<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Candidates Wise In Hiring Bloggers For Their Campaign Staffs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/10777/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10777/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:38:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hydrocodone.</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10777/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/comment-page-1/#comment-56771</link>
		<dc:creator>Hydrocodone.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 12:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/uncategorized/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/#comment-56771</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Hydrocodone apap....&lt;/strong&gt;

Hydrocodone....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hydrocodone apap&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Hydrocodone&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C Stanley</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10777/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/comment-page-1/#comment-51415</link>
		<dc:creator>C Stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 13:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/uncategorized/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/#comment-51415</guid>
		<description>Pyst,
There used to be a separate link below posts for trackbacks; with Wordpress it no longer seems to be there. It appears to me that when people DO link to a TMV post from their website, it appears here as a comment. Before it was listed as a trackback; now when you see those &quot;comments&quot; that are just links to other blogs, I think those ARE the trackbacks. In other words, that&#039;s not a blogger clicking on &quot;comment&quot; and posting his link, it&#039;s a blogger posting a trackback on his site which then shows up here as a comment. I just ignore them unless there&#039;s something in their tagline that sounds interesting enough to follow the link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pyst,<br />
There used to be a separate link below posts for trackbacks; with Wordpress it no longer seems to be there. It appears to me that when people DO link to a TMV post from their website, it appears here as a comment. Before it was listed as a trackback; now when you see those &#8220;comments&#8221; that are just links to other blogs, I think those ARE the trackbacks. In other words, that&#8217;s not a blogger clicking on &#8220;comment&#8221; and posting his link, it&#8217;s a blogger posting a trackback on his site which then shows up here as a comment. I just ignore them unless there&#8217;s something in their tagline that sounds interesting enough to follow the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pyst</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10777/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/comment-page-1/#comment-51360</link>
		<dc:creator>Pyst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 01:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/uncategorized/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/#comment-51360</guid>
		<description>The let em link the story on THIER website, not trash up the comment section....and is not only looks that way, it reads that way as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The let em link the story on THIER website, not trash up the comment section&#8230;.and is not only looks that way, it reads that way as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Upinsmoke</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10777/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/comment-page-1/#comment-51348</link>
		<dc:creator>Upinsmoke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 01:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/uncategorized/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/#comment-51348</guid>
		<description>If you hire someone that trash talks Catholics the perception is that you endorse that persons views, especially if you know about it and do nothing.

This is just reality.  If any of you bloggers want to be campaign bloggers I suggest you go to political correctness 101 and 102 and every other class they offer because if you say Poop one time.......your toast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you hire someone that trash talks Catholics the perception is that you endorse that persons views, especially if you know about it and do nothing.</p>
<p>This is just reality.  If any of you bloggers want to be campaign bloggers I suggest you go to political correctness 101 and 102 and every other class they offer because if you say Poop one time&#8230;&#8230;.your toast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polimom</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10777/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/comment-page-1/#comment-51182</link>
		<dc:creator>Polimom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 17:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/uncategorized/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/#comment-51182</guid>
		<description>Pyst -- those are trackbacks, not comments.  Other bloggers are &lt;em&gt;blogging &lt;/em&gt;about Joe&#039;s story.  Yes, that is a fuller form of commenting, but it&#039;s not a short blurp rant in and of itself (although I agree that it can look that way).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pyst &#8212; those are trackbacks, not comments.  Other bloggers are <em>blogging </em>about Joe&#8217;s story.  Yes, that is a fuller form of commenting, but it&#8217;s not a short blurp rant in and of itself (although I agree that it can look that way).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pyst</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10777/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/comment-page-1/#comment-51177</link>
		<dc:creator>Pyst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 17:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/uncategorized/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/#comment-51177</guid>
		<description>So blogs are commenting here now eh? 

Besides it making a sloppy mess of the comments section with nonsensical short blurp rants, it&#039;s making it harder to keep up with the actual friggen debate they apparently don&#039;t care to engage in going on here.

Punt em unless they as individuals care to debate, otherwise they are here to target bloggers. More fake outrage from the far right, sans the nuts to debate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So blogs are commenting here now eh? </p>
<p>Besides it making a sloppy mess of the comments section with nonsensical short blurp rants, it&#8217;s making it harder to keep up with the actual friggen debate they apparently don&#8217;t care to engage in going on here.</p>
<p>Punt em unless they as individuals care to debate, otherwise they are here to target bloggers. More fake outrage from the far right, sans the nuts to debate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelF</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10777/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/comment-page-1/#comment-51171</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/uncategorized/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/#comment-51171</guid>
		<description>Joe Gandelman said: 
February 8, 2007 at 10:40 am
They are highly respected among progressive bloggers. That is a fact. Maybe not with conservative bloggers, but, yes, they are respected among progressive bloggers. Like with anything else, you may find one who doesnâ€™t care for a post they may write, but theyâ€™re popular.




   Yes Joe . That is both a fact and an indictment. So I see no problem with going after Bloggers for what they say. Answering free speech with MORE free speech does not constitute an attack on the first amendment. These people own their remarks, period!
There is nothing special about the blogasphere which calls for different rules . This seems like a modern version of screaming sanctuary in a church. Unfortunately for some bloggers that went out in the 17th century.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Gandelman said:<br />
February 8, 2007 at 10:40 am<br />
They are highly respected among progressive bloggers. That is a fact. Maybe not with conservative bloggers, but, yes, they are respected among progressive bloggers. Like with anything else, you may find one who doesnâ€™t care for a post they may write, but theyâ€™re popular.</p>
<p>   Yes Joe . That is both a fact and an indictment. So I see no problem with going after Bloggers for what they say. Answering free speech with MORE free speech does not constitute an attack on the first amendment. These people own their remarks, period!<br />
There is nothing special about the blogasphere which calls for different rules . This seems like a modern version of screaming sanctuary in a church. Unfortunately for some bloggers that went out in the 17th century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C Stanley</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10777/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/comment-page-1/#comment-51145</link>
		<dc:creator>C Stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 14:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/uncategorized/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/#comment-51145</guid>
		<description>Joe, I wrote the comment because when I read your post (without having known much about the whole situation) I got one impression and when I followed up to learn more background I got a completely different impression. That led me to feel that you were somewhat dismissive of a key part of the issue. If you disagree with that, fine, but I wanted to point it out because other readers may agree with me and because I do think it gets back to the need for moderates to help keep debate centered on issues rather than attacks. Again, you disagree and don&#039;t have time to argue that point, fine, but there may be readers who get my point. In other words, don&#039;t assume that I&#039;m trying to pick at you personally or goad you into an argument; I&#039;m simply raising a point for others to consider, OK?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, I wrote the comment because when I read your post (without having known much about the whole situation) I got one impression and when I followed up to learn more background I got a completely different impression. That led me to feel that you were somewhat dismissive of a key part of the issue. If you disagree with that, fine, but I wanted to point it out because other readers may agree with me and because I do think it gets back to the need for moderates to help keep debate centered on issues rather than attacks. Again, you disagree and don&#8217;t have time to argue that point, fine, but there may be readers who get my point. In other words, don&#8217;t assume that I&#8217;m trying to pick at you personally or goad you into an argument; I&#8217;m simply raising a point for others to consider, OK?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Wing Nut House &#187; MAKING THE WORLD SAFE FOR BIGOTS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10777/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/comment-page-1/#comment-51136</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Wing Nut House &#187; MAKING THE WORLD SAFE FOR BIGOTS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 14:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/uncategorized/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/#comment-51136</guid>
		<description>[...] Joe Gandleman: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Joe Gandleman: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Gandelman</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10777/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/comment-page-1/#comment-51133</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Gandelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 13:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/uncategorized/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/#comment-51133</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have time to get into a nitpicking debate. I simply STATED about how popular they were. I was not doing a critique of their comments. I would not agree with everything they wrote and they would not agree with everything I wrote and have written (but no one totally agrees with me). I won&#039;t be at my computer most of today, but I&#039;m really not going to leave a zillion comments saying again that I made a simple statement and my post was not to endorse or blast what they wrote in comments or in their sites but to look at the bigger picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have time to get into a nitpicking debate. I simply STATED about how popular they were. I was not doing a critique of their comments. I would not agree with everything they wrote and they would not agree with everything I wrote and have written (but no one totally agrees with me). I won&#8217;t be at my computer most of today, but I&#8217;m really not going to leave a zillion comments saying again that I made a simple statement and my post was not to endorse or blast what they wrote in comments or in their sites but to look at the bigger picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C Stanley</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10777/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/comment-page-1/#comment-51132</link>
		<dc:creator>C Stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 13:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/uncategorized/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/#comment-51132</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I continue to be amazed that the assertion that these two bloggers are popular with progressive is being disputed. I did not say they are popular with conservatives. And the issue is not whether someone who is conservative likes them or not, the issue is whether it is accurate to say they are popular with many progressive readers and bloggers. That would be like me disputing that Protein Wisdom is a popular blog on the right if I disagreed with them on something. Sorry. They are popular.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Joe, I think that I&#039;m the only one who took issue with this so I assume this comment is in response to mine. I think you&#039;re misunderstanding. I am not disputing that they are popular with progressives, and I&#039;m not saying that you are correct to note that. But when I read your initial post where you ONLY said that, without acknowledging that part of the reason for their popularity is their attack rhetoric (or at least acknowledging that they use those kinds of arguments and it is accepted by progressives). In other words, fine to acknowledge that they&#039;re respected by progressives, but should they be respected by moderates?? What happened to the dire need to change the dialogue in American and tone down the hate speech?

In other words, I felt that you were somewhat dismissive of their over-the-top comments. Everybody does it now and then, no big deal, par for the course in blogtopia.

And frankly I don&#039;t get the idea that a hire by a candidate shouldn&#039;t take history into account, or that there shouldn&#039;t be any guilt by association. Most people here were critical of the Harold Ford ads...so if a future GOP candidate uses the same ad agency, there&#039;s no issue with that? No accusations that he/she might approve of the use of subtle racist messages (not that I agree with that- but for those who felt that way about those ads, I doubt they would be willing to ignore the history). I guess you could say that what these bloggers wrote on their blogs didn&#039;t represent the kind of writing that they will now do for Edwards as his representative, but I think that ignores the fact that he obviously hired them for the way they communicate and the way their readers respond to him; he is trying to court that audience. I wouldn&#039;t say there&#039;s anything wrong with that, but doing so also causes backlash with people who are offended by the bloggers and candidates should accept that as part of the deal and decide if it still weighs in their favor.

And, I would think that moderates would prefer candidates who aren&#039;t trying to play the two sides of the political spectrum off of each other. If you don&#039;t feel that this applies to this situation, I&#039;m trying to figure out why not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I continue to be amazed that the assertion that these two bloggers are popular with progressive is being disputed. I did not say they are popular with conservatives. And the issue is not whether someone who is conservative likes them or not, the issue is whether it is accurate to say they are popular with many progressive readers and bloggers. That would be like me disputing that Protein Wisdom is a popular blog on the right if I disagreed with them on something. Sorry. They are popular.</p></blockquote>
<p>Joe, I think that I&#8217;m the only one who took issue with this so I assume this comment is in response to mine. I think you&#8217;re misunderstanding. I am not disputing that they are popular with progressives, and I&#8217;m not saying that you are correct to note that. But when I read your initial post where you ONLY said that, without acknowledging that part of the reason for their popularity is their attack rhetoric (or at least acknowledging that they use those kinds of arguments and it is accepted by progressives). In other words, fine to acknowledge that they&#8217;re respected by progressives, but should they be respected by moderates?? What happened to the dire need to change the dialogue in American and tone down the hate speech?</p>
<p>In other words, I felt that you were somewhat dismissive of their over-the-top comments. Everybody does it now and then, no big deal, par for the course in blogtopia.</p>
<p>And frankly I don&#8217;t get the idea that a hire by a candidate shouldn&#8217;t take history into account, or that there shouldn&#8217;t be any guilt by association. Most people here were critical of the Harold Ford ads&#8230;so if a future GOP candidate uses the same ad agency, there&#8217;s no issue with that? No accusations that he/she might approve of the use of subtle racist messages (not that I agree with that- but for those who felt that way about those ads, I doubt they would be willing to ignore the history). I guess you could say that what these bloggers wrote on their blogs didn&#8217;t represent the kind of writing that they will now do for Edwards as his representative, but I think that ignores the fact that he obviously hired them for the way they communicate and the way their readers respond to him; he is trying to court that audience. I wouldn&#8217;t say there&#8217;s anything wrong with that, but doing so also causes backlash with people who are offended by the bloggers and candidates should accept that as part of the deal and decide if it still weighs in their favor.</p>
<p>And, I would think that moderates would prefer candidates who aren&#8217;t trying to play the two sides of the political spectrum off of each other. If you don&#8217;t feel that this applies to this situation, I&#8217;m trying to figure out why not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pajamas Media</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10777/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/comment-page-1/#comment-51129</link>
		<dc:creator>Pajamas Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 13:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/uncategorized/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/#comment-51129</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Are Candidates Wise In Hiring Bloggers?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Joe Gandelman looks at the Marcotte and McEwan brouhaha and concludes: &quot;Be forewarned: itâ€™s likely to happen now to all bloggers who want to join campaign staffs of any party. The bar has been moved with a little less freedom......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Are Candidates Wise In Hiring Bloggers?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Joe Gandelman looks at the Marcotte and McEwan brouhaha and concludes: &#8220;Be forewarned: itâ€™s likely to happen now to all bloggers who want to join campaign staffs of any party. The bar has been moved with a little less freedom&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Gandelman</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10777/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/comment-page-1/#comment-51106</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Gandelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 08:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/uncategorized/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/#comment-51106</guid>
		<description>Greetings! I drove 450 miles today so just got online. A few comments on comments:
1)I continue to be amazed that the assertion that these two bloggers are popular with progressive is being disputed. I did &lt;strong&gt;not &lt;/strong&gt;say they are popular with &lt;em&gt;conservatives&lt;/em&gt;. And the issue is not whether someone who is conservative likes them or not, the issue is whether it is accurate to say they are popular with many progressive readers and bloggers. That would be like me disputing that Protein Wisdom is a popular blog on the right if I disagreed with them on something. Sorry. They are popular.
&lt;strong&gt;2)I would like to remind everyone that it does not add to the debate when personal characterizations are made about people who write weblogs -- whether on the right, center, left.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt; The more we get into the 21st century, the more our discussion seems to be centering onto going after someone personally. &lt;/em&gt;
3)THAT being said, I see a link from a blog here that I need to mention. FYI, I don&#039;t berate other bloggers because they have different views, but to each his or her own. However, a comment about me needing to police our comments &lt;em&gt;would have been  nicer and taken more seriously if it was emailed.&lt;/em&gt; I don&#039;t even hinge on doing blogwars with other bloggers and frankly don&#039;t read people who try to suck me into them. Time is very limited and there are many superb writers on the internet, many of them on blogs that don&#039;t get links or the attention they deserve. The blog that ran that item is one I have linked to and like and will continue to read.  But after driving from San Diego to Tucson and seeing that comment with no EMAIL SUGGESTION in my mind made me think it&#039;s just a swipe at this site because of disagreeing with our views (the typical way politics runs these days) rather than a suggestion.

We&#039;re just really starting on the more detailed monitoring of comments.

Rather than remove any of the above, I would advise all those reading them to note: &lt;strong&gt;it is more intelligent to stick to the issues and not make comments about people&#039;s looks etc&lt;/strong&gt;. It doesn&#039;t matter if a blogger is right left or centrist. (Of course it&#039;s easy for me to say since I look like Brad Pitt.). That being said, if someone has a complaint it will be taken seriously if we get an email, not if we read a link and find that a sarcastic comment with no email pointing something out to us. In fact, we have done MANY internal emails on the need to police comments. But I think the write of that post wasn&#039;t interested in the quality of our comments. Someone interested in serious discussion and quality control would have emailed me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings! I drove 450 miles today so just got online. A few comments on comments:<br />
1)I continue to be amazed that the assertion that these two bloggers are popular with progressive is being disputed. I did <strong>not </strong>say they are popular with <em>conservatives</em>. And the issue is not whether someone who is conservative likes them or not, the issue is whether it is accurate to say they are popular with many progressive readers and bloggers. That would be like me disputing that Protein Wisdom is a popular blog on the right if I disagreed with them on something. Sorry. They are popular.<br />
<strong>2)I would like to remind everyone that it does not add to the debate when personal characterizations are made about people who write weblogs &#8212; whether on the right, center, left.</strong><em> The more we get into the 21st century, the more our discussion seems to be centering onto going after someone personally. </em><br />
3)THAT being said, I see a link from a blog here that I need to mention. FYI, I don&#8217;t berate other bloggers because they have different views, but to each his or her own. However, a comment about me needing to police our comments <em>would have been  nicer and taken more seriously if it was emailed.</em> I don&#8217;t even hinge on doing blogwars with other bloggers and frankly don&#8217;t read people who try to suck me into them. Time is very limited and there are many superb writers on the internet, many of them on blogs that don&#8217;t get links or the attention they deserve. The blog that ran that item is one I have linked to and like and will continue to read.  But after driving from San Diego to Tucson and seeing that comment with no EMAIL SUGGESTION in my mind made me think it&#8217;s just a swipe at this site because of disagreeing with our views (the typical way politics runs these days) rather than a suggestion.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re just really starting on the more detailed monitoring of comments.</p>
<p>Rather than remove any of the above, I would advise all those reading them to note: <strong>it is more intelligent to stick to the issues and not make comments about people&#8217;s looks etc</strong>. It doesn&#8217;t matter if a blogger is right left or centrist. (Of course it&#8217;s easy for me to say since I look like Brad Pitt.). That being said, if someone has a complaint it will be taken seriously if we get an email, not if we read a link and find that a sarcastic comment with no email pointing something out to us. In fact, we have done MANY internal emails on the need to police comments. But I think the write of that post wasn&#8217;t interested in the quality of our comments. Someone interested in serious discussion and quality control would have emailed me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winds of Change.NET</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10777/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/comment-page-1/#comment-51095</link>
		<dc:creator>Winds of Change.NET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 05:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/uncategorized/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/#comment-51095</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Shocked, Just Shocked To Discover......&lt;/strong&gt;

Joe Gandleman is worried that what bloggers say may matter enough to be held against them......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Shocked, Just Shocked To Discover&#8230;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Joe Gandleman is worried that what bloggers say may matter enough to be held against them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edwards Backs Down at Conservative Times--Republican GOP news source.</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10777/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/comment-page-1/#comment-51069</link>
		<dc:creator>Edwards Backs Down at Conservative Times--Republican GOP news source.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 02:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/uncategorized/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/#comment-51069</guid>
		<description>[...] Contrary to the opinions of some well-intentioned bloggers, this never had anything to do with free speech. It had to do with the judgment of the Edwards campaign in hiring two incendiary bloggers known in part for their hostility to Christians. It&#8217;s really no different than the eruption of attacks from the Left after Spocko went after KSFO and its incendiary talk-show hosts. He and other bloggers organized campaigns to scare advertisers away from the station and its shows after their own &#8220;hate speech&#8221; offended him. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Contrary to the opinions of some well-intentioned bloggers, this never had anything to do with free speech. It had to do with the judgment of the Edwards campaign in hiring two incendiary bloggers known in part for their hostility to Christians. It&#8217;s really no different than the eruption of attacks from the Left after Spocko went after KSFO and its incendiary talk-show hosts. He and other bloggers organized campaigns to scare advertisers away from the station and its shows after their own &#8220;hate speech&#8221; offended him. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain's Quarters</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10777/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/comment-page-1/#comment-51067</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain's Quarters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 01:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/uncategorized/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/#comment-51067</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Edwards Backs Down...&lt;/strong&gt;

John Edwards had to pick between two bad choices today in order to contain the damage from the controversial prior writings of two bloggers hired by his campaign as liaisons to Internet activists. The former VP nominee, stuck between offending......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Edwards Backs Down&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>John Edwards had to pick between two bad choices today in order to contain the damage from the controversial prior writings of two bloggers hired by his campaign as liaisons to Internet activists. The former VP nominee, stuck between offending&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pyst</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10777/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/comment-page-1/#comment-51023</link>
		<dc:creator>Pyst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 22:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/uncategorized/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/#comment-51023</guid>
		<description>This is a post from Crooks and Liars just so we can see how this is supposed to work, bloggers bad (so says media giants), political operatives with big cash ultra okee fine.....

&quot;Yet, worse even, is that the press would try to turn &quot;bad language&quot; into a controversy (or now it&#039;s anti-Catholic ideas I hearâ€¦um, Bob Jones anyone?) and ignore a McCain campaign manager Terry Nelson. As head of the NRSC&#039;s independent expenditure unit in 2006, Nelson is the one who approved the &quot;call me&quot; race-baiting ad that played on fears of miscegenation, which led those liberals at Wal-Mart to fire his firm they found it so offensive.

Nelson was an unindicted co-conspirator of Tom DeLay&#039;s in his money laundering scheme in Texas (the TRMPAC scandal), and was forced to testify in the matter. He was also in the middle of Republican efforts to jam phones in New Hampshire in 2002, to hamper the Democratic GOTV effort in a tight senate race. He was James Tobin&#039;s boss at the RNC, a man who was eventually convicted of this crime. Nothing fishy there.&quot;

Ok lets see here....race baiting gets him fired from uber righty Wal Mart, he&#039;s an old buddy of Delay&#039;s of TRMPAC fame, and then buddies with the guy that goes down for phone jamming during an election in New Hampshire. Yep those two bloggers are evil and have to go right now! But dare not speak ill of GOP operatives mass media! LMAO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a post from Crooks and Liars just so we can see how this is supposed to work, bloggers bad (so says media giants), political operatives with big cash ultra okee fine&#8230;..</p>
<p>&#8220;Yet, worse even, is that the press would try to turn &#8220;bad language&#8221; into a controversy (or now it&#8217;s anti-Catholic ideas I hearâ€¦um, Bob Jones anyone?) and ignore a McCain campaign manager Terry Nelson. As head of the NRSC&#8217;s independent expenditure unit in 2006, Nelson is the one who approved the &#8220;call me&#8221; race-baiting ad that played on fears of miscegenation, which led those liberals at Wal-Mart to fire his firm they found it so offensive.</p>
<p>Nelson was an unindicted co-conspirator of Tom DeLay&#8217;s in his money laundering scheme in Texas (the TRMPAC scandal), and was forced to testify in the matter. He was also in the middle of Republican efforts to jam phones in New Hampshire in 2002, to hamper the Democratic GOTV effort in a tight senate race. He was James Tobin&#8217;s boss at the RNC, a man who was eventually convicted of this crime. Nothing fishy there.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ok lets see here&#8230;.race baiting gets him fired from uber righty Wal Mart, he&#8217;s an old buddy of Delay&#8217;s of TRMPAC fame, and then buddies with the guy that goes down for phone jamming during an election in New Hampshire. Yep those two bloggers are evil and have to go right now! But dare not speak ill of GOP operatives mass media! LMAO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kritter</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10777/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/comment-page-1/#comment-50988</link>
		<dc:creator>kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 21:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/uncategorized/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/#comment-50988</guid>
		<description>I personally plan on voting for a candidate with a rating of 0-1, so Edwards may be too conservative for me anyway. Has MM announced, or is he busy with the sequel to  Fahrenheit 9/11-? 

BTW, I vastly prefer narcissistic commentators  and  bloviating self-important ones  to those who really know anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally plan on voting for a candidate with a rating of 0-1, so Edwards may be too conservative for me anyway. Has MM announced, or is he busy with the sequel to  Fahrenheit 9/11-? </p>
<p>BTW, I vastly prefer narcissistic commentators  and  bloviating self-important ones  to those who really know anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudi</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10777/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/comment-page-1/#comment-50982</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 20:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/uncategorized/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/#comment-50982</guid>
		<description>Maybe a Mr. Kate O&#039;Beirn loyalt test for a translator job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe a Mr. Kate O&#8217;Beirn loyalt test for a translator job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudi</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10777/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/comment-page-1/#comment-50980</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 20:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/uncategorized/are-candidates-wise-in-hiring-bloggers-for-their-campaign-staffs/#comment-50980</guid>
		<description>CS - The Joe McCarthy crowd now check into your web activity for job consideration. Next a DNA sample to see if you swing Left or swing Right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CS &#8211; The Joe McCarthy crowd now check into your web activity for job consideration. Next a DNA sample to see if you swing Left or swing Right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
