<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: O&#8217;Reilly Out of Line &#8230; Again (UPDATE)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/10349/oreilly-out-of-line-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10349/oreilly-out-of-line-again/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:43:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris-moderate -democrat</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10349/oreilly-out-of-line-again/comment-page-1/#comment-45046</link>
		<dc:creator>chris-moderate -democrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media-criticism/oreilly-out-of-line-again/#comment-45046</guid>
		<description>How can this show still get high ratings? Even viewers of O&#039;Reilly must draw the line somewhere! I&#039;ve never hated O&#039;Reilly before, yes I disagreed and didn&#039;t like him but this is truelly something despicable. Maybe he sympasizes with a pervert since he himself is one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can this show still get high ratings? Even viewers of O&#8217;Reilly must draw the line somewhere! I&#8217;ve never hated O&#8217;Reilly before, yes I disagreed and didn&#8217;t like him but this is truelly something despicable. Maybe he sympasizes with a pervert since he himself is one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Ritter</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10349/oreilly-out-of-line-again/comment-page-1/#comment-45038</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Ritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media-criticism/oreilly-out-of-line-again/#comment-45038</guid>
		<description>I watched both shows. I thought O&#039;Reilly appeared uncomfortable and combative on both. On &lt;em&gt;The Colbert Report&lt;/em&gt;, (which was deliciously hilarious last night) Colbert made mincemeat out of O&#039;Reilly with his typical brilliantly subtle satire. 

Why did Bill go willingly into the enemy camp? I honestly think its because he wants most to be what he cannot be ---cool and funny like the satirist who has made a prosperous career out of mocking him. Message to Stephen- the copy (which he gleefully stated he has not read) of &quot;The Culture Warrior&quot; with the 30% off sticker over Bill-O&#039;s face was a brilliant touch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched both shows. I thought O&#8217;Reilly appeared uncomfortable and combative on both. On <em>The Colbert Report</em>, (which was deliciously hilarious last night) Colbert made mincemeat out of O&#8217;Reilly with his typical brilliantly subtle satire. </p>
<p>Why did Bill go willingly into the enemy camp? I honestly think its because he wants most to be what he cannot be &#8212;cool and funny like the satirist who has made a prosperous career out of mocking him. Message to Stephen- the copy (which he gleefully stated he has not read) of &#8220;The Culture Warrior&#8221; with the 30% off sticker over Bill-O&#8217;s face was a brilliant touch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gal</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10349/oreilly-out-of-line-again/comment-page-1/#comment-45030</link>
		<dc:creator>gal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media-criticism/oreilly-out-of-line-again/#comment-45030</guid>
		<description>I watched O&#039;R last night to see Colbert on there, and it&#039;s the first time I&#039;ve managed to watch more than 5 minutes of his show without stomach pains and double-vision. 

O&#039;R brings to mind that thing my mom used to say about a kid that picked on me in kindergarden: If we ignore him, he&#039;ll go away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched O&#8217;R last night to see Colbert on there, and it&#8217;s the first time I&#8217;ve managed to watch more than 5 minutes of his show without stomach pains and double-vision. </p>
<p>O&#8217;R brings to mind that thing my mom used to say about a kid that picked on me in kindergarden: If we ignore him, he&#8217;ll go away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Prez</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10349/oreilly-out-of-line-again/comment-page-1/#comment-45019</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Prez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media-criticism/oreilly-out-of-line-again/#comment-45019</guid>
		<description>Colbert is a clever man.  I watched last night and it was hilarious!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colbert is a clever man.  I watched last night and it was hilarious!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Ritter</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10349/oreilly-out-of-line-again/comment-page-1/#comment-44954</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Ritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 04:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media-criticism/oreilly-out-of-line-again/#comment-44954</guid>
		<description>Billo is really strange. He actually did not understand the outrage over his remarks. He considers them legitemate questions which meet high journalistic standards. Now I get why he always supports the President- they&#039;re both totally delusional!

I got the distinct impression that as much as he trashes the liberal elite media outlets, it really gets under his skin that they don&#039;t accept them. He wants to be a part of mainstream America, and not just appeal to  a limited audience of wingers. The man&#039;s ego is the size of Texas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Billo is really strange. He actually did not understand the outrage over his remarks. He considers them legitemate questions which meet high journalistic standards. Now I get why he always supports the President- they&#8217;re both totally delusional!</p>
<p>I got the distinct impression that as much as he trashes the liberal elite media outlets, it really gets under his skin that they don&#8217;t accept them. He wants to be a part of mainstream America, and not just appeal to  a limited audience of wingers. The man&#8217;s ego is the size of Texas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeYourGuest</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10349/oreilly-out-of-line-again/comment-page-1/#comment-44945</link>
		<dc:creator>BeYourGuest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 03:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media-criticism/oreilly-out-of-line-again/#comment-44945</guid>
		<description>Crook and Liars has the video of Colbert on the Factor &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/01/18/colbert-on-the-oreilly-factor/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;HERE&lt;/A&gt;. 

It&#039;s funny cuz it&#039;s truthy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crook and Liars has the video of Colbert on the Factor <a HREF="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/01/18/colbert-on-the-oreilly-factor/" rel="nofollow">HERE</a>. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny cuz it&#8217;s truthy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: derrick cho</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10349/oreilly-out-of-line-again/comment-page-1/#comment-44939</link>
		<dc:creator>derrick cho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 02:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media-criticism/oreilly-out-of-line-again/#comment-44939</guid>
		<description>O&#039;relly has alwas been odd on the general subject of male/male.  Those who knew him on the way up recount him as an insecure guy who always said he was not ok, even thouugh no one asked. In one of his books he announces with the great wisdom that has so impressed the elderly women who loved him (with the same passion they felt for Liberace&quot; that men want sex, women want to get married.  He thin goes on to say how in his glory days he had sex every night with people he met in disco clubs.

The odd phone cal so hurriedly covered up is another strange thing, while doing something odd with a vibrator he calls up a woman and somehow gets around to manipulating &quot;falafels.&quot;

O&#039;elly may simply be projecting how he *thinks* he would respond if he was molested as a reenager by a guy with video games.  He obviously had issiues with his father.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O&#8217;relly has alwas been odd on the general subject of male/male.  Those who knew him on the way up recount him as an insecure guy who always said he was not ok, even thouugh no one asked. In one of his books he announces with the great wisdom that has so impressed the elderly women who loved him (with the same passion they felt for Liberace&#8221; that men want sex, women want to get married.  He thin goes on to say how in his glory days he had sex every night with people he met in disco clubs.</p>
<p>The odd phone cal so hurriedly covered up is another strange thing, while doing something odd with a vibrator he calls up a woman and somehow gets around to manipulating &#8220;falafels.&#8221;</p>
<p>O&#8217;elly may simply be projecting how he *thinks* he would respond if he was molested as a reenager by a guy with video games.  He obviously had issiues with his father.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vwcat</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10349/oreilly-out-of-line-again/comment-page-1/#comment-44938</link>
		<dc:creator>vwcat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 02:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media-criticism/oreilly-out-of-line-again/#comment-44938</guid>
		<description>this is beyond him being his usual stupid self.  It&#039;s disgusting and unforgivable.  As Keith O. says, he is reprehensible and should not be on tv anymore.
It&#039;s okay to go after the opposition but, since when did that become abused kids???   He is slime.  pure slime and I hope he gets so much grief this ruins him.  I usually ignore the creep but, this is beyond all that is decent and I&#039;d bet even the repukes think it is beyond bounds.
O&#039;Rielly is slithering slime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is beyond him being his usual stupid self.  It&#8217;s disgusting and unforgivable.  As Keith O. says, he is reprehensible and should not be on tv anymore.<br />
It&#8217;s okay to go after the opposition but, since when did that become abused kids???   He is slime.  pure slime and I hope he gets so much grief this ruins him.  I usually ignore the creep but, this is beyond all that is decent and I&#8217;d bet even the repukes think it is beyond bounds.<br />
O&#8217;Rielly is slithering slime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudi</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10349/oreilly-out-of-line-again/comment-page-1/#comment-44929</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 01:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media-criticism/oreilly-out-of-line-again/#comment-44929</guid>
		<description>Watching the Gasbag right at this moment. He is accusing TMV of being a &#039;Left wing smear website&#039;(LOL). Bernie Goldberg is sucking up to Luffaman, Jane Hall is giving him hell. What a brave man, over 6&#039;4&quot; tall, attacking and using a 15 year old kidnap victim for sensationalism. Brave Brave Billo........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watching the Gasbag right at this moment. He is accusing TMV of being a &#8216;Left wing smear website&#8217;(LOL). Bernie Goldberg is sucking up to Luffaman, Jane Hall is giving him hell. What a brave man, over 6&#8217;4&#8243; tall, attacking and using a 15 year old kidnap victim for sensationalism. Brave Brave Billo&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Ritter</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10349/oreilly-out-of-line-again/comment-page-1/#comment-44919</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Ritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media-criticism/oreilly-out-of-line-again/#comment-44919</guid>
		<description>Why do Shawn and his family owe us any explanation at all? Does the public&#039;s need to know really outweigh the boy&#039;s need for privacy? To be honest, I think the family should be shielding him more from the press, instead of granting interviews, but this should be a joyful moment for all concerned (except Devlin). The odds of his family getting him back after all this time are so slim, that we should be celebrating it as  a minor miracle, and giving kudos to law enforcement, instead of making slimy insinuations to stay a ratings winner in our time slot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do Shawn and his family owe us any explanation at all? Does the public&#8217;s need to know really outweigh the boy&#8217;s need for privacy? To be honest, I think the family should be shielding him more from the press, instead of granting interviews, but this should be a joyful moment for all concerned (except Devlin). The odds of his family getting him back after all this time are so slim, that we should be celebrating it as  a minor miracle, and giving kudos to law enforcement, instead of making slimy insinuations to stay a ratings winner in our time slot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitiori</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10349/oreilly-out-of-line-again/comment-page-1/#comment-44910</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitiori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 22:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media-criticism/oreilly-out-of-line-again/#comment-44910</guid>
		<description>If we didn&#039;t know it already, this is a sure sign that FOX has gone to far in mixing entertainment with &quot;news&quot;. I sent my email.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we didn&#8217;t know it already, this is a sure sign that FOX has gone to far in mixing entertainment with &#8220;news&#8221;. I sent my email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SurgeJack</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10349/oreilly-out-of-line-again/comment-page-1/#comment-44908</link>
		<dc:creator>SurgeJack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 22:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media-criticism/oreilly-out-of-line-again/#comment-44908</guid>
		<description>It just tickles me in an unfashionable sense when fellows suddenly up the ante of their moral convictions. They can post reasonably for months, and then suddenly, they care about this more than anything else. They&#039;re &#039;apalled.&#039; Yeah, it&#039;s fair to be apalled if you&#039;re never seen this sort of thing, but to find it apalling considering all that you&#039;ve managed to talk reasonably about is just tricking yourself into heightening the function and worthiness of your existence. You&#039;re not going to get O&#039;Reilly sacked. 

So, just stop the whole business of feigning this supposedly novel outrage when something happens that seems to have a populist appeal in its scorn. It was the same thing with Rush Limbaugh and the Viagra. I don&#039;t give a darn about Rush having Viagra, even if it wasn&#039;t his. That&#039;s not what the folks that were hollerin&#039; about it had actually had issue with him for. That&#039;s not what I&#039;d have issue with him over.

Honestly, it&#039;s like looking at a crook, and yelling at him because you found nudie pictures in his car. Yes, people might find him disgusting for the nudie pictures, but if your issue with him is the whole bit about being a crook, perhaps you should prosecute that instead of something sensationalists can get behind. 

When you feign or try to muster up moral outrage over something like this, it undermines the convictions you actually hold with regard to more importan things. You&#039;re not going to get O&#039;Reilly sacked, so just find something that actually matters, and post about that. At least this way, you won&#039;t be making a difference in something that&#039;s might merit making a difference in, whereas currently, you&#039;re not making a difference in something that&#039;s utterly pointless. 

It&#039;s nonsense. Thanks for giving O&#039;Reilly some ratings boost as he can now claim he&#039;s being attacked by ingenuine moonbat types and get on with his life. Thanks for giving yourselves a sense of presence, importance, or moral indignation, by taking the clear side in a sensationalist attraction. Most of all, thanks for showing that whenever it is you decide to do things that won&#039;t matter or affect anything, you intend to direct those things toward matters as insignificant as your ineffective courses of action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It just tickles me in an unfashionable sense when fellows suddenly up the ante of their moral convictions. They can post reasonably for months, and then suddenly, they care about this more than anything else. They&#8217;re &#8216;apalled.&#8217; Yeah, it&#8217;s fair to be apalled if you&#8217;re never seen this sort of thing, but to find it apalling considering all that you&#8217;ve managed to talk reasonably about is just tricking yourself into heightening the function and worthiness of your existence. You&#8217;re not going to get O&#8217;Reilly sacked. </p>
<p>So, just stop the whole business of feigning this supposedly novel outrage when something happens that seems to have a populist appeal in its scorn. It was the same thing with Rush Limbaugh and the Viagra. I don&#8217;t give a darn about Rush having Viagra, even if it wasn&#8217;t his. That&#8217;s not what the folks that were hollerin&#8217; about it had actually had issue with him for. That&#8217;s not what I&#8217;d have issue with him over.</p>
<p>Honestly, it&#8217;s like looking at a crook, and yelling at him because you found nudie pictures in his car. Yes, people might find him disgusting for the nudie pictures, but if your issue with him is the whole bit about being a crook, perhaps you should prosecute that instead of something sensationalists can get behind. </p>
<p>When you feign or try to muster up moral outrage over something like this, it undermines the convictions you actually hold with regard to more importan things. You&#8217;re not going to get O&#8217;Reilly sacked, so just find something that actually matters, and post about that. At least this way, you won&#8217;t be making a difference in something that&#8217;s might merit making a difference in, whereas currently, you&#8217;re not making a difference in something that&#8217;s utterly pointless. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s nonsense. Thanks for giving O&#8217;Reilly some ratings boost as he can now claim he&#8217;s being attacked by ingenuine moonbat types and get on with his life. Thanks for giving yourselves a sense of presence, importance, or moral indignation, by taking the clear side in a sensationalist attraction. Most of all, thanks for showing that whenever it is you decide to do things that won&#8217;t matter or affect anything, you intend to direct those things toward matters as insignificant as your ineffective courses of action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10349/oreilly-out-of-line-again/comment-page-1/#comment-44903</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 22:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media-criticism/oreilly-out-of-line-again/#comment-44903</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;s looking out for the kids? Pedophiles, kidnappers and and their apologists? 

For shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;s looking out for the kids? Pedophiles, kidnappers and and their apologists? </p>
<p>For shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosmoetica</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10349/oreilly-out-of-line-again/comment-page-1/#comment-44902</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmoetica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 22:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media-criticism/oreilly-out-of-line-again/#comment-44902</guid>
		<description>SurgeJack: Bingo! It seems you&#039;re one of the few who will not pant on demand!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SurgeJack: Bingo! It seems you&#8217;re one of the few who will not pant on demand!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AustinRoth</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10349/oreilly-out-of-line-again/comment-page-1/#comment-44900</link>
		<dc:creator>AustinRoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media-criticism/oreilly-out-of-line-again/#comment-44900</guid>
		<description>This is not a Republican/Democratic or liberal/conservative, beyond the obvious of Mr. O&#039;Reilly&#039;s known political leanings.

It is one of the following - an uneducated statement by a person that should know better; a blatant attempt to get attention (ratings) via a insidiously disingenuous statement at the expense of the victim; or a unbelievably spiteful statement that indicates the perhaps Mr. O&#039;Reilly has some unresolved issues of his own. Or some combination of all three.

Given the known reactions of adults in hostage/captive situations, to believe that a young child (and he was only 11 when kidnapped) somehow should be expected to react differently is patently absurd.

The worst part is that this only gives voice to other ignorant people, and is emblematic of the issues that will face this now young man as he strives to re-establish a normal life. 

Meanwhile, ultimately, basically nothing happens to O&#039;Reilly. 

Disgusting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not a Republican/Democratic or liberal/conservative, beyond the obvious of Mr. O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s known political leanings.</p>
<p>It is one of the following &#8211; an uneducated statement by a person that should know better; a blatant attempt to get attention (ratings) via a insidiously disingenuous statement at the expense of the victim; or a unbelievably spiteful statement that indicates the perhaps Mr. O&#8217;Reilly has some unresolved issues of his own. Or some combination of all three.</p>
<p>Given the known reactions of adults in hostage/captive situations, to believe that a young child (and he was only 11 when kidnapped) somehow should be expected to react differently is patently absurd.</p>
<p>The worst part is that this only gives voice to other ignorant people, and is emblematic of the issues that will face this now young man as he strives to re-establish a normal life. </p>
<p>Meanwhile, ultimately, basically nothing happens to O&#8217;Reilly. </p>
<p>Disgusting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10349/oreilly-out-of-line-again/comment-page-1/#comment-44897</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media-criticism/oreilly-out-of-line-again/#comment-44897</guid>
		<description>O&#039;Reilly like to talk with authority on matters he doesn&#039;t have a clue about.  I&#039;m really looking forward to watching Colbert bitchslap him on primetime and late night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O&#8217;Reilly like to talk with authority on matters he doesn&#8217;t have a clue about.  I&#8217;m really looking forward to watching Colbert bitchslap him on primetime and late night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uncle joe mccarthy</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10349/oreilly-out-of-line-again/comment-page-1/#comment-44896</link>
		<dc:creator>uncle joe mccarthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media-criticism/oreilly-out-of-line-again/#comment-44896</guid>
		<description>last year, lufa boy purposefully mistated facts from ww2 on not one but two occasions, making him look like a nazi sympathizer

he never apologized, nor was he sanctioned

and there was a coordinated email effort at that time too.

you want to get at lufa boy? fire off emails with the clip to his radio and tv advertisers....same as spocko did with ksfo

do not threaten a boycott....just do it to inform the advertisers as to what their products are now associated with...an individual who believes that a child would prefer being raped over years than to be in a loving home

and as to those in this thread who feel that lufa boy is simply a commentator/celebrity....bull hockeys

he is an evil perv who likes to sexually harrass women, &quot;cuz they like it&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>last year, lufa boy purposefully mistated facts from ww2 on not one but two occasions, making him look like a nazi sympathizer</p>
<p>he never apologized, nor was he sanctioned</p>
<p>and there was a coordinated email effort at that time too.</p>
<p>you want to get at lufa boy? fire off emails with the clip to his radio and tv advertisers&#8230;.same as spocko did with ksfo</p>
<p>do not threaten a boycott&#8230;.just do it to inform the advertisers as to what their products are now associated with&#8230;an individual who believes that a child would prefer being raped over years than to be in a loving home</p>
<p>and as to those in this thread who feel that lufa boy is simply a commentator/celebrity&#8230;.bull hockeys</p>
<p>he is an evil perv who likes to sexually harrass women, &#8220;cuz they like it&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10349/oreilly-out-of-line-again/comment-page-1/#comment-44895</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media-criticism/oreilly-out-of-line-again/#comment-44895</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, the blog author being quoted does himself no favors:
&lt;blockquote&gt;This guy is the face of the Republican Party&lt;/blockquote&gt;
O&#039;Reilly has not been nominated or elected into ANY Republican Party office.  The attempt to hold the entire Republican Party responsible for everything O&#039;Reilly chooses to do is irresponsible at best and is almost certainly an indicator of extreme partisanship and lack of credibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, the blog author being quoted does himself no favors:</p>
<blockquote><p>This guy is the face of the Republican Party</p></blockquote>
<p>O&#8217;Reilly has not been nominated or elected into ANY Republican Party office.  The attempt to hold the entire Republican Party responsible for everything O&#8217;Reilly chooses to do is irresponsible at best and is almost certainly an indicator of extreme partisanship and lack of credibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SurgeJack</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10349/oreilly-out-of-line-again/comment-page-1/#comment-44894</link>
		<dc:creator>SurgeJack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media-criticism/oreilly-out-of-line-again/#comment-44894</guid>
		<description>Honestly, for all your moral convictions folks, it seems that Rush Limbaugh getting stopped over Viagra or some&#039;at like this seems to overwhelm all of it. It seems anything like this suddenly spurs a moral conviction you never thought you had. I just don&#039;t know how folks can keep a straight face when saying &#039;this is appalling&#039;, while looking at the things they&#039;ve posted &#039;reasonably&#039; about. It&#039;s appalling if you&#039;ve never seen it, but to up the moral ante just to trick yourself into making this novel or a cause for moral warfare greater than you&#039;ve encountered to say that you matter in some small way is ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, for all your moral convictions folks, it seems that Rush Limbaugh getting stopped over Viagra or some&#8217;at like this seems to overwhelm all of it. It seems anything like this suddenly spurs a moral conviction you never thought you had. I just don&#8217;t know how folks can keep a straight face when saying &#8216;this is appalling&#8217;, while looking at the things they&#8217;ve posted &#8216;reasonably&#8217; about. It&#8217;s appalling if you&#8217;ve never seen it, but to up the moral ante just to trick yourself into making this novel or a cause for moral warfare greater than you&#8217;ve encountered to say that you matter in some small way is ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SurgeJack</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10349/oreilly-out-of-line-again/comment-page-1/#comment-44892</link>
		<dc:creator>SurgeJack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/media-criticism/oreilly-out-of-line-again/#comment-44892</guid>
		<description>Leave O&#039;Reilly alone. He&#039;s a news commentator. Isn&#039;t there a more important thing you can put up as a headline than a hypothetical push for career assassination? First, his career ain&#039;t going to be over. Second, it might be worth re-assessing the ability of folks to find an incident like this from someone they despise, and blow it up in an effort to derail them. 

Why do it? It undermines the integrity of the thing you actually despise them for. This is an incident with a child and a kidnapping victim and to play it up in an effort to make it seem possible that you can get O&#039;Reilly off his program is ridiculous. All you&#039;re doing is giving him some added publicity while bolstering a sense of self-importance.

If you want to fight O&#039;Reilly, there&#039;s plenty of things you can fight him on. He&#039;s a celebrity, whose existence spurs on idolatry, desired or otherwise. There&#039;s a great resevoir of things you could find issue with him on. However, to pull this, which won&#039;t amount to anything, is to detract things that might actually be worth giving a darn about if you were thusly inclined.

But, I guess there&#039;s more important things, like Fox News Commentators or Rosie fighting with Donald Trump. At least if you&#039;re going to pretend to have an influence in something, pretend to have an influence in something that matters in the least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leave O&#8217;Reilly alone. He&#8217;s a news commentator. Isn&#8217;t there a more important thing you can put up as a headline than a hypothetical push for career assassination? First, his career ain&#8217;t going to be over. Second, it might be worth re-assessing the ability of folks to find an incident like this from someone they despise, and blow it up in an effort to derail them. </p>
<p>Why do it? It undermines the integrity of the thing you actually despise them for. This is an incident with a child and a kidnapping victim and to play it up in an effort to make it seem possible that you can get O&#8217;Reilly off his program is ridiculous. All you&#8217;re doing is giving him some added publicity while bolstering a sense of self-importance.</p>
<p>If you want to fight O&#8217;Reilly, there&#8217;s plenty of things you can fight him on. He&#8217;s a celebrity, whose existence spurs on idolatry, desired or otherwise. There&#8217;s a great resevoir of things you could find issue with him on. However, to pull this, which won&#8217;t amount to anything, is to detract things that might actually be worth giving a darn about if you were thusly inclined.</p>
<p>But, I guess there&#8217;s more important things, like Fox News Commentators or Rosie fighting with Donald Trump. At least if you&#8217;re going to pretend to have an influence in something, pretend to have an influence in something that matters in the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

