<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Pressure Works</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/10563/look-thats-my-boy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10563/look-thats-my-boy/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:06:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael van der Galien</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10563/look-thats-my-boy/comment-page-1/#comment-47706</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael van der Galien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/war/iran/look-thats-my-boy/#comment-47706</guid>
		<description>Mikkel: that&#039;s a nice interpretation and it&#039;s partially even correct. The problem: he doesn&#039;t attribute those sanctions for instance, measure, etc. to those who are actually responsible for them: hawks.

Also the militaristic talk &lt;em&gt;is a factor or so it seems&lt;/em&gt;: people are afraid that the U.S. will attack. 

With this, however, I agree:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Of course, the larger aims of Iran (vis a vis nuclear weapons and regional influence) are hardly confined to Ahmedinejad so I think focusing on him is misguided.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mikkel: that&#8217;s a nice interpretation and it&#8217;s partially even correct. The problem: he doesn&#8217;t attribute those sanctions for instance, measure, etc. to those who are actually responsible for them: hawks.</p>
<p>Also the militaristic talk <em>is a factor or so it seems</em>: people are afraid that the U.S. will attack. </p>
<p>With this, however, I agree:</p>
<blockquote><p>Of course, the larger aims of Iran (vis a vis nuclear weapons and regional influence) are hardly confined to Ahmedinejad so I think focusing on him is misguided.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikkel</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10563/look-thats-my-boy/comment-page-1/#comment-47705</link>
		<dc:creator>mikkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/war/iran/look-thats-my-boy/#comment-47705</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused what &quot;hawk&quot; means in your response Michael. The way I interpreted the op-ed was that aggressive &lt;em&gt;political and economic&lt;/em&gt; measures were helpful while bellicose militaristic ones aren&#039;t. I fully agree with this. Maybe I misinterpreted what was written because I felt like it agreed, but I think that the status quo is enough to bring down Ahmedinejad down because he got power on economic populism and that is failing. That and he&#039;s crazy. Basically the only way to keep support is through messianic rhetoric, but this directly threatens the Ayatollahs so I don&#039;t see them putting up with it if that goes much further.

Of course, the larger aims of Iran (vis a vis nuclear weapons and regional influence) are hardly confined to Ahmedinejad so I think focusing on him is misguided.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused what &#8220;hawk&#8221; means in your response Michael. The way I interpreted the op-ed was that aggressive <em>political and economic</em> measures were helpful while bellicose militaristic ones aren&#8217;t. I fully agree with this. Maybe I misinterpreted what was written because I felt like it agreed, but I think that the status quo is enough to bring down Ahmedinejad down because he got power on economic populism and that is failing. That and he&#8217;s crazy. Basically the only way to keep support is through messianic rhetoric, but this directly threatens the Ayatollahs so I don&#8217;t see them putting up with it if that goes much further.</p>
<p>Of course, the larger aims of Iran (vis a vis nuclear weapons and regional influence) are hardly confined to Ahmedinejad so I think focusing on him is misguided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudi</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10563/look-thats-my-boy/comment-page-1/#comment-47697</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/war/iran/look-thats-my-boy/#comment-47697</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;He very soon forgot the real help he had received in ensuring his election, basking in the belief that God and the people had put him in power.&lt;/strong&gt;
Is the author writing about W or Wackjob? The op-ed is no worse than the Taheri or Kazimi drivel the hawks trumpets. Patches and flowers from Saddam!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>He very soon forgot the real help he had received in ensuring his election, basking in the belief that God and the people had put him in power.</strong><br />
Is the author writing about W or Wackjob? The op-ed is no worse than the Taheri or Kazimi drivel the hawks trumpets. Patches and flowers from Saddam!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Right Nation</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10563/look-thats-my-boy/comment-page-1/#comment-47694</link>
		<dc:creator>The Right Nation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/war/iran/look-thats-my-boy/#comment-47694</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Guardian (of the Islamic Revolution)...&lt;/strong&gt;

Secondo Ali Ansari, sul Guardian, la &quot;luna di miele&quot; tra il popolo iraniano e Ahmadinejad sarebbe ormai agli sgoccioli. Ma l&#039;insistenza dei falchi americani potrebbe aiutare Mad Mahmoud a restare in sella nonostante tutto. Una tesi bizzarra, di cui ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Guardian (of the Islamic Revolution)&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Secondo Ali Ansari, sul Guardian, la &#8220;luna di miele&#8221; tra il popolo iraniano e Ahmadinejad sarebbe ormai agli sgoccioli. Ma l&#8217;insistenza dei falchi americani potrebbe aiutare Mad Mahmoud a restare in sella nonostante tutto. Una tesi bizzarra, di cui &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

