button down golf shirts, I&#8217;m guessing that is a marine biologist or something.  Or someone that works at a fish packing plant maybe?</p>
<p>Scary stuff though, we eat fish at least once a week, mostly cod or Salmon.  Sometimes Tilapia, and now that I know Orange Roughie is that old I probably won&#8217;t eat it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/11024/rape-of-the-seas/comment-page-1/#comment-53996</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/business/rape-of-the-seas/#comment-53996</guid>
		<description>How did you happen to select the picture of a blond fisherman for this post rather than, say, a Japanese or Korean fisherman?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did you happen to select the picture of a blond fisherman for this post rather than, say, a Japanese or Korean fisherman?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

