
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: There May Be Some Posting Problems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/10231/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10231/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 19:41:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicrivera</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10231/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-45733</link>
		<dc:creator>nicrivera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 20:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/blogging/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/#comment-45733</guid>
		<description>The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/19/AR2006071900524.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bill&lt;/a&gt; that president Bush vetoed last summer was for</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/19/AR2006071900524.html" rel="nofollow">bill</a> that president Bush vetoed last summer was for</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicrivera</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10231/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-45732</link>
		<dc:creator>nicrivera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 20:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/blogging/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/#comment-45732</guid>
		<description>The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/19/AR2006071900524.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bill&lt;/a&gt; that president Bush vetoed last summer was for &lt;strong&gt;federally- funded&lt;/strong&gt; embryonic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/19/AR2006071900524.html" rel="nofollow">bill</a> that president Bush vetoed last summer was for <strong>federally- funded</strong> embryonic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicrivera</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10231/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-45731</link>
		<dc:creator>nicrivera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 20:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/blogging/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/#comment-45731</guid>
		<description>The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/19/AR2006071900524.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bill&lt;/a&gt; that president Bush vetoed last summer was for &lt;strong&gt;federally- funded&lt;/strong&gt; embryonic stem cell research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/19/AR2006071900524.html" rel="nofollow">bill</a> that president Bush vetoed last summer was for <strong>federally- funded</strong> embryonic stem cell research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicrivera</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10231/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-45730</link>
		<dc:creator>nicrivera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 20:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/blogging/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/#comment-45730</guid>
		<description>Personally, I support stem cell research.  I don&#039;t think science should be held back by a bunch of religious ideologues.

But having said that, I think the stem research debate as been distorted by some of its proponents.  Indeed, there are Americans who oppose embryonic stem cell research on religious grounds, but that fails to tell the entire side of the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I support stem cell research.  I don&#8217;t think science should be held back by a bunch of religious ideologues.</p>
<p>But having said that, I think the stem research debate as been distorted by some of its proponents.  Indeed, there are Americans who oppose embryonic stem cell research on religious grounds, but that fails to tell the entire side of the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicrivera</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10231/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-45729</link>
		<dc:creator>nicrivera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 20:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/blogging/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/#comment-45729</guid>
		<description>Personally, I support stem cell research.  I don&#039;t think science should be held back by a bunch of religious ideologues.

But having said that, I think the stem research debate as been distorted by some of its proponents.  Indeed, there are Americans who oppose embryonic stem cell research on religious grounds, but that fails to tell the entire side of the story.  The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/19/AR2006071900524.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bill&lt;/a&gt; that president Bush vetoed last summer as for &lt;strong&gt;federally funded&lt;/strong&gt; embryonic stem cell research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I support stem cell research.  I don&#8217;t think science should be held back by a bunch of religious ideologues.</p>
<p>But having said that, I think the stem research debate as been distorted by some of its proponents.  Indeed, there are Americans who oppose embryonic stem cell research on religious grounds, but that fails to tell the entire side of the story.  The <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/19/AR2006071900524.html" rel="nofollow">bill</a> that president Bush vetoed last summer as for <strong>federally funded</strong> embryonic stem cell research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicrivera</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10231/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-45728</link>
		<dc:creator>nicrivera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 20:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/blogging/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/#comment-45728</guid>
		<description>Personally, I support stem cell research.  I don&#039;t think science should be held back by a bunch of religious ideologues.

But having said that, I think the stem research debate as been distorted by some of its proponents.  Indeed, there are Americans who oppose embryonic stem cell research on religious grounds, but that fails to tell the entire side of the story.  The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/19/AR2006071900524.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bill&lt;/a&gt; that president Bush vetoed last summer as for &lt;strong&gt;federally funded&lt;/strong&gt; embryonic stem cell research.  It had nothing to do with privately funded embryonic stem cell research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I support stem cell research.  I don&#8217;t think science should be held back by a bunch of religious ideologues.</p>
<p>But having said that, I think the stem research debate as been distorted by some of its proponents.  Indeed, there are Americans who oppose embryonic stem cell research on religious grounds, but that fails to tell the entire side of the story.  The <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/19/AR2006071900524.html" rel="nofollow">bill</a> that president Bush vetoed last summer as for <strong>federally funded</strong> embryonic stem cell research.  It had nothing to do with privately funded embryonic stem cell research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicrivera</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10231/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-45727</link>
		<dc:creator>nicrivera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 20:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/blogging/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/#comment-45727</guid>
		<description>Personally, I support stem cell research.  I don&#039;t think science should be held back by a bunch of religious ideologues.

But having said that, I think the stem research debate as been distorted by some of its proponents.  Indeed, there are Americans who oppose embryonic stem cell research on religious grounds, but that fails to tell the entire side of the story.  The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/19/AR2006071900524.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bill&lt;/a&gt; that president Bush vetoed last summer as for &lt;strong&gt;federally funded&lt;/strong&gt; embryonic stem cell research.  It had nothing to do with privately funded embryonic stem cell research.  So it&#039;s disingenuous for us to argue about stem cell research as if it were simply a ban on all embryonic stem cell research.  It is not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I support stem cell research.  I don&#8217;t think science should be held back by a bunch of religious ideologues.</p>
<p>But having said that, I think the stem research debate as been distorted by some of its proponents.  Indeed, there are Americans who oppose embryonic stem cell research on religious grounds, but that fails to tell the entire side of the story.  The <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/19/AR2006071900524.html" rel="nofollow">bill</a> that president Bush vetoed last summer as for <strong>federally funded</strong> embryonic stem cell research.  It had nothing to do with privately funded embryonic stem cell research.  So it&#8217;s disingenuous for us to argue about stem cell research as if it were simply a ban on all embryonic stem cell research.  It is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicrivera</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10231/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-45726</link>
		<dc:creator>nicrivera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 20:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/blogging/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/#comment-45726</guid>
		<description>Personally, I support stem cell research.  I don&#039;t think science should be held back by a bunch of religious ideologues.

But having said that, I think the stem research debate as been distorted by some of its proponents.  Indeed, there are Americans who oppose embryonic stem cell research on religious grounds, but that fails to tell the entire side of the story.  The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/19/AR2006071900524.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bill&lt;/a&gt; that president Bush vetoed last summer as for &lt;strong&gt;federally funded&lt;/strong&gt; embryonic stem cell research.  It had nothing to do with privately funded embryonic stem cell research.  So it&#039;s disingenuous for us to argue about stem cell research as if it were simply a ban on all embryonic stem cell research.  It is not.

I think it is unfair to relegate anyone who opposes embryonic stem cell research to the &quot;extremist&quot; wing of the Republican Party.  Many libertarians and conservatives oppose federally-funded embryonic stem cell research not because they object to this research in general, but because they don&#039;t believe this research should be paid for the federal taxpayer dollars and/or they don&#039;t believe federally-funded embryonic stem cell research is constitutional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I support stem cell research.  I don&#8217;t think science should be held back by a bunch of religious ideologues.</p>
<p>But having said that, I think the stem research debate as been distorted by some of its proponents.  Indeed, there are Americans who oppose embryonic stem cell research on religious grounds, but that fails to tell the entire side of the story.  The <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/19/AR2006071900524.html" rel="nofollow">bill</a> that president Bush vetoed last summer as for <strong>federally funded</strong> embryonic stem cell research.  It had nothing to do with privately funded embryonic stem cell research.  So it&#8217;s disingenuous for us to argue about stem cell research as if it were simply a ban on all embryonic stem cell research.  It is not.</p>
<p>I think it is unfair to relegate anyone who opposes embryonic stem cell research to the &#8220;extremist&#8221; wing of the Republican Party.  Many libertarians and conservatives oppose federally-funded embryonic stem cell research not because they object to this research in general, but because they don&#8217;t believe this research should be paid for the federal taxpayer dollars and/or they don&#8217;t believe federally-funded embryonic stem cell research is constitutional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicrivera</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10231/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-45724</link>
		<dc:creator>nicrivera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 20:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/blogging/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/#comment-45724</guid>
		<description>Personally, I support stem cell research.  I don&#039;t think science should be held back by a bunch of religious ideologues.

But having said that, I think the stem research debate as been distorted by some of its proponents.  Indeed, there are Americans who oppose embryonic stem cell research on religious grounds, but that fails to tell the entire side of the story.  The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/19/AR2006071900524.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bill&lt;/a&gt; that president Bush vetoed last summer as for &lt;strong&gt;federally funded&lt;/strong&gt; embryonic stem cell research.  It had nothing to do with privately funded embryonic stem cell research.  So it&#039;s disingenuous for us to argue about stem cell research as if it were simply a ban on all embryonic stem cell research.  It is not.

I think it is unfair to relegate anyone who opposes embryonic stem cell research to the &quot;extremist&quot; wing of the Republican Party.  Many libertarians and conservatives oppose federally-funded embryonic stem cell research not because they object to this research in general, but because they don&#039;t believe this research should be paid for the federal taxpayer dollars and/or they don&#039;t believe federally-funded embryonic stem cell research is constitutional.

Some of you might disagree with this argument every bit as much as you do with the argument that opposes embryonic stem cell research for religious reasons.  That is certainly your right.  I just think we ought not to pretend that all opponents to embryonic stem cell research are right-wing extremists.

Many people regard embryonic stem cell research the same way they regard abortion.  They&#039;re pro-choice in that they feel it should be legal and restrictions on it should be kept to a bare minimum, yet they also feel that government should not be funding it.

As I said before, I recognize that there are Americans who oppose embryonic stem cell research on religious grounds and would prefer to ban it outright (Brownback might very well be among them).  However, it would be a mistake to believe that this is position of &lt;strong&gt;all&lt;/strong&gt; opponents of embryonic stem cell research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I support stem cell research.  I don&#8217;t think science should be held back by a bunch of religious ideologues.</p>
<p>But having said that, I think the stem research debate as been distorted by some of its proponents.  Indeed, there are Americans who oppose embryonic stem cell research on religious grounds, but that fails to tell the entire side of the story.  The <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/19/AR2006071900524.html" rel="nofollow">bill</a> that president Bush vetoed last summer as for <strong>federally funded</strong> embryonic stem cell research.  It had nothing to do with privately funded embryonic stem cell research.  So it&#8217;s disingenuous for us to argue about stem cell research as if it were simply a ban on all embryonic stem cell research.  It is not.</p>
<p>I think it is unfair to relegate anyone who opposes embryonic stem cell research to the &#8220;extremist&#8221; wing of the Republican Party.  Many libertarians and conservatives oppose federally-funded embryonic stem cell research not because they object to this research in general, but because they don&#8217;t believe this research should be paid for the federal taxpayer dollars and/or they don&#8217;t believe federally-funded embryonic stem cell research is constitutional.</p>
<p>Some of you might disagree with this argument every bit as much as you do with the argument that opposes embryonic stem cell research for religious reasons.  That is certainly your right.  I just think we ought not to pretend that all opponents to embryonic stem cell research are right-wing extremists.</p>
<p>Many people regard embryonic stem cell research the same way they regard abortion.  They&#8217;re pro-choice in that they feel it should be legal and restrictions on it should be kept to a bare minimum, yet they also feel that government should not be funding it.</p>
<p>As I said before, I recognize that there are Americans who oppose embryonic stem cell research on religious grounds and would prefer to ban it outright (Brownback might very well be among them).  However, it would be a mistake to believe that this is position of <strong>all</strong> opponents of embryonic stem cell research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicrivera</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10231/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-45723</link>
		<dc:creator>nicrivera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 20:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/blogging/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/#comment-45723</guid>
		<description>There may also my problems with posting comments that never seem to show up.  That&#039;s why I&#039;m posting a comment here (as a test).  Website administrators, please feel free to delete this comment.

**************************************************************

&lt;em&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Wherever the GOPâ€™s â€œheartâ€? is, Brownback will run as the truest of true social conservatives: â€œI am a conservative and Iâ€™m proud to be a conservative.â€? Sure, if conservative is defined as extremism on abortion, stem-cell research, and other wedge issues. That is, if itâ€™s defined by the religious right.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/em&gt;

OK, so I&#039;ve got somewhat a beef to pick with the stem-cell research comment in this post and many previous posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There may also my problems with posting comments that never seem to show up.  That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m posting a comment here (as a test).  Website administrators, please feel free to delete this comment.</p>
<p>**************************************************************</p>
<p><em><br />
<blockquote>Wherever the GOPâ€™s â€œheartâ€? is, Brownback will run as the truest of true social conservatives: â€œI am a conservative and Iâ€™m proud to be a conservative.â€? Sure, if conservative is defined as extremism on abortion, stem-cell research, and other wedge issues. That is, if itâ€™s defined by the religious right.</p></blockquote>
<p></em></p>
<p>OK, so I&#8217;ve got somewhat a beef to pick with the stem-cell research comment in this post and many previous posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CStanley</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10231/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-42951</link>
		<dc:creator>CStanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/blogging/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/#comment-42951</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;â€œTHIS MAKES ME SICK.â€?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Haha...Wordpress= &quot;HAL&quot;?
&quot;Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer, do...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>â€œTHIS MAKES ME SICK.â€?</p></blockquote>
<p>Haha&#8230;Wordpress= &#8220;HAL&#8221;?<br />
&#8220;Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer, do&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gray</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10231/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-42946</link>
		<dc:creator>Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/blogging/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/#comment-42946</guid>
		<description>â€œTHIS MAKES ME SICK.â€?

Hehehe Joe!

I suspect this is what you get for letting MvdG handle the system!
:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>â€œTHIS MAKES ME SICK.â€?</p>
<p>Hehehe Joe!</p>
<p>I suspect this is what you get for letting MvdG handle the system!<br />
 <img src='http://themoderatevoice.com/wordpress-engine/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Gandelman</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10231/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-42933</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Gandelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/blogging/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/#comment-42933</guid>
		<description>Actually, the main technical glitch was everytime I tried to post something serious WordPress gave me a message saying: &quot;THIS MAKES ME SICK.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the main technical glitch was everytime I tried to post something serious WordPress gave me a message saying: &#8220;THIS MAKES ME SICK.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gray</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10231/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-42904</link>
		<dc:creator>Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/blogging/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/#comment-42904</guid>
		<description>&quot;I went in and edited your comment. in the one you used italics you forgot to finish by publish a slash in front of it.&quot;

Still, kind of strange. Almost all forum or comment thread programs prevent formatting from &#039;spilling&#039; out of comments by simply adding /a (as a tag) after each post...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I went in and edited your comment. in the one you used italics you forgot to finish by publish a slash in front of it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Still, kind of strange. Almost all forum or comment thread programs prevent formatting from &#8216;spilling&#8217; out of comments by simply adding /a (as a tag) after each post&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CStanley</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10231/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-42903</link>
		<dc:creator>CStanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/blogging/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/#comment-42903</guid>
		<description>Gray,
I wasn&#039;t really directing that comment toward you in particular, just that I saw Michael explaining a more laborious method of using the quicktag buttons (click, type and then click on close tags) which is also more prone to error. Thought it might be helpful to other users who might not realize there&#039;s an easier way, esp with links, to do this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gray,<br />
I wasn&#8217;t really directing that comment toward you in particular, just that I saw Michael explaining a more laborious method of using the quicktag buttons (click, type and then click on close tags) which is also more prone to error. Thought it might be helpful to other users who might not realize there&#8217;s an easier way, esp with links, to do this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gray</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10231/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-42901</link>
		<dc:creator>Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/blogging/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/#comment-42901</guid>
		<description>&quot;This didnâ€™t take me too much time but Iâ€™m also studying, so I will be off now.&quot;

Good job, Michael! Have a nice day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This didnâ€™t take me too much time but Iâ€™m also studying, so I will be off now.&#8221;</p>
<p>Good job, Michael! Have a nice day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gray</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10231/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-42899</link>
		<dc:creator>Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/blogging/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/#comment-42899</guid>
		<description>I know, I know, CS. Just used italic tags in that comment out of habit. But the buttons are really more convenient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know, I know, CS. Just used italic tags in that comment out of habit. But the buttons are really more convenient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gray</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10231/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-42898</link>
		<dc:creator>Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/blogging/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/#comment-42898</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I went in and edited your comment in the one you used italics you forgot to finish by publish a slash in front of it.&lt;/em&gt;

Damn, got me! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I went in and edited your comment in the one you used italics you forgot to finish by publish a slash in front of it.</em></p>
<p>Damn, got me! <img src='http://themoderatevoice.com/wordpress-engine/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CStanley</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10231/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-42896</link>
		<dc:creator>CStanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/blogging/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/#comment-42896</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to point out an easier way to use the idiot buttons. Just highlight with your mouse whatever text you want to include between the tags (whatever you want to appear in bold, italics, etc) and then click on the appropriate button. Viola!

Works with links too: Type in the text that you want to appear in the post (like the title of the article, or &quot;this article&quot; or &quot;LINK here&quot;) and highlight it. Then click the link button and a popup window will allow you to type or paste in the URL.

The good part about doing it this way is that you can&#039;t forget to close the tags because it&#039;s all done for you :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to point out an easier way to use the idiot buttons. Just highlight with your mouse whatever text you want to include between the tags (whatever you want to appear in bold, italics, etc) and then click on the appropriate button. Viola!</p>
<p>Works with links too: Type in the text that you want to appear in the post (like the title of the article, or &#8220;this article&#8221; or &#8220;LINK here&#8221;) and highlight it. Then click the link button and a popup window will allow you to type or paste in the URL.</p>
<p>The good part about doing it this way is that you can&#8217;t forget to close the tags because it&#8217;s all done for you <img src='http://themoderatevoice.com/wordpress-engine/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael van der Galien</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10231/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-42895</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael van der Galien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/blogging/there-may-be-some-posting-problems/#comment-42895</guid>
		<description>lol yes Gray. I went in and edited your comment. in the one you used italics you forgot to finish by publish a slash in front of it.

Anyway, I &lt;em&gt;think&lt;/em&gt; I fixed the problems you were having. This didn&#039;t take me too much time but I&#039;m also studying, so I will be off now. If more problems, just e-mail me or Joe or leave a comment in &lt;em&gt;this&lt;/em&gt; thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol yes Gray. I went in and edited your comment. in the one you used italics you forgot to finish by publish a slash in front of it.</p>
<p>Anyway, I <em>think</em> I fixed the problems you were having. This didn&#8217;t take me too much time but I&#8217;m also studying, so I will be off now. If more problems, just e-mail me or Joe or leave a comment in <em>this</em> thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

