
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wiretaps moved to Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/10335/wiretaps-moved-to-foreign-intelligence-surveillance-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10335/wiretaps-moved-to-foreign-intelligence-surveillance-court/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 22:49:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Ritter</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10335/wiretaps-moved-to-foreign-intelligence-surveillance-court/comment-page-1/#comment-44752</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Ritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/law-legal-matters/wiretaps-moved-to-foreign-intelligence-surveillance-court/#comment-44752</guid>
		<description>OK- Tully- a year ago then. They seemed to go out of their way to court controversy -Pardon my pun. As with so many things with the Bush administration, it could have and should have been handled so much better. After all, they caved in to the court system in the end, so they must have known all along their argument was weak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK- Tully- a year ago then. They seemed to go out of their way to court controversy -Pardon my pun. As with so many things with the Bush administration, it could have and should have been handled so much better. After all, they caved in to the court system in the end, so they must have known all along their argument was weak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davebo</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10335/wiretaps-moved-to-foreign-intelligence-surveillance-court/comment-page-1/#comment-44688</link>
		<dc:creator>Davebo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 03:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/law-legal-matters/wiretaps-moved-to-foreign-intelligence-surveillance-court/#comment-44688</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Previously FISC had refused to amend their procedures to meet the needs of modern terrorist surveillance, so the admin stepped around FISC using war powers. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Really?  Where did you hear this?

And what war powers?  Article 2?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Previously FISC had refused to amend their procedures to meet the needs of modern terrorist surveillance, so the admin stepped around FISC using war powers. </p></blockquote>
<p>Really?  Where did you hear this?</p>
<p>And what war powers?  Article 2?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tully</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10335/wiretaps-moved-to-foreign-intelligence-surveillance-court/comment-page-1/#comment-44687</link>
		<dc:creator>Tully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 03:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/law-legal-matters/wiretaps-moved-to-foreign-intelligence-surveillance-court/#comment-44687</guid>
		<description>Oh, and FISA processes and procedures aren&#039;t classified, only actual operations. The processes and procedures, the &quot;forms,&quot; are set by published statute. It&#039;s not until you hit actual cases that classification applies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and FISA processes and procedures aren&#8217;t classified, only actual operations. The processes and procedures, the &#8220;forms,&#8221; are set by published statute. It&#8217;s not until you hit actual cases that classification applies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tully</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10335/wiretaps-moved-to-foreign-intelligence-surveillance-court/comment-page-1/#comment-44686</link>
		<dc:creator>Tully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 03:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/law-legal-matters/wiretaps-moved-to-foreign-intelligence-surveillance-court/#comment-44686</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t referring to FISA, Paul, but to the TSP. Previously FISC had refused to amend their procedures to meet the needs of modern terrorist surveillance, so the admin stepped around FISC using war powers. Now apparently the FISC and the admin have reached an agreement on procedural streamlining, so a step-around is no longer required. 

Or maybe outing the program rendered it useless, and there was no reason to not put it under FISC anymore. More likely a bit of both. We&#039;ll likely not get the real story until around the time we have grandkids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t referring to FISA, Paul, but to the TSP. Previously FISC had refused to amend their procedures to meet the needs of modern terrorist surveillance, so the admin stepped around FISC using war powers. Now apparently the FISC and the admin have reached an agreement on procedural streamlining, so a step-around is no longer required. </p>
<p>Or maybe outing the program rendered it useless, and there was no reason to not put it under FISC anymore. More likely a bit of both. We&#8217;ll likely not get the real story until around the time we have grandkids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Silver</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10335/wiretaps-moved-to-foreign-intelligence-surveillance-court/comment-page-1/#comment-44677</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Silver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 01:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/law-legal-matters/wiretaps-moved-to-foreign-intelligence-surveillance-court/#comment-44677</guid>
		<description>Tully,
I thought FISA processes were classified?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tully,<br />
I thought FISA processes were classified?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tully</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10335/wiretaps-moved-to-foreign-intelligence-surveillance-court/comment-page-1/#comment-44674</link>
		<dc:creator>Tully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 00:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/law-legal-matters/wiretaps-moved-to-foreign-intelligence-surveillance-court/#comment-44674</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Why didnâ€™t they just say they would work with the court two years ago&lt;/em&gt;

Because two years ago the program was still secret, and still producing results because it had yet to be splashed all over the front page of the New York Times? 

Duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Why didnâ€™t they just say they would work with the court two years ago</em></p>
<p>Because two years ago the program was still secret, and still producing results because it had yet to be splashed all over the front page of the New York Times? </p>
<p>Duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Ritter</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10335/wiretaps-moved-to-foreign-intelligence-surveillance-court/comment-page-1/#comment-44660</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Ritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/law-legal-matters/wiretaps-moved-to-foreign-intelligence-surveillance-court/#comment-44660</guid>
		<description>Soooooooo, after all of the rhetoric, these cases are going back to the FISA court. Why didn&#039;t they just say they would work with the court two years ago, instead of trying to appear like the president was above the law? Misplaced arrogance that really hurt the administration&#039;s cause in the long run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soooooooo, after all of the rhetoric, these cases are going back to the FISA court. Why didn&#8217;t they just say they would work with the court two years ago, instead of trying to appear like the president was above the law? Misplaced arrogance that really hurt the administration&#8217;s cause in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike P.</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10335/wiretaps-moved-to-foreign-intelligence-surveillance-court/comment-page-1/#comment-44643</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 21:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/law-legal-matters/wiretaps-moved-to-foreign-intelligence-surveillance-court/#comment-44643</guid>
		<description>The house of cards is wobbling, and a nor&#039;easter is headed for Pennsylvania Ave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The house of cards is wobbling, and a nor&#8217;easter is headed for Pennsylvania Ave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davebo</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10335/wiretaps-moved-to-foreign-intelligence-surveillance-court/comment-page-1/#comment-44618</link>
		<dc:creator>Davebo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/law-legal-matters/wiretaps-moved-to-foreign-intelligence-surveillance-court/#comment-44618</guid>
		<description>Pretty convenient timing wouldn&#039;t you say?

Doesn&#039;t Gonzales testify to congress tomorrow?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty convenient timing wouldn&#8217;t you say?</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t Gonzales testify to congress tomorrow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

