Comments on: The Islamofascist Weather Channel

By: Shaun Mullen

Shaun Mullen — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:09:03 +0000

CStanley:

No apology necessary.

By: CStanley

CStanley — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:26:16 +0000

Hah, thanks, CP. And sorry, Shaun, for my derailment of the issue at hand with my tangential comment.

By: Gray

Gray — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:25:52 +0000

“Oh, wait, youâ€™re serious, arenâ€™t you?”

Where did you get that idea?

By: Chuck Prez

Chuck Prez — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:57:47 +0000

Take the high road, don’t entertain that dude’s childish attempts. I know you’re better than that. Don’t fall for his B.S.

By: GreenDreams

GreenDreams — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:39:29 +0000

This is all about Big Brother do-gooders trying to control how you live your life, and stripping away the freedoms and liberties of people to live their lives as they see fit, engage in commerce and raise their families. (oh and "sensationalized leftist political advocacy") Wow, she is on a rant. But who can blame her, with delusional, leftist, anti-business fear-mongers like Exxon-Mobil trying to scare people about this global warming hoax...

By: Shaun Mullen

Shaun Mullen — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:20:55 +0000

Carpeicthus said:
I love the smell of insanity in the morning.

Which was exactly where my noggin was when I wrote this post fully expecting the comments thread to head off in a completely different direction. Which of course it has.

The planet seems to have tilted ever so slightly off its axis overnight. I blame the president.

By: carpeicthus

carpeicthus — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:13:41 +0000

“Far-left political ideologies are being promulgated through ever-increasing mediums”

Hahahaâ€¦ I don’t expect WorldNetDaily writers to be able to think, but shouldn’t they be somewhat familiar with writing?

By: carpeicthus

carpeicthus — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:11:39 +0000

I love the smell of insanity in the morning.

By: CStanley

CStanley — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:57:41 +0000

Imho this is a questionable stance. Actually, youâ€™re encouraging provocative behaviour by abstaining from investigating the reasons and not taking sides. Maybe you should consult an expert on parenting.

LMAO! Oh, wait, you’re serious, aren’t you? Sorry, but allowing tit for tat accomplishes nothing and disallowing one kid from excusing his or her own behavior on the basis of having been provoked is NOT the same as “encouraging provocative behavior by abstaining from investigating the reasons”. I never said that I ignore whether or not one kid really did “start it”, but that is different from allowing the other kid to use this to excuse retaliatory behavior.

Substitute the appropriate adults into the passage above for my opinion of whether or not Melanie Morgan’s rants provide justification for juvenile counterattacks.

By: Gray

Gray — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:35:57 +0000

“Iâ€™m not impressed when my kids say, â€œHe/she started itâ€?, and I donâ€™t find it any more compelling in adult discussions.”

Imho this is a questionable stance. Actually, you’re encouraging provocative behaviour by abstaining from investigating the reasons and not taking sides. Maybe you should consult an expert on parenting.

By: CStanley

CStanley — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:11:19 +0000

Gray,
I’m not impressed when my kids say, “He/she started it”, and I don’t find it any more compelling in adult discussions.

By: Gray

Gray — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:48:04 +0000

“I thought the comments about clothing and the photoshopped image were meanspirited and unnecessary”

CS, Melanie Morgan invited this kind of criticism by saying about Pelosi â€œWeâ€™ve got a bullâ€™s-eye painted on her big, wide, laughing eyes.â€?, among other hateful rants.

By: CStanley

CStanley — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:01:10 +0000

While I thought the comments about clothing and the photoshopped image were meanspirited and unnecessary, I have to admit that the news ticker at the bottom of that photoshopped FNC screenshot was pretty funny.

By: Shaun Mullen

Shaun Mullen — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:50:31 +0000

Gray:

Yup.

By: Gray

Gray — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:44:34 +0000

Well, as I saw in ‘Boston Legal’ yesterday, the MSM isn’t partisan, it just adjust it’s reporting to targeted groups of customers. Nobody will deny that there’s a strong and growing number of people that global warming is real. What problem has Melanie Morgan with companies who simply try to sell their product on a growing market? Isn’t intervention in markets an extreme leftwing idea?