<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Americans want</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/10210/what-americans-want/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10210/what-americans-want/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:04:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kim Ritter</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10210/what-americans-want/comment-page-1/#comment-43235</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Ritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 05:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/11/politics/what-americans-want/#comment-43235</guid>
		<description>I agree that many Iraqis are vulnerable because they have helped us, or risked their lives to support the government. It may be impossible to forestall a civil war that they are so determined to fight. Why are so few independent experts giving this plan any credence? Most retired military or former administration officials see this as a political ploy- not  a military one. Its hard to take it seriously when there are no spelled out consequences for Maliki if he fails to live up to his promises. Its hard to take it seriously when Abizaid, Casey and the JCS have come out against it. Its chief proponent has failed miserably in strategizing this war, but we have his word that it might work. That&#039;s not a lot to go on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that many Iraqis are vulnerable because they have helped us, or risked their lives to support the government. It may be impossible to forestall a civil war that they are so determined to fight. Why are so few independent experts giving this plan any credence? Most retired military or former administration officials see this as a political ploy- not  a military one. Its hard to take it seriously when there are no spelled out consequences for Maliki if he fails to live up to his promises. Its hard to take it seriously when Abizaid, Casey and the JCS have come out against it. Its chief proponent has failed miserably in strategizing this war, but we have his word that it might work. That&#8217;s not a lot to go on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10210/what-americans-want/comment-page-1/#comment-43143</link>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/11/politics/what-americans-want/#comment-43143</guid>
		<description>Like it or not, Americaâ€™s obligations to the Iraqi people havenâ€™t gone away just because weâ€™re sick of George Bush.

America must do her utmost to leave the Iraqis in a viable situation.  Itâ€™s bad enough that 50-100,000 Iraqis are dead - how many more will be murdered if we leave?

Only when and if it becomes obvious that there is no chance of success can we abandon them.  That point hasnâ€™t been reached.  On the contrary, the truth is that we havenâ€™t really given it our best effort yet.  At no time have we committed anywhere near the number of the troops to Iraq as were in theater during the first Gulf War.  If we had we wouldnâ€™t be in this situation now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like it or not, Americaâ€™s obligations to the Iraqi people havenâ€™t gone away just because weâ€™re sick of George Bush.</p>
<p>America must do her utmost to leave the Iraqis in a viable situation.  Itâ€™s bad enough that 50-100,000 Iraqis are dead &#8211; how many more will be murdered if we leave?</p>
<p>Only when and if it becomes obvious that there is no chance of success can we abandon them.  That point hasnâ€™t been reached.  On the contrary, the truth is that we havenâ€™t really given it our best effort yet.  At no time have we committed anywhere near the number of the troops to Iraq as were in theater during the first Gulf War.  If we had we wouldnâ€™t be in this situation now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Ritter</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10210/what-americans-want/comment-page-1/#comment-42795</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Ritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 04:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/11/politics/what-americans-want/#comment-42795</guid>
		<description>Casey L- They tell the gold-star families that they&#039;re doing it so that their son or daughter&#039;s death was not in vain- wouldn&#039;t they have wanted the mission to be completed??? Another abhorrent tactic. What no one has addressed- I guess because they can&#039;t face it is- what do we do in 3 months or so when this has resulted in many more US casualties, and Baghdad is no more secure than it is today? Declare victory and go home???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Casey L- They tell the gold-star families that they&#8217;re doing it so that their son or daughter&#8217;s death was not in vain- wouldn&#8217;t they have wanted the mission to be completed??? Another abhorrent tactic. What no one has addressed- I guess because they can&#8217;t face it is- what do we do in 3 months or so when this has resulted in many more US casualties, and Baghdad is no more secure than it is today? Declare victory and go home???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaseyL</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10210/what-americans-want/comment-page-1/#comment-42787</link>
		<dc:creator>CaseyL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 03:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/11/politics/what-americans-want/#comment-42787</guid>
		<description>I am opposed to losing any more US soldiers for the sake of someone&#039;s &quot;hoping&quot; for a better outcome.

The idea that it&#039;s OK to send another few thousand soldiers into the meat grinder so you can &quot;keep hoping&quot; is so repugnant I don&#039;t have words for it.

Go tell the gold-star families how much you need to keep hoping.  Maybe they&#039;ll have the right words for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am opposed to losing any more US soldiers for the sake of someone&#8217;s &#8220;hoping&#8221; for a better outcome.</p>
<p>The idea that it&#8217;s OK to send another few thousand soldiers into the meat grinder so you can &#8220;keep hoping&#8221; is so repugnant I don&#8217;t have words for it.</p>
<p>Go tell the gold-star families how much you need to keep hoping.  Maybe they&#8217;ll have the right words for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rambie</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10210/what-americans-want/comment-page-1/#comment-42764</link>
		<dc:creator>Rambie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/11/politics/what-americans-want/#comment-42764</guid>
		<description>htom: &lt;em&gt;...then lost the peace by withdrawing all aid from the government weâ€™d formed.&lt;/em&gt; 

Which &quot;peace&quot; are you referring too, either then or now?  There wasn&#039;t any real peace in Vietnam and there sure isn&#039;t any in Iraq now.


&quot;Between the signing of the 1973 Paris Peace Accord and late 1974 both antagonists [North &amp; South Vietnam] had been satisfied with minor land-grabbing operations. The North Vietnamese, however, were growing impatient with the Thieu regime, which remained intransigent as to the called-for national reunification. Hanoi also remained wary that the U.S. would, once again, support its former ally if larger operations were undertaken...  

By late 1974, the Politburo in Hanoi gave its permission for a limited VPA offensive out of Cambodia into Phuoc Long Province...&quot;  
&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnam_War&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; WIKI LINK&lt;/a&gt;

Continued offensives by the North finally led to the Fall of Saigon on April 30th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>htom: <em>&#8230;then lost the peace by withdrawing all aid from the government weâ€™d formed.</em> </p>
<p>Which &#8220;peace&#8221; are you referring too, either then or now?  There wasn&#8217;t any real peace in Vietnam and there sure isn&#8217;t any in Iraq now.</p>
<p>&#8220;Between the signing of the 1973 Paris Peace Accord and late 1974 both antagonists [North &amp; South Vietnam] had been satisfied with minor land-grabbing operations. The North Vietnamese, however, were growing impatient with the Thieu regime, which remained intransigent as to the called-for national reunification. Hanoi also remained wary that the U.S. would, once again, support its former ally if larger operations were undertaken&#8230;  </p>
<p>By late 1974, the Politburo in Hanoi gave its permission for a limited VPA offensive out of Cambodia into Phuoc Long Province&#8230;&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnam_War" rel="nofollow"> WIKI LINK</a></p>
<p>Continued offensives by the North finally led to the Fall of Saigon on April 30th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: htom</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10210/what-americans-want/comment-page-1/#comment-42760</link>
		<dc:creator>htom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/11/politics/what-americans-want/#comment-42760</guid>
		<description>The historical lesson to be learned from Vietnam. Hmmm. Military defeated the opponent, other than some who descended to terrorism, and we -- and the South Vietnamese and their allies -- then lost the peace by withdrawing all aid from the government we&#039;d formed. Millions then died. And the Democrats want to do it again. Worse, some of the Republicans do, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The historical lesson to be learned from Vietnam. Hmmm. Military defeated the opponent, other than some who descended to terrorism, and we &#8212; and the South Vietnamese and their allies &#8212; then lost the peace by withdrawing all aid from the government we&#8217;d formed. Millions then died. And the Democrats want to do it again. Worse, some of the Republicans do, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rambie</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10210/what-americans-want/comment-page-1/#comment-42744</link>
		<dc:creator>Rambie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/11/politics/what-americans-want/#comment-42744</guid>
		<description>Lynx: &quot;Bushâ€™s solution is pretending to do more, and then when that doesnâ€™t (and it wonâ€™t work), hopefully on the watch of the &lt;strong&gt;next president&lt;/strong&gt;&quot; (my emphasis no Lynx&#039;s)

Lynx, I think you&#039;re onto something.  President Bush wants the withdrawal to fall to the next administration so he can save-face and doesn&#039;t have to admit he was wrong.  Failing that he&#039;ll take leaving it up to the Dem-controlled Congress to force him, so he can save-face by blaming them for the &quot;failure&quot; of the Iraq war.

From over here in my little &#039;ol Red State, I sure looks like the GOP is just waiting for the Dems to force the withdraw from Iraq so they can use it for political gain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lynx: &#8220;Bushâ€™s solution is pretending to do more, and then when that doesnâ€™t (and it wonâ€™t work), hopefully on the watch of the <strong>next president</strong>&#8221; (my emphasis no Lynx&#8217;s)</p>
<p>Lynx, I think you&#8217;re onto something.  President Bush wants the withdrawal to fall to the next administration so he can save-face and doesn&#8217;t have to admit he was wrong.  Failing that he&#8217;ll take leaving it up to the Dem-controlled Congress to force him, so he can save-face by blaming them for the &#8220;failure&#8221; of the Iraq war.</p>
<p>From over here in my little &#8216;ol Red State, I sure looks like the GOP is just waiting for the Dems to force the withdraw from Iraq so they can use it for political gain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Ritter</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10210/what-americans-want/comment-page-1/#comment-42721</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Ritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/11/politics/what-americans-want/#comment-42721</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the big danger- falling prey to inspirational words that end up having little or nothing to do with how things eventually turn out. Probably no one would go to war without speeches like that, but I think we would have been better off ignoring JFK and GWB-the costs have greatly outweighed the benefits in Viet Nam and Iraq! Lets consider the probable consequences of our good intentions rather than some bloviator spouting inspirational rot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the big danger- falling prey to inspirational words that end up having little or nothing to do with how things eventually turn out. Probably no one would go to war without speeches like that, but I think we would have been better off ignoring JFK and GWB-the costs have greatly outweighed the benefits in Viet Nam and Iraq! Lets consider the probable consequences of our good intentions rather than some bloviator spouting inspirational rot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: egrubs</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10210/what-americans-want/comment-page-1/#comment-42712</link>
		<dc:creator>egrubs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/11/politics/what-americans-want/#comment-42712</guid>
		<description>(Oh and yeah. Thanks for Vietnam, Mr. President. How did that turn out? Perhaps one of those historical lessons is that this speech may have engendered and/or reflected policies that are directly to our disadvantage?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Oh and yeah. Thanks for Vietnam, Mr. President. How did that turn out? Perhaps one of those historical lessons is that this speech may have engendered and/or reflected policies that are directly to our disadvantage?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: egrubs</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10210/what-americans-want/comment-page-1/#comment-42711</link>
		<dc:creator>egrubs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/11/politics/what-americans-want/#comment-42711</guid>
		<description>Yay. I&#039;m convinced. More war. More blood. Let&#039;s nuke Iran and secure high-profit oil deals.

JFK just told me it was all worth it.

I find it hard to appreciate his nuanced understanding of modern-day Iraq and the middle east, of modern day America and our challenges, when his brain is in 5 pieces.

This. Is. Not. The. Cold. War.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay. I&#8217;m convinced. More war. More blood. Let&#8217;s nuke Iran and secure high-profit oil deals.</p>
<p>JFK just told me it was all worth it.</p>
<p>I find it hard to appreciate his nuanced understanding of modern-day Iraq and the middle east, of modern day America and our challenges, when his brain is in 5 pieces.</p>
<p>This. Is. Not. The. Cold. War.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: htom</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10210/what-americans-want/comment-page-1/#comment-42687</link>
		<dc:creator>htom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/11/politics/what-americans-want/#comment-42687</guid>
		<description>JFK said it well, at his inauguration
&lt;blockquote&gt;
...
We dare not forget today that we are the heirs of that first revolution. Let the word go forth from this time and place, to friend and foe alike, that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americansâ€”born in this century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our ancient heritageâ€”and unwilling to witness or permit the slow undoing of those human rights to which this Nation has always been committed, and to which we are committed today at home and around the world.
 Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and the success of liberty.
 This much we pledgeâ€”and more.
 To those old allies whose cultural and spiritual origins we share, we pledge the loyalty of faithful friends. United, there is little we cannot do in a host of cooperative ventures. Divided, there is little we can doâ€”for we dare not meet a powerful challenge at odds and split asunder.
 To those new States whom we welcome to the ranks of the free, we pledge our word that one form of colonial control shall not have passed away merely to be replaced by a far more iron tyranny. We shall not always expect to find them supporting our view. But we shall always hope to find them strongly supporting their own freedomâ€”and to remember that, in the past, those who foolishly sought power by riding the back of the tiger ended up inside.
 To those peoples in the huts and villages across the globe struggling to break the bonds of mass misery, we pledge our best efforts to help them help themselves, for whatever period is requiredâ€”not because the Communists may be doing it, not because we seek their votes, but because it is right. If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich.
...
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JFK said it well, at his inauguration</p>
<blockquote><p>
&#8230;<br />
We dare not forget today that we are the heirs of that first revolution. Let the word go forth from this time and place, to friend and foe alike, that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americansâ€”born in this century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our ancient heritageâ€”and unwilling to witness or permit the slow undoing of those human rights to which this Nation has always been committed, and to which we are committed today at home and around the world.<br />
 Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and the success of liberty.<br />
 This much we pledgeâ€”and more.<br />
 To those old allies whose cultural and spiritual origins we share, we pledge the loyalty of faithful friends. United, there is little we cannot do in a host of cooperative ventures. Divided, there is little we can doâ€”for we dare not meet a powerful challenge at odds and split asunder.<br />
 To those new States whom we welcome to the ranks of the free, we pledge our word that one form of colonial control shall not have passed away merely to be replaced by a far more iron tyranny. We shall not always expect to find them supporting our view. But we shall always hope to find them strongly supporting their own freedomâ€”and to remember that, in the past, those who foolishly sought power by riding the back of the tiger ended up inside.<br />
 To those peoples in the huts and villages across the globe struggling to break the bonds of mass misery, we pledge our best efforts to help them help themselves, for whatever period is requiredâ€”not because the Communists may be doing it, not because we seek their votes, but because it is right. If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich.<br />
&#8230;
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael van der Galien</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10210/what-americans-want/comment-page-1/#comment-42682</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael van der Galien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/11/politics/what-americans-want/#comment-42682</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I have no faith, but I can hope, that time â€” however much we can gain â€” will bring different scenarios.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

MLK said something beautiful about &lt;em&gt;time&lt;/em&gt; and our misconception of it in his &lt;em&gt;Letter from Birmingham Jail&lt;/em&gt;. 
&lt;blockquote&gt;Such an attitude stems from a tragic misconception of time, from the strangely rational notion that there is something in the very flow of time that will inevitably cure all ills. Actually, time itself is neutral; it can be used either destructively or constructively.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I have no faith, but I can hope, that time â€” however much we can gain â€” will bring different scenarios.</p></blockquote>
<p>MLK said something beautiful about <em>time</em> and our misconception of it in his <em>Letter from Birmingham Jail</em>. </p>
<blockquote><p>Such an attitude stems from a tragic misconception of time, from the strangely rational notion that there is something in the very flow of time that will inevitably cure all ills. Actually, time itself is neutral; it can be used either destructively or constructively.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truflo</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10210/what-americans-want/comment-page-1/#comment-42653</link>
		<dc:creator>truflo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/11/politics/what-americans-want/#comment-42653</guid>
		<description>CStanley,
Thanks for the direction to the captain&#039;s comment. Interesting, but what I am getting at is the sense that the Iraqi&#039;s themselves understand that the war has moved on and is now a battle to the end between Shia and Sunnis. The presence of US troops is of use to Sunnis because it acts as a giant recruitment poster. The Shia too are happy for the troops to stay as they can be manipulated into attacking Sunni insurgents. The end game will be brutal and drawn-out and no matter how we might wish it, America will have no say on what the final outcome looks like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CStanley,<br />
Thanks for the direction to the captain&#8217;s comment. Interesting, but what I am getting at is the sense that the Iraqi&#8217;s themselves understand that the war has moved on and is now a battle to the end between Shia and Sunnis. The presence of US troops is of use to Sunnis because it acts as a giant recruitment poster. The Shia too are happy for the troops to stay as they can be manipulated into attacking Sunni insurgents. The end game will be brutal and drawn-out and no matter how we might wish it, America will have no say on what the final outcome looks like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gray</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10210/what-americans-want/comment-page-1/#comment-42645</link>
		<dc:creator>Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/11/politics/what-americans-want/#comment-42645</guid>
		<description>&quot;You do know there is actually a movie director by the name of F. Gary Gray, right?&quot;

Actually no. Never heard of him. Had to google to find his films, and now I&#039;m surprised to read he made &#039;The Italian Job&#039;. Thx for mistaking me for him! I&#039;m feeling flattered. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You do know there is actually a movie director by the name of F. Gary Gray, right?&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually no. Never heard of him. Had to google to find his films, and now I&#8217;m surprised to read he made &#8216;The Italian Job&#8217;. Thx for mistaking me for him! I&#8217;m feeling flattered. <img src='http://themoderatevoice.com/wordpress-engine/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gray</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10210/what-americans-want/comment-page-1/#comment-42642</link>
		<dc:creator>Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/11/politics/what-americans-want/#comment-42642</guid>
		<description>&quot;the operation will be led on the Iraqi side primarily by Kurds. If true, that should make a difference.&quot;

Yes. For the kurds. After managing successfully to stay out of the struggle, and making their region in comparison an oasis of security and stability, this may be their first mayor mistake. Let&#039;s hope there won&#039;t be a backlash from the other parties because of this.

As for the Sunni and Shiite, I don&#039;t think they&#039;ll like Kurd patrols in their quarters any more than they would welcome troops from the opposite sect. So where&#039;s the big difference?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the operation will be led on the Iraqi side primarily by Kurds. If true, that should make a difference.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes. For the kurds. After managing successfully to stay out of the struggle, and making their region in comparison an oasis of security and stability, this may be their first mayor mistake. Let&#8217;s hope there won&#8217;t be a backlash from the other parties because of this.</p>
<p>As for the Sunni and Shiite, I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;ll like Kurd patrols in their quarters any more than they would welcome troops from the opposite sect. So where&#8217;s the big difference?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corvus</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10210/what-americans-want/comment-page-1/#comment-42640</link>
		<dc:creator>corvus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/11/politics/what-americans-want/#comment-42640</guid>
		<description>poor poliman

Your post reeks of desperation.
So now you support Bush because you think you have NO choice.
I have deep concerns for your psyche, when this plan fails which it will without any REAL diplomacy in the region. What will poliman do then? 

I&#039;m surprised you posted the following:

&lt;em&gt;If those militias and death squads â€œbelongedâ€? to the Iraqi government, Iâ€™d be less inclined to object here â€” but they donâ€™t. This assumption that Iraqis are deliberately and willfully allowing the murder and mayhem to continue on their streets out of sheer laziness is ludicrousâ€¦ and dangerous&lt;/em&gt;

When the audio from Saddams hanging clearly showed that Al-Sadr&#039;s supporters are at the highest levels of thr Iraqi government security forces. 

Please provide some facts to support your assertion that Iraqi government is not working with shiite militants and therefore supporting death squads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>poor poliman</p>
<p>Your post reeks of desperation.<br />
So now you support Bush because you think you have NO choice.<br />
I have deep concerns for your psyche, when this plan fails which it will without any REAL diplomacy in the region. What will poliman do then? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m surprised you posted the following:</p>
<p><em>If those militias and death squads â€œbelongedâ€? to the Iraqi government, Iâ€™d be less inclined to object here â€” but they donâ€™t. This assumption that Iraqis are deliberately and willfully allowing the murder and mayhem to continue on their streets out of sheer laziness is ludicrousâ€¦ and dangerous</em></p>
<p>When the audio from Saddams hanging clearly showed that Al-Sadr&#8217;s supporters are at the highest levels of thr Iraqi government security forces. </p>
<p>Please provide some facts to support your assertion that Iraqi government is not working with shiite militants and therefore supporting death squads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenDreams</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10210/what-americans-want/comment-page-1/#comment-42636</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenDreams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/11/politics/what-americans-want/#comment-42636</guid>
		<description>Winning over the locals. Indeed. The White House website gushes that Iraqi income has risen to ~$1500 a year. We have spent $70,000 per Iraqi family on this war. Put away the boy toys and the &quot;military options only&quot; thinking, and there are far more effective ways to &quot;win&quot; this &quot;war&quot;. What we&#039;ve spent so far, per family, is a lifetime income for most Iraqis. Hey, I&#039;m a Democrat, so pardon me for &quot;throwing money at the problem&quot; but I believe we could have bought peace for far less, without losing 3,000 soldiers in the process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Winning over the locals. Indeed. The White House website gushes that Iraqi income has risen to ~$1500 a year. We have spent $70,000 per Iraqi family on this war. Put away the boy toys and the &#8220;military options only&#8221; thinking, and there are far more effective ways to &#8220;win&#8221; this &#8220;war&#8221;. What we&#8217;ve spent so far, per family, is a lifetime income for most Iraqis. Hey, I&#8217;m a Democrat, so pardon me for &#8220;throwing money at the problem&#8221; but I believe we could have bought peace for far less, without losing 3,000 soldiers in the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Prez</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10210/what-americans-want/comment-page-1/#comment-42634</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Prez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/11/politics/what-americans-want/#comment-42634</guid>
		<description>You do know there is actually a movie director by the name of F. Gary Gray, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do know there is actually a movie director by the name of F. Gary Gray, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CStanley</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10210/what-americans-want/comment-page-1/#comment-42630</link>
		<dc:creator>CStanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/11/politics/what-americans-want/#comment-42630</guid>
		<description>I should also add, the Captain also comments on Petraeus experience and the fact that he advocates following the British model of dealing with insurgencies (holding territory by winning over the locals).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should also add, the Captain also comments on Petraeus experience and the fact that he advocates following the British model of dealing with insurgencies (holding territory by winning over the locals).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CStanley</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10210/what-americans-want/comment-page-1/#comment-42629</link>
		<dc:creator>CStanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/11/politics/what-americans-want/#comment-42629</guid>
		<description>truflo,
Ed Morrissey has a good post which says that the Iraqi&#039;s have agreed to a new commander for the Bagdad operation (someone that the US has more faith in) AND that the operation will be led on the Iraqi side primarily by Kurds. If true, that should make a difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>truflo,<br />
Ed Morrissey has a good post which says that the Iraqi&#8217;s have agreed to a new commander for the Bagdad operation (someone that the US has more faith in) AND that the operation will be led on the Iraqi side primarily by Kurds. If true, that should make a difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
