<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attention Bill O&#8217;Reilly:</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/10102/attention-bill-oreilly-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10102/attention-bill-oreilly-2/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 07:08:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pyst</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10102/attention-bill-oreilly-2/comment-page-1/#comment-41720</link>
		<dc:creator>Pyst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 16:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/06/uncategorized/attention-bill-oreilly-2/#comment-41720</guid>
		<description>Years ago I saw O&#039;Gassbag debate James Carville (whom I dislike) and was cut to peices, and I mean badly. I doubt he&#039;s gotten any better since then in his bubble of Fox protection.

Scarborough would slaughter him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Years ago I saw O&#8217;Gassbag debate James Carville (whom I dislike) and was cut to peices, and I mean badly. I doubt he&#8217;s gotten any better since then in his bubble of Fox protection.</p>
<p>Scarborough would slaughter him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenDreams</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10102/attention-bill-oreilly-2/comment-page-1/#comment-41650</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenDreams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 20:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/06/uncategorized/attention-bill-oreilly-2/#comment-41650</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m impressed with the change in Scarborough&#039;s tone, and apparently in his views. Look for lots of other MSM folks to abandon the sinking ship that is the right wing noise machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m impressed with the change in Scarborough&#8217;s tone, and apparently in his views. Look for lots of other MSM folks to abandon the sinking ship that is the right wing noise machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudi</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10102/attention-bill-oreilly-2/comment-page-1/#comment-41630</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 18:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/06/uncategorized/attention-bill-oreilly-2/#comment-41630</guid>
		<description>The Gasbag really doesn&#039;t debate, he bloviates. As a demogogue, he needs enemies to make his absurd statements. Truth be damned, Gasbag is defending the common man from Long Island estate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Gasbag really doesn&#8217;t debate, he bloviates. As a demogogue, he needs enemies to make his absurd statements. Truth be damned, Gasbag is defending the common man from Long Island estate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Ritter</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10102/attention-bill-oreilly-2/comment-page-1/#comment-41614</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Ritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 16:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/06/uncategorized/attention-bill-oreilly-2/#comment-41614</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not doubting the fact that Scarborough may want to defend his conservative credentials against O&#039;Reilly&#039;s attack, but you gotta admit an on-air showdown would be a ratings bonanza for both of them. I would be interested in seeing the neoconservative school of thought battle it out with the traditional school of conservative thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not doubting the fact that Scarborough may want to defend his conservative credentials against O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s attack, but you gotta admit an on-air showdown would be a ratings bonanza for both of them. I would be interested in seeing the neoconservative school of thought battle it out with the traditional school of conservative thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jjc</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10102/attention-bill-oreilly-2/comment-page-1/#comment-41608</link>
		<dc:creator>jjc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 16:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/06/uncategorized/attention-bill-oreilly-2/#comment-41608</guid>
		<description>Kim, maybe not.  While there&#039;s no doubt an element of posturing to what Scarborough is doing, I think there&#039;s a real possibility that he&#039;s trying to make a stand as a principled conservative.  There aren&#039;t that many others doing what he&#039;s doing, so I&#039;m holding out some hope he&#039;s got bigger fish to fry than ratings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kim, maybe not.  While there&#8217;s no doubt an element of posturing to what Scarborough is doing, I think there&#8217;s a real possibility that he&#8217;s trying to make a stand as a principled conservative.  There aren&#8217;t that many others doing what he&#8217;s doing, so I&#8217;m holding out some hope he&#8217;s got bigger fish to fry than ratings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Ritter</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/10102/attention-bill-oreilly-2/comment-page-1/#comment-41599</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Ritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 15:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/06/uncategorized/attention-bill-oreilly-2/#comment-41599</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry for being so cynical- but aren&#039;t these overblown celebrity feuds more about ratings than actual grievances? This type of conflict reminds me more of Trump vs. Rosie than anything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry for being so cynical- but aren&#8217;t these overblown celebrity feuds more about ratings than actual grievances? This type of conflict reminds me more of Trump vs. Rosie than anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

